LinuxLists.cc - [PATCH V2] regulator: da9061/62: Adjust LDO voltage selection minimum value

2019-06-19 12:42:48

Subject: [PATCH V2] regulator: da9061/62: Adjust LDO voltage selection minimum value

From: Felix Riemann <[email protected]>

According to the DA9061 and DA9062 datasheets the LDO voltage selection
registers have a lower value of 0x02. This applies to voltage registers
VLDO1_A, VLDO2_A, VLDO3_A and VLDO4_A. This linear offset of 0x02 was
previously not observed by the driver, causing the LDO output voltage to
be systematically lower by two steps (= 0.1V).

This patch fixes the minimum linear selector offset by setting it to a
value of 2 and increases the n_voltages by the same amount allowing
voltages in the range 0x02 -> 0.9V to 0x38 -> 3.6V to be correctly
selected. Also fixes an incorrect calculaton for the n_voltages value in
the regulator LDO2.

These fixes effect all LDO regulators for DA9061 and DA9062.

Acked-by: Steve Twiss <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Steve Twiss <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Felix Riemann <[email protected]>
---

Hi Felix,

I have taken your previous patch, fixed the whitespace like we discussed
and updated the commit message to add more details. Also, I have
simplified your original patch slightly by using a single define in the
include file instead of repeating the same value for each LDO[1-4].

Finally, I added a minor typo fix which I found when calculating the
LDO2 n_voltages, there was a calculation of (3600-600)/50 instead of
(3600-900)/50.

I've finished my testing for DA9061 and DA9062 and so I've Acked your
patch and added a Tested-by tag. If you are happy with those changes to
your patch, I guess you can let the Maintainers take a look.

Regards,
Steve

drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------
include/linux/mfd/da9062/registers.h | 3 +++
2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c
index a02e048..1cadaae 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c
@@ -493,12 +493,13 @@ static int da9062_ldo_set_suspend_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
.desc.ops = &da9062_ldo_ops,
.desc.min_uV = (900) * 1000,
.desc.uV_step = (50) * 1000,
- .desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (900))/(50) + 1,
+ .desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (900))/(50) + 1
+ + DA9062AA_VLDO_A_MIN_SEL,
.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_LDO1_CONT,
.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_LDO1_EN_MASK,
.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO1_A,
.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VLDO1_A_MASK,
- .desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+ .desc.linear_min_sel = DA9062AA_VLDO_A_MIN_SEL,
.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO1_A,
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO1_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
@@ -525,12 +526,13 @@ static int da9062_ldo_set_suspend_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
.desc.ops = &da9062_ldo_ops,
.desc.min_uV = (900) * 1000,
.desc.uV_step = (50) * 1000,
- .desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (600))/(50) + 1,
+ .desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (900))/(50) + 1
+ + DA9062AA_VLDO_A_MIN_SEL,
.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_LDO2_CONT,
.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_LDO2_EN_MASK,
.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO2_A,
.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VLDO2_A_MASK,
- .desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+ .desc.linear_min_sel = DA9062AA_VLDO_A_MIN_SEL,
.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO2_A,
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO2_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
@@ -557,12 +559,13 @@ static int da9062_ldo_set_suspend_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
.desc.ops = &da9062_ldo_ops,
.desc.min_uV = (900) * 1000,
.desc.uV_step = (50) * 1000,
- .desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (900))/(50) + 1,
+ .desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (900))/(50) + 1
+ + DA9062AA_VLDO_A_MIN_SEL,
.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_LDO3_CONT,
.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_LDO3_EN_MASK,
.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO3_A,
.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VLDO3_A_MASK,
- .desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+ .desc.linear_min_sel = DA9062AA_VLDO_A_MIN_SEL,
.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO3_A,
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO3_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
@@ -589,12 +592,13 @@ static int da9062_ldo_set_suspend_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
.desc.ops = &da9062_ldo_ops,
.desc.min_uV = (900) * 1000,
.desc.uV_step = (50) * 1000,
- .desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (900))/(50) + 1,
+ .desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (900))/(50) + 1
+ + DA9062AA_VLDO_A_MIN_SEL,
.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_LDO4_CONT,
.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_LDO4_EN_MASK,
.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO4_A,
.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VLDO4_A_MASK,
- .desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+ .desc.linear_min_sel = DA9062AA_VLDO_A_MIN_SEL,
.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO4_A,
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO4_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
@@ -769,12 +773,13 @@ static int da9062_ldo_set_suspend_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
.desc.ops = &da9062_ldo_ops,
.desc.min_uV = (900) * 1000,
.desc.uV_step = (50) * 1000,
- .desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (900))/(50) + 1,
+ .desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (900))/(50) + 1
+ + DA9062AA_VLDO_A_MIN_SEL,
.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_LDO1_CONT,
.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_LDO1_EN_MASK,
.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO1_A,
.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VLDO1_A_MASK,
- .desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+ .desc.linear_min_sel = DA9062AA_VLDO_A_MIN_SEL,
.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO1_A,
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO1_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
@@ -801,12 +806,13 @@ static int da9062_ldo_set_suspend_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
.desc.ops = &da9062_ldo_ops,
.desc.min_uV = (900) * 1000,
.desc.uV_step = (50) * 1000,
- .desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (600))/(50) + 1,
+ .desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (900))/(50) + 1
+ + DA9062AA_VLDO_A_MIN_SEL,
.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_LDO2_CONT,
.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_LDO2_EN_MASK,
.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO2_A,
.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VLDO2_A_MASK,
- .desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+ .desc.linear_min_sel = DA9062AA_VLDO_A_MIN_SEL,
.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO2_A,
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO2_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
@@ -833,12 +839,13 @@ static int da9062_ldo_set_suspend_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
.desc.ops = &da9062_ldo_ops,
.desc.min_uV = (900) * 1000,
.desc.uV_step = (50) * 1000,
- .desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (900))/(50) + 1,
+ .desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (900))/(50) + 1
+ + DA9062AA_VLDO_A_MIN_SEL,
.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_LDO3_CONT,
.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_LDO3_EN_MASK,
.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO3_A,
.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VLDO3_A_MASK,
- .desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+ .desc.linear_min_sel = DA9062AA_VLDO_A_MIN_SEL,
.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO3_A,
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO3_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
@@ -865,12 +872,13 @@ static int da9062_ldo_set_suspend_mode(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
.desc.ops = &da9062_ldo_ops,
.desc.min_uV = (900) * 1000,
.desc.uV_step = (50) * 1000,
- .desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (900))/(50) + 1,
+ .desc.n_voltages = ((3600) - (900))/(50) + 1
+ + DA9062AA_VLDO_A_MIN_SEL,
.desc.enable_reg = DA9062AA_LDO4_CONT,
.desc.enable_mask = DA9062AA_LDO4_EN_MASK,
.desc.vsel_reg = DA9062AA_VLDO4_A,
.desc.vsel_mask = DA9062AA_VLDO4_A_MASK,
- .desc.linear_min_sel = 0,
+ .desc.linear_min_sel = DA9062AA_VLDO_A_MIN_SEL,
.sleep = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_VLDO4_A,
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO4_SL_A_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/da9062/registers.h b/include/linux/mfd/da9062/registers.h
index fe04b70..090213a 100644
--- a/include/linux/mfd/da9062/registers.h
+++ b/include/linux/mfd/da9062/registers.h
@@ -797,6 +797,9 @@
#define DA9062AA_BUCK3_SL_A_SHIFT 7
#define DA9062AA_BUCK3_SL_A_MASK BIT(7)

+/* DA9062AA_VLDO[1-4]_A common */
+#define DA9062AA_VLDO_A_MIN_SEL 2
+
/* DA9062AA_VLDO1_A = 0x0A9 */
#define DA9062AA_VLDO1_A_SHIFT 0
#define DA9062AA_VLDO1_A_MASK 0x3f
--
1.9.3

2019-06-19 15:08:00

by Mark Brown

[permalink] [raw]

Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] regulator: da9061/62: Adjust LDO voltage selection minimum value

On Wed, Jun 19, 2019 at 01:30:00PM +0100, Steve Twiss wrote:

>
> Acked-by: Steve Twiss <[email protected]>
> Tested-by: Steve Twiss <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Felix Riemann <[email protected]>
> ---

I can't do anything with this since you've not signed it off.

Attachments:

(No filename) (310.00 B)
signature.asc (499.00 B)
Download all attachments

2019-06-19 20:44:12

by Felix Riemann

[permalink] [raw]

Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] regulator: da9061/62: Adjust LDO voltage selection minimum value

Hi Steve,

>
> I have taken your previous patch, fixed the whitespace like we discussed
> and updated the commit message to add more details. Also, I have
> simplified your original patch slightly by using a single define in the
> include file instead of repeating the same value for each LDO[1-4].

Thanks for taking care of the whitespaces and the commit message.

> I've finished my testing for DA9061 and DA9062 and so I've Acked your
> patch and added a Tested-by tag. If you are happy with those changes to
> your patch, I guess you can let the Maintainers take a look.

Yes, I am. I couldn't spot anything problematic in your changes so far.

Regards,

Felix

___________________________________________________

SMA Solar Technology AG
Aufsichtsrat: Dr. Erik Ehrentraut (Vorsitzender)
Vorstand: Ulrich Hadding, Dr.-Ing. Juergen Reinert
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Kassel HRB 3972
Sitz der Gesellschaft: 34266 Niestetal
USt-ID-Nr. DE 113 08 59 54
WEEE-Reg.-Nr. DE 95881150
___________________________________________________