There is a version1.0 MU on i.MX7ULP platform.
One new version ID register is added, and it's offset is 0.
TRn registers are defined at the offset 0x20 ~ 0x2C.
RRn registers are defined at the offset 0x40 ~ 0x4C.
SR/CR registers are defined at 0x60/0x64.
Extend this driver to support it.
Signed-off-by: Richard Zhu <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Oleksij Rempel <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Dong Aisheng <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Oleksij Rempel <[email protected]>
---
Change logs:
v2 --> v3:
- Format the patch-set refer to Oleksij's guidance.
- Init the register array by a simple way recommended by Oleksij.
- Add Reviewed-by: Oleksij Rempel <[email protected]> tag.
v1 --> v2:
- Use to have the register layout linked on probe, suggested by
Oleksij Rempel <[email protected]>.
- Add Reviewed-by: Dong Aisheng <[email protected]> tag.
Richard Zhu (1):
mailbox: imx: add support for imx v1 mu
drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c | 55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
index 25be8bb..c81be1c 100644
--- a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
+++ b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
@@ -12,19 +12,11 @@
#include <linux/of_device.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
-/* Transmit Register */
-#define IMX_MU_xTRn(x) (0x00 + 4 * (x))
-/* Receive Register */
-#define IMX_MU_xRRn(x) (0x10 + 4 * (x))
-/* Status Register */
-#define IMX_MU_xSR 0x20
#define IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(x) BIT(28 + (3 - (x)))
#define IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(x) BIT(24 + (3 - (x)))
#define IMX_MU_xSR_TEn(x) BIT(20 + (3 - (x)))
#define IMX_MU_xSR_BRDIP BIT(9)
-/* Control Register */
-#define IMX_MU_xCR 0x24
/* General Purpose Interrupt Enable */
#define IMX_MU_xCR_GIEn(x) BIT(28 + (3 - (x)))
/* Receive Interrupt Enable */
@@ -44,6 +36,13 @@ enum imx_mu_chan_type {
IMX_MU_TYPE_RXDB, /* Rx doorbell */
};
+struct imx_mu_dcfg {
+ u32 xTR[4]; /* Transmit Registers */
+ u32 xRR[4]; /* Receive Registers */
+ u32 xSR; /* Status Register */
+ u32 xCR; /* Control Register */
+};
+
struct imx_mu_con_priv {
unsigned int idx;
char irq_desc[IMX_MU_CHAN_NAME_SIZE];
@@ -61,12 +60,27 @@ struct imx_mu_priv {
struct mbox_chan mbox_chans[IMX_MU_CHANS];
struct imx_mu_con_priv con_priv[IMX_MU_CHANS];
+ const struct imx_mu_dcfg *dcfg;
struct clk *clk;
int irq;
bool side_b;
};
+static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx6sx = {
+ .xTR = {0x0, 0x4, 0x8, 0xc},
+ .xRR = {0x10, 0x14, 0x18, 0x1c},
+ .xSR = 0x20,
+ .xCR = 0x24,
+};
+
+static const struct imx_mu_dcfg imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp = {
+ .xTR = {0x20, 0x24, 0x28, 0x2c},
+ .xRR = {0x40, 0x44, 0x48, 0x4c},
+ .xSR = 0x60,
+ .xCR = 0x64,
+};
+
static struct imx_mu_priv *to_imx_mu_priv(struct mbox_controller *mbox)
{
return container_of(mbox, struct imx_mu_priv, mbox);
@@ -88,10 +102,10 @@ static u32 imx_mu_xcr_rmw(struct imx_mu_priv *priv, u32 set, u32 clr)
u32 val;
spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->xcr_lock, flags);
- val = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xCR);
+ val = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR);
val &= ~clr;
val |= set;
- imx_mu_write(priv, val, IMX_MU_xCR);
+ imx_mu_write(priv, val, priv->dcfg->xCR);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->xcr_lock, flags);
return val;
@@ -111,8 +125,8 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_mu_isr(int irq, void *p)
struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp = chan->con_priv;
u32 val, ctrl, dat;
- ctrl = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xCR);
- val = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xSR);
+ ctrl = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xCR);
+ val = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xSR);
switch (cp->type) {
case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
@@ -138,10 +152,10 @@ static irqreturn_t imx_mu_isr(int irq, void *p)
imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx));
mbox_chan_txdone(chan, 0);
} else if (val == IMX_MU_xSR_RFn(cp->idx)) {
- dat = imx_mu_read(priv, IMX_MU_xRRn(cp->idx));
+ dat = imx_mu_read(priv, priv->dcfg->xRR[cp->idx]);
mbox_chan_received_data(chan, (void *)&dat);
} else if (val == IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx)) {
- imx_mu_write(priv, IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx), IMX_MU_xSR);
+ imx_mu_write(priv, IMX_MU_xSR_GIPn(cp->idx), priv->dcfg->xSR);
mbox_chan_received_data(chan, NULL);
} else {
dev_warn_ratelimited(priv->dev, "Not handled interrupt\n");
@@ -159,7 +173,7 @@ static int imx_mu_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data)
switch (cp->type) {
case IMX_MU_TYPE_TX:
- imx_mu_write(priv, *arg, IMX_MU_xTRn(cp->idx));
+ imx_mu_write(priv, *arg, priv->dcfg->xTR[cp->idx]);
imx_mu_xcr_rmw(priv, IMX_MU_xCR_TIEn(cp->idx), 0);
break;
case IMX_MU_TYPE_TXDB:
@@ -257,7 +271,7 @@ static void imx_mu_init_generic(struct imx_mu_priv *priv)
return;
/* Set default MU configuration */
- imx_mu_write(priv, 0, IMX_MU_xCR);
+ imx_mu_write(priv, 0, priv->dcfg->xCR);
}
static int imx_mu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -265,6 +279,7 @@ static int imx_mu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
struct imx_mu_priv *priv;
+ const struct imx_mu_dcfg *dcfg;
unsigned int i;
int ret;
@@ -282,6 +297,11 @@ static int imx_mu_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (priv->irq < 0)
return priv->irq;
+ dcfg = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
+ if (!dcfg)
+ return -EINVAL;
+ priv->dcfg = dcfg;
+
priv->clk = devm_clk_get(dev, NULL);
if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) {
if (PTR_ERR(priv->clk) != -ENOENT)
@@ -335,7 +355,8 @@ static int imx_mu_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
}
static const struct of_device_id imx_mu_dt_ids[] = {
- { .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-mu" },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,imx7ulp-mu", .data = &imx_mu_cfg_imx7ulp },
+ { .compatible = "fsl,imx6sx-mu", .data = &imx_mu_cfg_imx6sx },
{ },
};
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_mu_dt_ids);
--
2.7.4
Hi Richard,
Thanks for the patch. Please always add [email protected] mailing
list for imx related patches. I missed it.
Few comments inline.
Please also update in a separate patch attached to this series
the devictree bindings doc Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.txt
by adding description for mx7ulp-mu
<snip>
> There is a version1.0 MU on i.MX7ULP platform.
space between version and 1.0
> One new version ID register is added, and it's offset is 0.
> TRn registers are defined at the offset 0x20 ~ 0x2C.
> RRn registers are defined at the offset 0x40 ~ 0x4C.
> SR/CR registers are defined at 0x60/0x64.
> Extend this driver to support it.
Do you have a little bit of history about MU versioning? So there was:
* version 0.5 on i.MX6-es
* version 1.0 on i.MX7ULP
Next, is this 1.0 compatbile with i.MX8 right?
Also, can you please rebase your patch on my 2 bugfixes attached?
thanks,
Daniel.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Baluta <[email protected]>
> Sent: 2019年8月1日 22:47
> To: Richard Zhu <[email protected]>
> Cc: [email protected]; Oleksij Rempel <[email protected]>;
> Aisheng Dong <[email protected]>; Linux Kernel Mailing List
> <[email protected]>; linux-arm-kernel
> <[email protected]>; dl-linux-imx <[email protected]>
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v3] mailbox: imx: add support for imx v1 mu
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> Thanks for the patch. Please always add [email protected] mailing list for imx
> related patches. I missed it.
>
[Richard Zhu] Okay, roger that.
> Few comments inline.
>
> Please also update in a separate patch attached to this series the devictree
> bindings doc Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/fsl,mu.txt
> by adding description for mx7ulp-mu
>
> <snip>
[Richard Zhu] Okay, the binding doc would be added later.
>
> > There is a version1.0 MU on i.MX7ULP platform.
>
> space between version and 1.0
>
[Richard Zhu] Okay.
> > One new version ID register is added, and it's offset is 0.
> > TRn registers are defined at the offset 0x20 ~ 0x2C.
> > RRn registers are defined at the offset 0x40 ~ 0x4C.
> > SR/CR registers are defined at 0x60/0x64.
> > Extend this driver to support it.
>
> Do you have a little bit of history about MU versioning? So there was:
>
> * version 0.5 on i.MX6-es
> * version 1.0 on i.MX7ULP
>
> Next, is this 1.0 compatbile with i.MX8 right?
>
[Richard Zhu] Only i.MX7ULP has the version 1.0 MU.
i.MX8 has the same version MU that i.MX6-es have.
IMHO, I don't know why design team do it this way.
> Also, can you please rebase your patch on my 2 bugfixes attached?
[Richard Zhu] Okay, no problem. I would send the v4 version out later after rebase your 2 bugfixes patches.
>
> thanks,
> Daniel.
On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 06:54:27AM +0300, Daniel Baluta wrote:
> One more thing. See below:
>
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 12:14 PM Richard Zhu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
> > -/* Control Register */
> > -#define IMX_MU_xCR 0x24
> > /* General Purpose Interrupt Enable */
> > #define IMX_MU_xCR_GIEn(x) BIT(28 + (3 - (x)))
> > /* Receive Interrupt Enable */
> > @@ -44,6 +36,13 @@ enum imx_mu_chan_type {
> > IMX_MU_TYPE_RXDB, /* Rx doorbell */
> > };
> >
> > +struct imx_mu_dcfg {
>
> Can you rename this into imx_mu_regs ?
I decided not blame this part. Otherwise adding other type of quirks
will lead to more refactoring work.
> > + u32 xTR[4]; /* Transmit Registers */
> > + u32 xRR[4]; /* Receive Registers */
> > + u32 xSR; /* Status Register */
> > + u32 xCR; /* Control Register */
> > +};
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
One more thing. See below:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 12:14 PM Richard Zhu <[email protected]> wrote:
<snip>
> -/* Control Register */
> -#define IMX_MU_xCR 0x24
> /* General Purpose Interrupt Enable */
> #define IMX_MU_xCR_GIEn(x) BIT(28 + (3 - (x)))
> /* Receive Interrupt Enable */
> @@ -44,6 +36,13 @@ enum imx_mu_chan_type {
> IMX_MU_TYPE_RXDB, /* Rx doorbell */
> };
>
> +struct imx_mu_dcfg {
Can you rename this into imx_mu_regs ?
> + u32 xTR[4]; /* Transmit Registers */
> + u32 xRR[4]; /* Receive Registers */
> + u32 xSR; /* Status Register */
> + u32 xCR; /* Control Register */
> +};