2019-10-15 12:07:44

by Mihail Atanassov

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] drm/komeda: Dump SC_ENH_* registers from scaler block

Signed-off-by: Mihail Atanassov <[email protected]>
---
.../gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_component.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_component.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_component.c
index c3d29c0b051b..7252fc387fba 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_component.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_component.c
@@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ static void d71_scaler_update(struct komeda_component *c,

static void d71_scaler_dump(struct komeda_component *c, struct seq_file *sf)
{
- u32 v[9];
+ u32 v[10];

dump_block_header(sf, c->reg);

@@ -723,6 +723,18 @@ static void d71_scaler_dump(struct komeda_component *c, struct seq_file *sf)
seq_printf(sf, "SC_H_DELTA_PH:\t\t0x%X\n", v[6]);
seq_printf(sf, "SC_V_INIT_PH:\t\t0x%X\n", v[7]);
seq_printf(sf, "SC_V_DELTA_PH:\t\t0x%X\n", v[8]);
+
+ get_values_from_reg(c->reg, 0x130, 10, v);
+ seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_LIMITS:\t\t0x%X\n", v[0]);
+ seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_COEFF0:\t\t0x%X\n", v[1]);
+ seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_COEFF1:\t\t0x%X\n", v[2]);
+ seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_COEFF2:\t\t0x%X\n", v[3]);
+ seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_COEFF3:\t\t0x%X\n", v[4]);
+ seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_COEFF4:\t\t0x%X\n", v[5]);
+ seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_COEFF5:\t\t0x%X\n", v[6]);
+ seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_COEFF6:\t\t0x%X\n", v[7]);
+ seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_COEFF7:\t\t0x%X\n", v[8]);
+ seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_COEFF8:\t\t0x%X\n", v[9]);
}

static const struct komeda_component_funcs d71_scaler_funcs = {
--
2.23.0


2019-10-16 12:51:01

by James Qian Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: drm/komeda: Dump SC_ENH_* registers from scaler block

On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:00:01AM +0000, Mihail Atanassov wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Mihail Atanassov <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_component.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_component.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_component.c
> index c3d29c0b051b..7252fc387fba 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_component.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_component.c
> @@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ static void d71_scaler_update(struct komeda_component *c,
>
> static void d71_scaler_dump(struct komeda_component *c, struct seq_file *sf)
> {
> - u32 v[9];
> + u32 v[10];
>
> dump_block_header(sf, c->reg);
>
> @@ -723,6 +723,18 @@ static void d71_scaler_dump(struct komeda_component *c, struct seq_file *sf)
> seq_printf(sf, "SC_H_DELTA_PH:\t\t0x%X\n", v[6]);
> seq_printf(sf, "SC_V_INIT_PH:\t\t0x%X\n", v[7]);
> seq_printf(sf, "SC_V_DELTA_PH:\t\t0x%X\n", v[8]);
> +
> + get_values_from_reg(c->reg, 0x130, 10, v);
> + seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_LIMITS:\t\t0x%X\n", v[0]);
> + seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_COEFF0:\t\t0x%X\n", v[1]);
> + seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_COEFF1:\t\t0x%X\n", v[2]);
> + seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_COEFF2:\t\t0x%X\n", v[3]);
> + seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_COEFF3:\t\t0x%X\n", v[4]);
> + seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_COEFF4:\t\t0x%X\n", v[5]);
> + seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_COEFF5:\t\t0x%X\n", v[6]);
> + seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_COEFF6:\t\t0x%X\n", v[7]);
> + seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_COEFF7:\t\t0x%X\n", v[8]);
> + seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_COEFF8:\t\t0x%X\n", v[9]);
> }
>

Looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: James Qian Wang (Arm Technology China) <[email protected]>

> static const struct komeda_component_funcs d71_scaler_funcs = {

2019-10-21 13:46:45

by Mihail Atanassov

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: drm/komeda: Dump SC_ENH_* registers from scaler block

On Wednesday, 16 October 2019 09:17:39 BST james qian wang (Arm Technology China) wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019 at 11:00:01AM +0000, Mihail Atanassov wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Mihail Atanassov <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > .../gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_component.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_component.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_component.c
> > index c3d29c0b051b..7252fc387fba 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_component.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/arm/display/komeda/d71/d71_component.c
> > @@ -703,7 +703,7 @@ static void d71_scaler_update(struct komeda_component *c,
> >
> > static void d71_scaler_dump(struct komeda_component *c, struct seq_file *sf)
> > {
> > - u32 v[9];
> > + u32 v[10];
> >
> > dump_block_header(sf, c->reg);
> >
> > @@ -723,6 +723,18 @@ static void d71_scaler_dump(struct komeda_component *c, struct seq_file *sf)
> > seq_printf(sf, "SC_H_DELTA_PH:\t\t0x%X\n", v[6]);
> > seq_printf(sf, "SC_V_INIT_PH:\t\t0x%X\n", v[7]);
> > seq_printf(sf, "SC_V_DELTA_PH:\t\t0x%X\n", v[8]);
> > +
> > + get_values_from_reg(c->reg, 0x130, 10, v);
> > + seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_LIMITS:\t\t0x%X\n", v[0]);
> > + seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_COEFF0:\t\t0x%X\n", v[1]);
> > + seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_COEFF1:\t\t0x%X\n", v[2]);
> > + seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_COEFF2:\t\t0x%X\n", v[3]);
> > + seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_COEFF3:\t\t0x%X\n", v[4]);
> > + seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_COEFF4:\t\t0x%X\n", v[5]);
> > + seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_COEFF5:\t\t0x%X\n", v[6]);
> > + seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_COEFF6:\t\t0x%X\n", v[7]);
> > + seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_COEFF7:\t\t0x%X\n", v[8]);
> > + seq_printf(sf, "SC_ENH_COEFF8:\t\t0x%X\n", v[9]);
> > }
> >
>
> Looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: James Qian Wang (Arm Technology China) <[email protected]>

Thanks, applied to drm-misc-next -
2b6f5883edcc47ef6146832112a0125810d28f78.

>
> > static const struct komeda_component_funcs d71_scaler_funcs = {
>


--
Mihail