2019-08-12 16:08:58

by Jonathan Neuschäfer

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] Documentation: sphinx: Don't parse socket() as identifier reference

With the introduction of Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py, socket() is
parsed as a reference to the in-kernel definition of socket. Sphinx then
decides that struct socket is a good match, which is usually not
intended, when the syscall is meant instead. This was observed in
Documentation/networking/af_xdp.rst.

Prevent socket() from being misinterpreted by adding it to the Skipfuncs
list in automarkup.py.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <[email protected]>
---

v2:
- block socket() in Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py, as suggested by
Jonathan Corbet

v1:
- https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
---
Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py b/Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py
index a8798369e8f7..5b6119ff69f4 100644
--- a/Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py
+++ b/Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py
@@ -26,7 +26,8 @@ RE_function = re.compile(r'([\w_][\w\d_]+\(\))')
# just don't even try with these names.
#
Skipfuncs = [ 'open', 'close', 'read', 'write', 'fcntl', 'mmap',
- 'select', 'poll', 'fork', 'execve', 'clone', 'ioctl']
+ 'select', 'poll', 'fork', 'execve', 'clone', 'ioctl',
+ 'socket' ]

#
# Find all occurrences of function() and try to replace them with
--
2.20.1


2019-08-12 16:12:40

by Mauro Carvalho Chehab

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Documentation: sphinx: Don't parse socket() as identifier reference

Em Mon, 12 Aug 2019 18:07:05 +0200
Jonathan Neuschäfer <[email protected]> escreveu:

> With the introduction of Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py, socket() is
> parsed as a reference to the in-kernel definition of socket. Sphinx then
> decides that struct socket is a good match, which is usually not
> intended, when the syscall is meant instead. This was observed in
> Documentation/networking/af_xdp.rst.
>
> Prevent socket() from being misinterpreted by adding it to the Skipfuncs
> list in automarkup.py.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> v2:
> - block socket() in Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py, as suggested by
> Jonathan Corbet
>
> v1:
> - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/[email protected]/
> ---
> Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py b/Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py
> index a8798369e8f7..5b6119ff69f4 100644
> --- a/Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py
> +++ b/Documentation/sphinx/automarkup.py
> @@ -26,7 +26,8 @@ RE_function = re.compile(r'([\w_][\w\d_]+\(\))')
> # just don't even try with these names.
> #
> Skipfuncs = [ 'open', 'close', 'read', 'write', 'fcntl', 'mmap',
> - 'select', 'poll', 'fork', 'execve', 'clone', 'ioctl']
> + 'select', 'poll', 'fork', 'execve', 'clone', 'ioctl',
> + 'socket' ]

Both patches sound OK on my eyes. Yet, I would just fold them into
a single one.

In any case:

Reviewed-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <[email protected]>
>
> #
> # Find all occurrences of function() and try to replace them with
> --
> 2.20.1
>



Thanks,
Mauro