2019-10-20 03:21:59

by Vivien Didelot

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH net-next 06/16] net: dsa: use ports list for routing table setup

Use the new ports list instead of accessing the dsa_switch array
of ports when iterating over DSA ports of a switch to set up the
routing table.

Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <[email protected]>
---
net/dsa/dsa2.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/dsa/dsa2.c b/net/dsa/dsa2.c
index fd2b7f157f97..84afeaeef141 100644
--- a/net/dsa/dsa2.c
+++ b/net/dsa/dsa2.c
@@ -157,6 +157,7 @@ static bool dsa_port_setup_routing_table(struct dsa_port *dp)

static bool dsa_switch_setup_routing_table(struct dsa_switch *ds)
{
+ struct dsa_switch_tree *dst = ds->dst;
bool complete = true;
struct dsa_port *dp;
int i;
@@ -164,10 +165,8 @@ static bool dsa_switch_setup_routing_table(struct dsa_switch *ds)
for (i = 0; i < DSA_MAX_SWITCHES; i++)
ds->rtable[i] = DSA_RTABLE_NONE;

- for (i = 0; i < ds->num_ports; i++) {
- dp = &ds->ports[i];
-
- if (dsa_port_is_dsa(dp)) {
+ list_for_each_entry(dp, &dst->ports, list) {
+ if (dp->ds == ds && dsa_port_is_dsa(dp)) {
complete = dsa_port_setup_routing_table(dp);
if (!complete)
break;
--
2.23.0


2019-10-21 02:43:46

by Florian Fainelli

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 06/16] net: dsa: use ports list for routing table setup



On 10/19/2019 8:19 PM, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Use the new ports list instead of accessing the dsa_switch array
> of ports when iterating over DSA ports of a switch to set up the
> routing table.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <[email protected]>
--
Florian

2019-10-21 12:53:24

by Andrew Lunn

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 06/16] net: dsa: use ports list for routing table setup

On Sat, Oct 19, 2019 at 11:19:31PM -0400, Vivien Didelot wrote:
> Use the new ports list instead of accessing the dsa_switch array
> of ports when iterating over DSA ports of a switch to set up the
> routing table.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivien Didelot <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Andrew Lunn <[email protected]>

Andrew