2019-11-27 14:01:11

by Marco Felsch

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2 5/5] regulator: da9062: add gpio based regulator dis-/enable support

Each regulator can be enabeld/disabled by the internal pmic state
machine or by a gpio input signal. Typically the OTP configures the
regulators to be enabled/disabled on a specific sequence number which is
most the time fine. Sometimes we need to reconfigure that due to a PCB
bug. This patch adds the support to disable/enable the regulator based
on a gpio input signal.

Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <[email protected]>
---
drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c
index f545ae39352e..484b5c9a1d7e 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/da9062-regulator.c
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ struct da9062_regulator_info {
struct reg_field suspend_sleep;
unsigned int suspend_vsel_reg;
struct reg_field vsel_gpi;
+ struct reg_field ena_gpi;
/* Event detection bit */
struct reg_field oc_event;
};
@@ -68,6 +69,7 @@ struct da9062_regulator {
struct regmap_field *sleep;
struct regmap_field *suspend_sleep;
struct regmap_field *vsel_gpi;
+ struct regmap_field *ena_gpi;
};

/* Encapsulates all information for the regulators driver */
@@ -413,7 +415,10 @@ static int da9062_config_gpi(struct device_node *np,
goto free;
}

- ret = regmap_field_write(regl->vsel_gpi, nr);
+ if (!strncmp(gpi_id, "ena", 3))
+ ret = regmap_field_write(regl->ena_gpi, nr);
+ else
+ ret = regmap_field_write(regl->vsel_gpi, nr);

free:
kfree(prop);
@@ -426,7 +431,13 @@ static int da9062_parse_dt(struct device_node *np,
const struct regulator_desc *desc,
struct regulator_config *cfg)
{
- return da9062_config_gpi(np, desc, cfg, "vsel");
+ int error;
+
+ error = da9062_config_gpi(np, desc, cfg, "vsel");
+ if (error)
+ return error;
+
+ return da9062_config_gpi(np, desc, cfg, "ena");
}

/* DA9061 Regulator information */
@@ -471,6 +482,10 @@ static const struct da9062_regulator_info local_da9061_regulator_info[] = {
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VBUCK1_GPI_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
__builtin_clz(DA9062AA_VBUCK1_GPI_MASK) - 1),
+ .ena_gpi = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_BUCK1_CONT,
+ __builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK1_GPI_MASK) - 1,
+ sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+ __builtin_clz(DA9062AA_BUCK1_GPI_MASK) - 1),
},
{
.desc.id = DA9061_ID_BUCK2,
@@ -512,6 +527,10 @@ static const struct da9062_regulator_info local_da9061_regulator_info[] = {
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VBUCK3_GPI_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
__builtin_clz(DA9062AA_VBUCK3_GPI_MASK) - 1),
+ .ena_gpi = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_BUCK3_CONT,
+ __builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK3_GPI_MASK) - 1,
+ sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+ __builtin_clz(DA9062AA_BUCK3_GPI_MASK) - 1),
},
{
.desc.id = DA9061_ID_BUCK3,
@@ -553,6 +572,10 @@ static const struct da9062_regulator_info local_da9061_regulator_info[] = {
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VBUCK4_GPI_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
__builtin_clz(DA9062AA_VBUCK4_GPI_MASK) - 1),
+ .ena_gpi = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_BUCK4_CONT,
+ __builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK4_GPI_MASK) - 1,
+ sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+ __builtin_clz(DA9062AA_BUCK4_GPI_MASK) - 1),
},
{
.desc.id = DA9061_ID_LDO1,
@@ -587,6 +610,10 @@ static const struct da9062_regulator_info local_da9061_regulator_info[] = {
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VLDO1_GPI_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
__builtin_clz(DA9062AA_VLDO1_GPI_MASK) - 1),
+ .ena_gpi = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_LDO1_CONT,
+ __builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO1_GPI_MASK) - 1,
+ sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+ __builtin_clz(DA9062AA_LDO1_GPI_MASK) - 1),
.oc_event = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_STATUS_D,
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO1_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
@@ -625,6 +652,10 @@ static const struct da9062_regulator_info local_da9061_regulator_info[] = {
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VLDO2_GPI_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
__builtin_clz(DA9062AA_VLDO2_GPI_MASK) - 1),
+ .ena_gpi = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_LDO2_CONT,
+ __builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO2_GPI_MASK) - 1,
+ sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+ __builtin_clz(DA9062AA_LDO2_GPI_MASK) - 1),
.oc_event = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_STATUS_D,
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO2_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
@@ -663,6 +694,10 @@ static const struct da9062_regulator_info local_da9061_regulator_info[] = {
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VLDO3_GPI_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
__builtin_clz(DA9062AA_VLDO3_GPI_MASK) - 1),
+ .ena_gpi = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_LDO3_CONT,
+ __builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO3_GPI_MASK) - 1,
+ sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+ __builtin_clz(DA9062AA_LDO3_GPI_MASK) - 1),
.oc_event = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_STATUS_D,
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO3_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
@@ -701,6 +736,10 @@ static const struct da9062_regulator_info local_da9061_regulator_info[] = {
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VLDO4_GPI_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
__builtin_clz(DA9062AA_VLDO4_GPI_MASK) - 1),
+ .ena_gpi = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_LDO4_CONT,
+ __builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO4_GPI_MASK) - 1,
+ sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+ __builtin_clz(DA9062AA_LDO4_GPI_MASK) - 1),
.oc_event = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_STATUS_D,
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO4_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
@@ -750,6 +789,10 @@ static const struct da9062_regulator_info local_da9062_regulator_info[] = {
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VBUCK1_GPI_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
__builtin_clz(DA9062AA_VBUCK1_GPI_MASK) - 1),
+ .ena_gpi = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_BUCK1_CONT,
+ __builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK1_GPI_MASK) - 1,
+ sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+ __builtin_clz(DA9062AA_BUCK1_GPI_MASK) - 1),
},
{
.desc.id = DA9062_ID_BUCK2,
@@ -791,6 +834,10 @@ static const struct da9062_regulator_info local_da9062_regulator_info[] = {
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VBUCK2_GPI_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
__builtin_clz(DA9062AA_VBUCK2_GPI_MASK) - 1),
+ .ena_gpi = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_BUCK2_CONT,
+ __builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK2_GPI_MASK) - 1,
+ sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+ __builtin_clz(DA9062AA_BUCK2_GPI_MASK) - 1),
},
{
.desc.id = DA9062_ID_BUCK3,
@@ -832,6 +879,10 @@ static const struct da9062_regulator_info local_da9062_regulator_info[] = {
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VBUCK3_GPI_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
__builtin_clz(DA9062AA_VBUCK3_GPI_MASK) - 1),
+ .ena_gpi = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_BUCK3_CONT,
+ __builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK3_GPI_MASK) - 1,
+ sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+ __builtin_clz(DA9062AA_BUCK3_GPI_MASK) - 1),
},
{
.desc.id = DA9062_ID_BUCK4,
@@ -873,6 +924,10 @@ static const struct da9062_regulator_info local_da9062_regulator_info[] = {
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VBUCK4_GPI_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
__builtin_clz(DA9062AA_VBUCK4_GPI_MASK) - 1),
+ .ena_gpi = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_BUCK4_CONT,
+ __builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_BUCK4_GPI_MASK) - 1,
+ sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+ __builtin_clz(DA9062AA_BUCK4_GPI_MASK) - 1),
},
{
.desc.id = DA9062_ID_LDO1,
@@ -907,6 +962,10 @@ static const struct da9062_regulator_info local_da9062_regulator_info[] = {
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VLDO1_GPI_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
__builtin_clz(DA9062AA_VLDO1_GPI_MASK) - 1),
+ .ena_gpi = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_LDO1_CONT,
+ __builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO1_GPI_MASK) - 1,
+ sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+ __builtin_clz(DA9062AA_LDO1_GPI_MASK) - 1),
.oc_event = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_STATUS_D,
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO1_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
@@ -945,6 +1004,10 @@ static const struct da9062_regulator_info local_da9062_regulator_info[] = {
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VLDO2_GPI_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
__builtin_clz(DA9062AA_VLDO2_GPI_MASK) - 1),
+ .ena_gpi = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_LDO2_CONT,
+ __builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO2_GPI_MASK) - 1,
+ sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+ __builtin_clz(DA9062AA_LDO2_GPI_MASK) - 1),
.oc_event = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_STATUS_D,
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO2_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
@@ -983,6 +1046,10 @@ static const struct da9062_regulator_info local_da9062_regulator_info[] = {
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VLDO3_GPI_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
__builtin_clz(DA9062AA_VLDO3_GPI_MASK) - 1),
+ .ena_gpi = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_LDO3_CONT,
+ __builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO3_GPI_MASK) - 1,
+ sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+ __builtin_clz(DA9062AA_LDO3_GPI_MASK) - 1),
.oc_event = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_STATUS_D,
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO3_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
@@ -1021,6 +1088,10 @@ static const struct da9062_regulator_info local_da9062_regulator_info[] = {
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_VLDO4_GPI_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
__builtin_clz(DA9062AA_VLDO4_GPI_MASK) - 1),
+ .ena_gpi = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_LDO4_CONT,
+ __builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO4_GPI_MASK) - 1,
+ sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
+ __builtin_clz(DA9062AA_LDO4_GPI_MASK) - 1),
.oc_event = REG_FIELD(DA9062AA_STATUS_D,
__builtin_ffs((int)DA9062AA_LDO4_ILIM_MASK) - 1,
sizeof(unsigned int) * 8 -
@@ -1150,6 +1221,15 @@ static int da9062_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return PTR_ERR(regl->vsel_gpi);
}

+ if (regl->info->ena_gpi.reg) {
+ regl->ena_gpi = devm_regmap_field_alloc(
+ &pdev->dev,
+ chip->regmap,
+ regl->info->ena_gpi);
+ if (IS_ERR(regl->ena_gpi))
+ return PTR_ERR(regl->ena_gpi);
+ }
+
/* Register regulator */
memset(&config, 0, sizeof(config));
config.dev = chip->dev;
--
2.20.1


2019-11-29 08:27:32

by Linus Walleij

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] regulator: da9062: add gpio based regulator dis-/enable support

On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 2:59 PM Marco Felsch <[email protected]> wrote:

> Each regulator can be enabeld/disabled by the internal pmic state
> machine or by a gpio input signal. Typically the OTP configures the
> regulators to be enabled/disabled on a specific sequence number which is
> most the time fine. Sometimes we need to reconfigure that due to a PCB
> bug. This patch adds the support to disable/enable the regulator based
> on a gpio input signal.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <[email protected]>

Overall I think this is fine, it's a solid use case that need to be
supported.

> + struct reg_field ena_gpi;

Maybe just add some doc comment to this struct member?

IIUC it is a general purpose input that can be configured
such that it will enable one of the DA9062 regulators when
asserted. (Correct?)

Yours,
Linus Walleij

2019-11-29 09:15:06

by Marco Felsch

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] regulator: da9062: add gpio based regulator dis-/enable support

On 19-11-29 09:25, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 2:59 PM Marco Felsch <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Each regulator can be enabeld/disabled by the internal pmic state
> > machine or by a gpio input signal. Typically the OTP configures the
> > regulators to be enabled/disabled on a specific sequence number which is
> > most the time fine. Sometimes we need to reconfigure that due to a PCB
> > bug. This patch adds the support to disable/enable the regulator based
> > on a gpio input signal.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Marco Felsch <[email protected]>
>
> Overall I think this is fine, it's a solid use case that need to be
> supported.
>
> > + struct reg_field ena_gpi;
>
> Maybe just add some doc comment to this struct member?

Yes, I can do that.

> IIUC it is a general purpose input that can be configured
> such that it will enable one of the DA9062 regulators when
> asserted. (Correct?)

Yes that's correct.

Regards,
Marco

> Yours,
> Linus Walleij
>

--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |