Hi Aleksa,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[cannot apply to v5.4-rc1 next-20190930]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Aleksa-Sarai/namei-openat2-2-path-resolution-restrictions/20191001-025628
config: i386-defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.4.0-13) 7.4.0
reproduce:
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=i386
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <[email protected]>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
fs/open.c: In function '__do_sys_openat2':
>> fs/open.c:1173:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'copy_struct_from_user'; did you mean 'copy_siginfo_from_user'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
err = copy_struct_from_user(&tmp, sizeof(tmp), how, usize);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
copy_siginfo_from_user
cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
vim +1173 fs/open.c
1163
1164 SYSCALL_DEFINE4(openat2, int, dfd, const char __user *, filename,
1165 const struct open_how __user *, how, size_t, usize)
1166 {
1167 int err;
1168 struct open_how tmp;
1169
1170 if (unlikely(usize < OPEN_HOW_SIZE_VER0))
1171 return -EINVAL;
1172
> 1173 err = copy_struct_from_user(&tmp, sizeof(tmp), how, usize);
1174 if (err)
1175 return err;
1176
1177 if (force_o_largefile())
1178 tmp.flags |= O_LARGEFILE;
1179
1180 return do_sys_open(dfd, filename, &tmp);
1181 }
1182
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
On 2019-10-01, kbuild test robot <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Aleksa,
>
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
> [cannot apply to v5.4-rc1 next-20190930]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
> improve the system. BTW, we also suggest to use '--base' option to specify the
> base tree in git format-patch, please see https://stackoverflow.com/a/37406982]
I forgot to include --base to signify this series depends on the
copy_struct_from_user() one. I'll include it in the next version.
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Aleksa-Sarai/namei-openat2-2-path-resolution-restrictions/20191001-025628
> config: i386-defconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.4.0-13) 7.4.0
> reproduce:
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> make ARCH=i386
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> Reported-by: kbuild test robot <[email protected]>
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> fs/open.c: In function '__do_sys_openat2':
> >> fs/open.c:1173:8: error: implicit declaration of function 'copy_struct_from_user'; did you mean 'copy_siginfo_from_user'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> err = copy_struct_from_user(&tmp, sizeof(tmp), how, usize);
> ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> copy_siginfo_from_user
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>
> vim +1173 fs/open.c
>
> 1163
> 1164 SYSCALL_DEFINE4(openat2, int, dfd, const char __user *, filename,
> 1165 const struct open_how __user *, how, size_t, usize)
> 1166 {
> 1167 int err;
> 1168 struct open_how tmp;
> 1169
> 1170 if (unlikely(usize < OPEN_HOW_SIZE_VER0))
> 1171 return -EINVAL;
> 1172
> > 1173 err = copy_struct_from_user(&tmp, sizeof(tmp), how, usize);
> 1174 if (err)
> 1175 return err;
> 1176
> 1177 if (force_o_largefile())
> 1178 tmp.flags |= O_LARGEFILE;
> 1179
> 1180 return do_sys_open(dfd, filename, &tmp);
> 1181 }
> 1182
>
> ---
> 0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
> https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
--
Aleksa Sarai
Senior Software Engineer (Containers)
SUSE Linux GmbH
<https://www.cyphar.com/>