2019-07-12 05:18:41

by Pankaj Gupta

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v3] virtio_pmem: fix sparse warning

This patch fixes below sparse warning related to __virtio
type in virtio pmem driver. This is reported by Intel test
bot on linux-next tree.

nd_virtio.c:56:28: warning: incorrect type in assignment
(different base types)
nd_virtio.c:56:28: expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] type
nd_virtio.c:56:28: got restricted __virtio32
nd_virtio.c:93:59: warning: incorrect type in argument 2
(different base types)
nd_virtio.c:93:59: expected restricted __virtio32 [usertype] val
nd_virtio.c:93:59: got unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] ret

Reported-by: kbuild test robot <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <[email protected]>
---
This fixes a warning, so submitting it as a separate
patch on top of virtio pmem series.

v2-> v3
Use __le for req/resp fields - Michael

drivers/nvdimm/nd_virtio.c | 4 ++--
include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/nd_virtio.c b/drivers/nvdimm/nd_virtio.c
index 8645275c08c2..10351d5b49fa 100644
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/nd_virtio.c
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/nd_virtio.c
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static int virtio_pmem_flush(struct nd_region *nd_region)
init_waitqueue_head(&req_data->host_acked);
init_waitqueue_head(&req_data->wq_buf);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&req_data->list);
- req_data->req.type = cpu_to_virtio32(vdev, VIRTIO_PMEM_REQ_TYPE_FLUSH);
+ req_data->req.type = cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_PMEM_REQ_TYPE_FLUSH);
sg_init_one(&sg, &req_data->req, sizeof(req_data->req));
sgs[0] = &sg;
sg_init_one(&ret, &req_data->resp.ret, sizeof(req_data->resp));
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static int virtio_pmem_flush(struct nd_region *nd_region)
} else {
/* A host repsonse results in "host_ack" getting called */
wait_event(req_data->host_acked, req_data->done);
- err = virtio32_to_cpu(vdev, req_data->resp.ret);
+ err = le32_to_cpu(req_data->resp.ret);
}

kfree(req_data);
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h
index efcd72f2d20d..9a63ed6d062f 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h
@@ -23,12 +23,12 @@ struct virtio_pmem_config {

struct virtio_pmem_resp {
/* Host return status corresponding to flush request */
- __u32 ret;
+ __le32 ret;
};

struct virtio_pmem_req {
/* command type */
- __u32 type;
+ __le32 type;
};

#endif
--
2.14.5


2019-07-12 14:13:15

by Michael S. Tsirkin

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] virtio_pmem: fix sparse warning

On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:46:10AM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> This patch fixes below sparse warning related to __virtio
> type in virtio pmem driver. This is reported by Intel test
> bot on linux-next tree.
>
> nd_virtio.c:56:28: warning: incorrect type in assignment
> (different base types)
> nd_virtio.c:56:28: expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] type
> nd_virtio.c:56:28: got restricted __virtio32
> nd_virtio.c:93:59: warning: incorrect type in argument 2
> (different base types)
> nd_virtio.c:93:59: expected restricted __virtio32 [usertype] val
> nd_virtio.c:93:59: got unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] ret
>
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <[email protected]>

Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>

Pls merge - I assume nvdimm tree?

> ---
> This fixes a warning, so submitting it as a separate
> patch on top of virtio pmem series.
>
> v2-> v3
> Use __le for req/resp fields - Michael
>
> drivers/nvdimm/nd_virtio.c | 4 ++--
> include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/nd_virtio.c b/drivers/nvdimm/nd_virtio.c
> index 8645275c08c2..10351d5b49fa 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvdimm/nd_virtio.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvdimm/nd_virtio.c
> @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ static int virtio_pmem_flush(struct nd_region *nd_region)
> init_waitqueue_head(&req_data->host_acked);
> init_waitqueue_head(&req_data->wq_buf);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&req_data->list);
> - req_data->req.type = cpu_to_virtio32(vdev, VIRTIO_PMEM_REQ_TYPE_FLUSH);
> + req_data->req.type = cpu_to_le32(VIRTIO_PMEM_REQ_TYPE_FLUSH);
> sg_init_one(&sg, &req_data->req, sizeof(req_data->req));
> sgs[0] = &sg;
> sg_init_one(&ret, &req_data->resp.ret, sizeof(req_data->resp));
> @@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ static int virtio_pmem_flush(struct nd_region *nd_region)
> } else {
> /* A host repsonse results in "host_ack" getting called */
> wait_event(req_data->host_acked, req_data->done);
> - err = virtio32_to_cpu(vdev, req_data->resp.ret);
> + err = le32_to_cpu(req_data->resp.ret);
> }
>
> kfree(req_data);
> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h
> index efcd72f2d20d..9a63ed6d062f 100644
> --- a/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h
> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/virtio_pmem.h
> @@ -23,12 +23,12 @@ struct virtio_pmem_config {
>
> struct virtio_pmem_resp {
> /* Host return status corresponding to flush request */
> - __u32 ret;
> + __le32 ret;
> };
>
> struct virtio_pmem_req {
> /* command type */
> - __u32 type;
> + __le32 type;
> };
>
> #endif
> --
> 2.14.5

2019-07-17 03:03:09

by Dan Williams

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] virtio_pmem: fix sparse warning

On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 7:11 AM Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 10:46:10AM +0530, Pankaj Gupta wrote:
> > This patch fixes below sparse warning related to __virtio
> > type in virtio pmem driver. This is reported by Intel test
> > bot on linux-next tree.
> >
> > nd_virtio.c:56:28: warning: incorrect type in assignment
> > (different base types)
> > nd_virtio.c:56:28: expected unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] type
> > nd_virtio.c:56:28: got restricted __virtio32
> > nd_virtio.c:93:59: warning: incorrect type in argument 2
> > (different base types)
> > nd_virtio.c:93:59: expected restricted __virtio32 [usertype] val
> > nd_virtio.c:93:59: got unsigned int [unsigned] [usertype] ret
> >
> > Reported-by: kbuild test robot <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Gupta <[email protected]>
>
> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <[email protected]>
>
> Pls merge - I assume nvdimm tree?

Yes, I'll push this with the rest to Linus tomorrow morning.