2019-09-03 20:48:50

by Lyude Paul

Subject: [PATCH v2 01/27] drm/dp_mst: Move link address dumping into a function

Makes things easier to read.

Cc: Juston Li <[email protected]>
Cc: Imre Deak <[email protected]>
Cc: Ville Syrjälä <[email protected]>
Cc: Harry Wentland <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++---------
1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
index 82add736e17d..36db66a0ddb1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
@@ -2103,6 +2103,28 @@ static void drm_dp_queue_down_tx(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
mutex_unlock(&mgr->qlock);
}

+static void
+drm_dp_dump_link_address(struct drm_dp_link_address_ack_reply *reply)
+{
+ struct drm_dp_link_addr_reply_port *port_reply;
+ int i;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < reply->nports; i++) {
+ port_reply = &reply->ports[i];
+ DRM_DEBUG_KMS("port %d: input %d, pdt: %d, pn: %d, dpcd_rev: %02x, mcs: %d, ddps: %d, ldps %d, sdp %d/%d\n",
+ i,
+ port_reply->input_port,
+ port_reply->peer_device_type,
+ port_reply->port_number,
+ port_reply->dpcd_revision,
+ port_reply->mcs,
+ port_reply->ddps,
+ port_reply->legacy_device_plug_status,
+ port_reply->num_sdp_streams,
+ port_reply->num_sdp_stream_sinks);
+ }
+}
+
static void drm_dp_send_link_address(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb)
{
@@ -2128,18 +2150,7 @@ static void drm_dp_send_link_address(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("link address nak received\n");
} else {
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("link address reply: %d\n", txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.nports);
- for (i = 0; i < txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.nports; i++) {
- DRM_DEBUG_KMS("port %d: input %d, pdt: %d, pn: %d, dpcd_rev: %02x, mcs: %d, ddps: %d, ldps %d, sdp %d/%d\n", i,
- txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.ports[i].input_port,
- txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.ports[i].peer_device_type,
- txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.ports[i].port_number,
- txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.ports[i].dpcd_revision,
- txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.ports[i].mcs,
- txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.ports[i].ddps,
- txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.ports[i].legacy_device_plug_status,
- txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.ports[i].num_sdp_streams,
- txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.ports[i].num_sdp_stream_sinks);
- }
+ drm_dp_dump_link_address(&txmsg->reply.u.link_addr);

drm_dp_check_mstb_guid(mstb, txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.guid);

--
2.21.0

2019-09-26 09:51:03

by Sean Paul

Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/27] drm/dp_mst: Move link address dumping into a function

On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 04:45:39PM -0400, Lyude Paul wrote:
> Makes things easier to read.
>
> Cc: Juston Li <[email protected]>
> Cc: Imre Deak <[email protected]>
> Cc: Ville Syrj?l? <[email protected]>
> Cc: Harry Wentland <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Sean Paul <[email protected]>

> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> index 82add736e17d..36db66a0ddb1 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_dp_mst_topology.c
> @@ -2103,6 +2103,28 @@ static void drm_dp_queue_down_tx(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> mutex_unlock(&mgr->qlock);
> }
>
> +static void
> +drm_dp_dump_link_address(struct drm_dp_link_address_ack_reply *reply)
> +{
> + struct drm_dp_link_addr_reply_port *port_reply;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < reply->nports; i++) {
> + port_reply = &reply->ports[i];
> + DRM_DEBUG_KMS("port %d: input %d, pdt: %d, pn: %d, dpcd_rev: %02x, mcs: %d, ddps: %d, ldps %d, sdp %d/%d\n",
> + i,
> + port_reply->input_port,
> + port_reply->peer_device_type,
> + port_reply->port_number,
> + port_reply->dpcd_revision,
> + port_reply->mcs,
> + port_reply->ddps,
> + port_reply->legacy_device_plug_status,
> + port_reply->num_sdp_streams,
> + port_reply->num_sdp_stream_sinks);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void drm_dp_send_link_address(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> struct drm_dp_mst_branch *mstb)
> {
> @@ -2128,18 +2150,7 @@ static void drm_dp_send_link_address(struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("link address nak received\n");
> } else {
> DRM_DEBUG_KMS("link address reply: %d\n", txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.nports);
> - for (i = 0; i < txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.nports; i++) {
> - DRM_DEBUG_KMS("port %d: input %d, pdt: %d, pn: %d, dpcd_rev: %02x, mcs: %d, ddps: %d, ldps %d, sdp %d/%d\n", i,
> - txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.ports[i].input_port,
> - txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.ports[i].peer_device_type,
> - txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.ports[i].port_number,
> - txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.ports[i].dpcd_revision,
> - txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.ports[i].mcs,
> - txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.ports[i].ddps,
> - txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.ports[i].legacy_device_plug_status,
> - txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.ports[i].num_sdp_streams,
> - txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.ports[i].num_sdp_stream_sinks);
> - }
> + drm_dp_dump_link_address(&txmsg->reply.u.link_addr);
>
> drm_dp_check_mstb_guid(mstb, txmsg->reply.u.link_addr.guid);
>
> --
> 2.21.0
>

--
Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS