2019-08-02 13:36:09

by Greg Kroah-Hartman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 5.2 10/20] media: radio-raremono: change devm_k*alloc to k*alloc

From: Luke Nowakowski-Krijger <[email protected]>

commit c666355e60ddb4748ead3bdd983e3f7f2224aaf0 upstream.

Change devm_k*alloc to k*alloc to manually allocate memory

The manual allocation and freeing of memory is necessary because when
the USB radio is disconnected, the memory associated with devm_k*alloc
is freed. Meaning if we still have unresolved references to the radio
device, then we get use-after-free errors.

This patch fixes this by manually allocating memory, and freeing it in
the v4l2.release callback that gets called when the last radio device
exits.

Reported-and-tested-by: [email protected]

Signed-off-by: Luke Nowakowski-Krijger <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <[email protected]>
[[email protected]: cleaned up two small checkpatch.pl warnings]
[[email protected]: prefix subject with driver name]
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>

---
drivers/media/radio/radio-raremono.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/media/radio/radio-raremono.c
+++ b/drivers/media/radio/radio-raremono.c
@@ -271,6 +271,14 @@ static int vidioc_g_frequency(struct fil
return 0;
}

+static void raremono_device_release(struct v4l2_device *v4l2_dev)
+{
+ struct raremono_device *radio = to_raremono_dev(v4l2_dev);
+
+ kfree(radio->buffer);
+ kfree(radio);
+}
+
/* File system interface */
static const struct v4l2_file_operations usb_raremono_fops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
@@ -295,12 +303,14 @@ static int usb_raremono_probe(struct usb
struct raremono_device *radio;
int retval = 0;

- radio = devm_kzalloc(&intf->dev, sizeof(struct raremono_device), GFP_KERNEL);
- if (radio)
- radio->buffer = devm_kmalloc(&intf->dev, BUFFER_LENGTH, GFP_KERNEL);
-
- if (!radio || !radio->buffer)
+ radio = kzalloc(sizeof(*radio), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!radio)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ radio->buffer = kmalloc(BUFFER_LENGTH, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!radio->buffer) {
+ kfree(radio);
return -ENOMEM;
+ }

radio->usbdev = interface_to_usbdev(intf);
radio->intf = intf;
@@ -324,7 +334,8 @@ static int usb_raremono_probe(struct usb
if (retval != 3 ||
(get_unaligned_be16(&radio->buffer[1]) & 0xfff) == 0x0242) {
dev_info(&intf->dev, "this is not Thanko's Raremono.\n");
- return -ENODEV;
+ retval = -ENODEV;
+ goto free_mem;
}

dev_info(&intf->dev, "Thanko's Raremono connected: (%04X:%04X)\n",
@@ -333,7 +344,7 @@ static int usb_raremono_probe(struct usb
retval = v4l2_device_register(&intf->dev, &radio->v4l2_dev);
if (retval < 0) {
dev_err(&intf->dev, "couldn't register v4l2_device\n");
- return retval;
+ goto free_mem;
}

mutex_init(&radio->lock);
@@ -345,6 +356,7 @@ static int usb_raremono_probe(struct usb
radio->vdev.ioctl_ops = &usb_raremono_ioctl_ops;
radio->vdev.lock = &radio->lock;
radio->vdev.release = video_device_release_empty;
+ radio->v4l2_dev.release = raremono_device_release;

usb_set_intfdata(intf, &radio->v4l2_dev);

@@ -360,6 +372,10 @@ static int usb_raremono_probe(struct usb
}
dev_err(&intf->dev, "could not register video device\n");
v4l2_device_unregister(&radio->v4l2_dev);
+
+free_mem:
+ kfree(radio->buffer);
+ kfree(radio);
return retval;
}




2019-08-02 19:49:39

by Joe Perches

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.2 10/20] media: radio-raremono: change devm_k*alloc to k*alloc

On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 11:40 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> From: Luke Nowakowski-Krijger <[email protected]>
>
> commit c666355e60ddb4748ead3bdd983e3f7f2224aaf0 upstream.
>
> Change devm_k*alloc to k*alloc to manually allocate memory
>
> The manual allocation and freeing of memory is necessary because when
> the USB radio is disconnected, the memory associated with devm_k*alloc
> is freed. Meaning if we still have unresolved references to the radio
> device, then we get use-after-free errors.
>
> This patch fixes this by manually allocating memory, and freeing it in
> the v4l2.release callback that gets called when the last radio device
> exits.

This really should be commented in the code
and not just in the commit changelog as some
unsuspecting person will likely undo this in
the future without one.

> Reported-and-tested-by: [email protected]
>
> Signed-off-by: Luke Nowakowski-Krijger <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <[email protected]>
> [[email protected]: cleaned up two small checkpatch.pl warnings]
> [[email protected]: prefix subject with driver name]
> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <[email protected]>
>
> ---
> drivers/media/radio/radio-raremono.c | 30 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/drivers/media/radio/radio-raremono.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/radio/radio-raremono.c
> @@ -271,6 +271,14 @@ static int vidioc_g_frequency(struct fil
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static void raremono_device_release(struct v4l2_device *v4l2_dev)
> +{
> + struct raremono_device *radio = to_raremono_dev(v4l2_dev);
> +
> + kfree(radio->buffer);
> + kfree(radio);
> +}
> +
> /* File system interface */
> static const struct v4l2_file_operations usb_raremono_fops = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> @@ -295,12 +303,14 @@ static int usb_raremono_probe(struct usb
> struct raremono_device *radio;
> int retval = 0;
>
> - radio = devm_kzalloc(&intf->dev, sizeof(struct raremono_device), GFP_KERNEL);
> - if (radio)
> - radio->buffer = devm_kmalloc(&intf->dev, BUFFER_LENGTH, GFP_KERNEL);
> -
> - if (!radio || !radio->buffer)
> + radio = kzalloc(sizeof(*radio), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!radio)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + radio->buffer = kmalloc(BUFFER_LENGTH, GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!radio->buffer) {
> + kfree(radio);
> return -ENOMEM;
> + }
>
> radio->usbdev = interface_to_usbdev(intf);
> radio->intf = intf;
> @@ -324,7 +334,8 @@ static int usb_raremono_probe(struct usb
> if (retval != 3 ||
> (get_unaligned_be16(&radio->buffer[1]) & 0xfff) == 0x0242) {
> dev_info(&intf->dev, "this is not Thanko's Raremono.\n");
> - return -ENODEV;
> + retval = -ENODEV;
> + goto free_mem;
> }
>
> dev_info(&intf->dev, "Thanko's Raremono connected: (%04X:%04X)\n",
> @@ -333,7 +344,7 @@ static int usb_raremono_probe(struct usb
> retval = v4l2_device_register(&intf->dev, &radio->v4l2_dev);
> if (retval < 0) {
> dev_err(&intf->dev, "couldn't register v4l2_device\n");
> - return retval;
> + goto free_mem;
> }
>
> mutex_init(&radio->lock);
> @@ -345,6 +356,7 @@ static int usb_raremono_probe(struct usb
> radio->vdev.ioctl_ops = &usb_raremono_ioctl_ops;
> radio->vdev.lock = &radio->lock;
> radio->vdev.release = video_device_release_empty;
> + radio->v4l2_dev.release = raremono_device_release;
>
> usb_set_intfdata(intf, &radio->v4l2_dev);
>
> @@ -360,6 +372,10 @@ static int usb_raremono_probe(struct usb
> }
> dev_err(&intf->dev, "could not register video device\n");
> v4l2_device_unregister(&radio->v4l2_dev);
> +
> +free_mem:
> + kfree(radio->buffer);
> + kfree(radio);
> return retval;
> }
>
>
>

2019-08-06 05:35:49

by Luke Nowakowski-Krijger

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.2 10/20] media: radio-raremono: change devm_k*alloc to k*alloc

Hi there,

On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 03:04:25AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-08-02 at 11:40 +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > From: Luke Nowakowski-Krijger <[email protected]>
> >
> > commit c666355e60ddb4748ead3bdd983e3f7f2224aaf0 upstream.
> >
> > Change devm_k*alloc to k*alloc to manually allocate memory
> >
> > The manual allocation and freeing of memory is necessary because when
> > the USB radio is disconnected, the memory associated with devm_k*alloc
> > is freed. Meaning if we still have unresolved references to the radio
> > device, then we get use-after-free errors.
> >
> > This patch fixes this by manually allocating memory, and freeing it in
> > the v4l2.release callback that gets called when the last radio device
> > exits.
>
> This really should be commented in the code
> and not just in the commit changelog as some
> unsuspecting person will likely undo this in
> the future without one.

You reckon I should submit a patch with the necessary parts commented?

Thanks,
- Luke