In pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c there is a switch case which is obviously
intended to fall through to the next label. Add a comment to suppress
-Wimplicit-fallthrough warning.
Signed-off-by: Alex Dewar <[email protected]>
---
drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c
index f39da87ea185..b035dd5e25b8 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c
@@ -813,6 +813,7 @@ static int pmic_gpio_populate(struct pmic_gpio_state *state,
switch (subtype) {
case PMIC_GPIO_SUBTYPE_GPIO_4CH:
pad->have_buffer = true;
+ /* FALLS THROUGH */
case PMIC_GPIO_SUBTYPE_GPIOC_4CH:
pad->num_sources = 4;
break;
--
2.22.1
On Sat 17 Aug 01:25 PDT 2019, Alex Dewar wrote:
> In pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c there is a switch case which is obviously
> intended to fall through to the next label. Add a comment to suppress
> -Wimplicit-fallthrough warning.
>
Thanks for your patch Alex, this was fixed in 6161dc03587b ("pinctrl:
qcom: spmi-gpio: Mark expected switch fall-through")
Regards,
Bjorn
> Signed-off-by: Alex Dewar <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c
> index f39da87ea185..b035dd5e25b8 100644
> --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-gpio.c
> @@ -813,6 +813,7 @@ static int pmic_gpio_populate(struct pmic_gpio_state *state,
> switch (subtype) {
> case PMIC_GPIO_SUBTYPE_GPIO_4CH:
> pad->have_buffer = true;
> + /* FALLS THROUGH */
> case PMIC_GPIO_SUBTYPE_GPIOC_4CH:
> pad->num_sources = 4;
> break;
> --
> 2.22.1
>