Hi,
I'm going through the tree to remove dma_request_slave_channel_reason() as it
is just:
#define dma_request_slave_channel_reason(dev, name) \
dma_request_chan(dev, name)
Regards,
Peter
---
Peter Ujfalusi (4):
i2c: at91: Use dma_request_chan() directly for channel request
i2c: qup: Use dma_request_chan() directly for channel request
i2c: sh_mobile: Use dma_request_chan() directly for channel request
i2c: tegra: Use dma_request_chan() directly for channel request
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-at91-master.c | 4 ++--
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qup.c | 4 ++--
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-sh_mobile.c | 2 +-
drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-tegra.c | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--
Peter
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki.
Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki
On 13-11-19, 11:22, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm going through the tree to remove dma_request_slave_channel_reason() as it
> is just:
> #define dma_request_slave_channel_reason(dev, name) \
> dma_request_chan(dev, name)
Reviewed-by: Vinod Koul <[email protected]>
--
~Vinod
On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 11:22:31AM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm going through the tree to remove dma_request_slave_channel_reason() as it
> is just:
> #define dma_request_slave_channel_reason(dev, name) \
> dma_request_chan(dev, name)
>
> Regards,
> Peter
Applied to for-next, thanks!