On Sat 26-10-19 19:28:08, Hillf Danton wrote:
>
> The cpu preemption feature makes a task able to preempt other tasks
> of lower priorities for cpu. It has been around for a while.
>
> This work introduces task prio into page reclaiming in order to add
> the page preemption feature that makes a task able to preempt other
> tasks of lower priorities for page.
>
> No page will be reclaimed on behalf of tasks of lower priorities
> under pp, a two-edge feature that functions only under memory
> pressure, laying a barrier to pages flowing to lower prio, and the
> nice syscall is what users need to fiddle with it for instance as
> no task will be preempted without prio shades, if they have a couple
> of workloads that are sensitive to jitters in lru pages, and some
> difficulty predicting their working set sizes.
>
> Currently lru pages are reclaimed under memory pressure without prio
> taken into account; pages can be reclaimed from tasks of lower
> priorities on behalf of higher-prio tasks and vice versa.
>
> s/and vice versa/only/ is what we need to make pp by definition, but
> it could not make a sense without prio introduced in reclaiming,
> otherwise we can simply skip deactivating the lru pages based on prio
> comprison, and work is done.
>
> The introduction consists of two parts. On the page side, we have to
> store the page owner task's prio in page, which needs an extra room the
> size of the int type in the page struct.
>
> That room sounds impossible without inflating the page struct size, and
> it is not solved but walked around by sharing room with the 32-bit numa
> balancing, see 75980e97dacc ("mm: fold page->_last_nid into page->flags
> where possible").
>
> On the reclaimer side, kswapd's prio is set with the prio of its waker,
> and updated in the same manner as kswapd_order.
>
> V2 is based on next-20191018.
>
> Changes since v1
> - page->prio shares room with _last_cpupid as per Matthew Wilcox
>
> Changes since v0
> - s/page->nice/page->prio/
> - drop the role of kswapd's reclaiming prioirty in prio comparison
> - add pgdat->kswapd_prio
>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <[email protected]>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
> Cc: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>
> Cc: Shakeel Butt <[email protected]>
> Cc: Minchan Kim <[email protected]>
> Cc: Mel Gorman <[email protected]>
> Cc: Vladimir Davydov <[email protected]>
> Cc: Jan Kara <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <[email protected]>
As already raised in the review of v1. There is no real life usecase
described in the changelog. I have also expressed concerns about how
such a reclaim would work in the first place (priority inversion,
expensive reclaim etc.). Until that is provided/clarified
Nacked-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
Please do not ignore review feedback in the future.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 09:41:53AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> As already raised in the review of v1. There is no real life usecase
> described in the changelog. I have also expressed concerns about how
> such a reclaim would work in the first place (priority inversion,
> expensive reclaim etc.). Until that is provided/clarified
>
> Nacked-by: Michal Hocko <[email protected]>
I second this.
Nacked-by: Johannes Weiner <[email protected]>