In preparation for future refactoring factor out the fetch of the IRQ
into its own helper function.
Reviewed-by: Mika Westerberg <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <[email protected]>
---
No changes since v4.
Thanks,
Charles
drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
index 47d5b1c5ec9e0..7d4d66ba752d4 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core-acpi.c
@@ -144,14 +144,30 @@ static int i2c_acpi_add_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
return 1; /* No need to add resource to the list */
}
+static int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct acpi_device *adev)
+{
+ struct list_head resource_list;
+ int irq = -ENOENT;
+ int ret;
+
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list);
+
+ ret = acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &resource_list,
+ i2c_acpi_add_resource, &irq);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list);
+
+ return irq;
+}
+
static int i2c_acpi_get_info(struct acpi_device *adev,
struct i2c_board_info *info,
struct i2c_adapter *adapter,
acpi_handle *adapter_handle)
{
- struct list_head resource_list;
struct i2c_acpi_lookup lookup;
- int irq = -ENOENT;
int ret;
memset(&lookup, 0, sizeof(lookup));
@@ -182,16 +198,9 @@ static int i2c_acpi_get_info(struct acpi_device *adev,
*adapter_handle = lookup.adapter_handle;
/* Then fill IRQ number if any */
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list);
- ret = acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &resource_list,
- i2c_acpi_add_resource, &irq);
- if (ret < 0)
- return -EINVAL;
-
- if (irq > 0)
- info->irq = irq;
-
- acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list);
+ ret = i2c_acpi_get_irq(adev);
+ if (ret > 0)
+ info->irq = ret;
acpi_set_modalias(adev, dev_name(&adev->dev), info->type,
sizeof(info->type));
--
2.11.0
On Thu, Jun 20, 2019 at 02:34:16PM +0100, Charles Keepax wrote:
> In preparation for future refactoring factor out the fetch of the IRQ
> into its own helper function.
> +static int i2c_acpi_get_irq(struct acpi_device *adev)
> +{
> + struct list_head resource_list;
> + int irq = -ENOENT;
> + int ret;
> +
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&resource_list);
> +
> + ret = acpi_dev_get_resources(adev, &resource_list,
> + i2c_acpi_add_resource, &irq);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
Can't we return ret value?
> +
> + acpi_dev_free_resource_list(&resource_list);
> +
> + return irq;
> +}
> + ret = i2c_acpi_get_irq(adev);
> + if (ret > 0)
> + info->irq = ret;
And on error we do not bail out. This changes the behaviour.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko