In preparation for future refactoring factor out the fetch of the IRQ
into its own helper function.
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <[email protected]>
---
Changes since v1:
- Update function to just return the IRQ rather than use a pointer
argument.
Thanks,
Charles
drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
index 4b0387d040698..f28d702dc6a89 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
@@ -148,14 +148,30 @@ static int i2c_acpi_add_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
return 1; /* No need to add resource to the list */
}
+static int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct acpi_device *adev)
+{
+ struct list_head resource_list;
+ int irq = -ENOENT;
+ int ret;
+
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list);
+
+ ret = acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &resource_list,
+ i2c_acpi_add_resource, &irq);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list);
+
+ return irq;
+}
+
static int i2c_acpi_get_info(struct acpi_device *adev,
struct i2c_board_info *info,
struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
acpi_handle *adapter_handle)
{
- struct list_head resource_list;
struct i2c_acpi_lookup lookup;
- int irq = -ENOENT;
int ret;
memset(&lookup, 0, sizeof(lookup));
@@ -186,16 +202,9 @@ static int i2c_acpi_get_info(struct acpi_device *adev,
*adapter_handle = lookup.adapter_handle;
/* Then fill IRQ number if any */
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list);
- ret = acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &resource_list,
- i2c_acpi_add_resource, &irq);
- if (ret < 0)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- if (irq >= 0)
- info->irq = irq;
-
- acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list);
+ ret = i2c_acpi_get_irq(adev);
+ if (ret >= 0)
+ info->irq = ret;
acpi_set_modalias(adev, dev_name(&adev->dev), info->type,
sizeof(info->type));
--
2.11.0
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 04:19:29PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> In preparation for future refactoring factor out the fetch of the IRQ
> into its own helper function.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> +static int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct acpi_device *adev)
> +{
> + struct list_head resource_list;
> + int irq = -ENOENT;
> + int ret;
> +
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list);
> +
> + ret = acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &resource_list,
> + i2c_acpi_add_resource, &irq);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list);
> +
> + return irq;
> +}
> +
Sorry just noticed I forgot to add the kernel doc. Will fix that
up in the next spin, or do an incremental patch.
Thanks,
Charles
On Mon, May 27, 2019 at 04:19:29PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> static int i2c_acpi_get_info(struct acpi_device *adev,
> struct i2c_board_info *info,
> struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
> acpi_handle *adapter_handle)
> {
> - struct list_head resource_list;
> struct i2c_acpi_lookup lookup;
> - int irq = -ENOENT;
> int ret;
>
> memset(&lookup, 0, sizeof(lookup));
> @@ -186,16 +202,9 @@ static int i2c_acpi_get_info(struct acpi_device *adev,
> *adapter_handle = lookup.adapter_handle;
>
> /* Then fill IRQ number if any */
> - INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list);
> - ret = acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &resource_list,
> - i2c_acpi_add_resource, &irq);
> - if (ret < 0)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
> - if (irq >= 0)
> - info->irq = irq;
> -
> - acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list);
> + ret = i2c_acpi_get_irq(adev);
> + if (ret >= 0)
Same comment here regarding irq == 0.