2020-01-09 19:18:11

by Marco Elver

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH -rcu 0/2] kcsan: Improvements to reporting

Improvements to KCSAN data race reporting:
1. Show if access is marked (*_ONCE, atomic, etc.).
2. Rate limit reporting to avoid spamming console.

Marco Elver (2):
kcsan: Show full access type in report
kcsan: Rate-limit reporting per data races

kernel/kcsan/core.c | 15 +++--
kernel/kcsan/kcsan.h | 2 +-
kernel/kcsan/report.c | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
lib/Kconfig.kcsan | 10 +++
4 files changed, 148 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

--
2.25.0.rc1.283.g88dfdc4193-goog


2020-01-09 20:09:11

by Marco Elver

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH -rcu 2/2] kcsan: Rate-limit reporting per data races

Adds support for rate limiting reports. This uses a time based rate
limit, that limits any given data race report to no more than one in a
fixed time window (default is 3 sec). This should prevent the console
from being spammed with data race reports, that would render the system
unusable.

The implementation assumes that unique data races and the rate at which
they occur is bounded, since we cannot store arbitrarily many past data
race report information: we use a fixed-size array to store the required
information. We cannot use kmalloc/krealloc and resize the list when
needed, as reporting is triggered by the instrumentation calls; to
permit using KCSAN on the allocators, we cannot (re-)allocate any memory
during report generation (data races in the allocators lead to
deadlock).

Reported-by: Qian Cai <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <[email protected]>
---
kernel/kcsan/report.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
lib/Kconfig.kcsan | 10 ++++
2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/kcsan/report.c b/kernel/kcsan/report.c
index 9f503ca2ff7a..e324af7d14c9 100644
--- a/kernel/kcsan/report.c
+++ b/kernel/kcsan/report.c
@@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0

#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/ktime.h>
#include <linux/preempt.h>
#include <linux/printk.h>
#include <linux/sched.h>
@@ -31,12 +32,101 @@ static struct {
int num_stack_entries;
} other_info = { .ptr = NULL };

+/*
+ * Information about reported data races; used to rate limit reporting.
+ */
+struct report_time {
+ /*
+ * The last time the data race was reported.
+ */
+ ktime_t time;
+
+ /*
+ * The frames of the 2 threads; if only 1 thread is known, one frame
+ * will be 0.
+ */
+ unsigned long frame1;
+ unsigned long frame2;
+};
+
+/*
+ * Since we also want to be able to debug allocators with KCSAN, to avoid
+ * deadlock, report_times cannot be dynamically resized with krealloc in
+ * rate_limit_report.
+ *
+ * Therefore, we use a fixed-size array, which at most will occupy a page. This
+ * still adequately rate limits reports, assuming that a) number of unique data
+ * races is not excessive, and b) occurrence of unique data races within the
+ * same time window is limited.
+ */
+#define REPORT_TIMES_MAX (PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct report_time))
+#define REPORT_TIMES_SIZE \
+ (CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS > REPORT_TIMES_MAX ? \
+ REPORT_TIMES_MAX : \
+ CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS)
+static struct report_time report_times[REPORT_TIMES_SIZE];
+
/*
* This spinlock protects reporting and other_info, since other_info is usually
* required when reporting.
*/
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(report_lock);

+/*
+ * Checks if the data race identified by thread frames frame1 and frame2 has
+ * been reported since (now - KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS).
+ */
+static bool rate_limit_report(unsigned long frame1, unsigned long frame2)
+{
+ struct report_time *use_entry = &report_times[0];
+ ktime_t now;
+ ktime_t invalid_before;
+ int i;
+
+ BUILD_BUG_ON(CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS != 0 && REPORT_TIMES_SIZE == 0);
+
+ if (CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS == 0)
+ return false;
+
+ now = ktime_get();
+ invalid_before = ktime_sub_ms(now, CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS);
+
+ /* Check if a matching data race report exists. */
+ for (i = 0; i < REPORT_TIMES_SIZE; ++i) {
+ struct report_time *rt = &report_times[i];
+
+ /*
+ * Must always select an entry for use to store info as we
+ * cannot resize report_times; at the end of the scan, use_entry
+ * will be the oldest entry, which ideally also happened before
+ * KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS ago.
+ */
+ if (ktime_before(rt->time, use_entry->time))
+ use_entry = rt;
+
+ /*
+ * Initially, no need to check any further as this entry as well
+ * as following entries have never been used.
+ */
+ if (rt->time == 0)
+ break;
+
+ /* Check if entry expired. */
+ if (ktime_before(rt->time, invalid_before))
+ continue; /* before KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS ago */
+
+ /* Reported recently, check if data race matches. */
+ if ((rt->frame1 == frame1 && rt->frame2 == frame2) ||
+ (rt->frame1 == frame2 && rt->frame2 == frame1))
+ return true;
+ }
+
+ use_entry->time = now;
+ use_entry->frame1 = frame1;
+ use_entry->frame2 = frame2;
+ return false;
+}
+
/*
* Special rules to skip reporting.
*/
@@ -132,7 +222,9 @@ static bool print_report(const volatile void *ptr, size_t size, int access_type,
unsigned long stack_entries[NUM_STACK_ENTRIES] = { 0 };
int num_stack_entries = stack_trace_save(stack_entries, NUM_STACK_ENTRIES, 1);
int skipnr = get_stack_skipnr(stack_entries, num_stack_entries);
- int other_skipnr;
+ unsigned long this_frame = stack_entries[skipnr];
+ unsigned long other_frame = 0;
+ int other_skipnr = 0; /* silence uninit warnings */

/*
* Must check report filter rules before starting to print.
@@ -143,34 +235,34 @@ static bool print_report(const volatile void *ptr, size_t size, int access_type,
if (type == KCSAN_REPORT_RACE_SIGNAL) {
other_skipnr = get_stack_skipnr(other_info.stack_entries,
other_info.num_stack_entries);
+ other_frame = other_info.stack_entries[other_skipnr];

/* @value_change is only known for the other thread */
- if (skip_report(other_info.access_type, value_change,
- other_info.stack_entries[other_skipnr]))
+ if (skip_report(other_info.access_type, value_change, other_frame))
return false;
}

+ if (rate_limit_report(this_frame, other_frame))
+ return false;
+
/* Print report header. */
pr_err("==================================================================\n");
switch (type) {
case KCSAN_REPORT_RACE_SIGNAL: {
- void *this_fn = (void *)stack_entries[skipnr];
- void *other_fn = (void *)other_info.stack_entries[other_skipnr];
int cmp;

/*
* Order functions lexographically for consistent bug titles.
* Do not print offset of functions to keep title short.
*/
- cmp = sym_strcmp(other_fn, this_fn);
+ cmp = sym_strcmp((void *)other_frame, (void *)this_frame);
pr_err("BUG: KCSAN: data-race in %ps / %ps\n",
- cmp < 0 ? other_fn : this_fn,
- cmp < 0 ? this_fn : other_fn);
+ (void *)(cmp < 0 ? other_frame : this_frame),
+ (void *)(cmp < 0 ? this_frame : other_frame));
} break;

case KCSAN_REPORT_RACE_UNKNOWN_ORIGIN:
- pr_err("BUG: KCSAN: data-race in %pS\n",
- (void *)stack_entries[skipnr]);
+ pr_err("BUG: KCSAN: data-race in %pS\n", (void *)this_frame);
break;

default:
diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.kcsan b/lib/Kconfig.kcsan
index 3f78b1434375..3552990abcfe 100644
--- a/lib/Kconfig.kcsan
+++ b/lib/Kconfig.kcsan
@@ -81,6 +81,16 @@ config KCSAN_SKIP_WATCH_RANDOMIZE
KCSAN_WATCH_SKIP. If false, the chosen value is always
KCSAN_WATCH_SKIP.

+config KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS
+ int "Duration in milliseconds, in which any given data race is only reported once"
+ default 3000
+ help
+ Any given data race is only reported once in the defined time window.
+ Different data races may still generate reports within a duration
+ that is smaller than the duration defined here. This allows rate
+ limiting reporting to avoid flooding the console with reports.
+ Setting this to 0 disables rate limiting.
+
# Note that, while some of the below options could be turned into boot
# parameters, to optimize for the common use-case, we avoid this because: (a)
# it would impact performance (and we want to avoid static branch for all
--
2.25.0.rc1.283.g88dfdc4193-goog

2020-01-09 20:32:10

by Marco Elver

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rcu 0/2] kcsan: Improvements to reporting

On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 17:27, Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 04:23:20PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> > Improvements to KCSAN data race reporting:
> > 1. Show if access is marked (*_ONCE, atomic, etc.).
> > 2. Rate limit reporting to avoid spamming console.
> >
> > Marco Elver (2):
> > kcsan: Show full access type in report
> > kcsan: Rate-limit reporting per data races
>
> Queued and pushed, thank you! I edited the commit logs a bit, so could
> you please check to make sure that I didn't mess anything up?

Looks good to me, thank you.

> At some point, boot-time-allocated per-CPU arrays might be needed to
> avoid contention on large systems, but one step at a time. ;-)

I certainly hope the rate of fixing/avoiding data races will not be
eclipsed by the rate at which new ones are introduced. :-)

Thanks,
-- Marco

> Thanx, Paul
>
> > kernel/kcsan/core.c | 15 +++--
> > kernel/kcsan/kcsan.h | 2 +-
> > kernel/kcsan/report.c | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > lib/Kconfig.kcsan | 10 +++
> > 4 files changed, 148 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> >
> > --
> > 2.25.0.rc1.283.g88dfdc4193-goog
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "kasan-dev" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kasan-dev/20200109162739.GS13449%40paulmck-ThinkPad-P72.

2020-01-09 20:37:50

by Paul E. McKenney

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rcu 0/2] kcsan: Improvements to reporting

On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 06:03:39PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 17:27, Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 04:23:20PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> > > Improvements to KCSAN data race reporting:
> > > 1. Show if access is marked (*_ONCE, atomic, etc.).
> > > 2. Rate limit reporting to avoid spamming console.
> > >
> > > Marco Elver (2):
> > > kcsan: Show full access type in report
> > > kcsan: Rate-limit reporting per data races
> >
> > Queued and pushed, thank you! I edited the commit logs a bit, so could
> > you please check to make sure that I didn't mess anything up?
>
> Looks good to me, thank you.
>
> > At some point, boot-time-allocated per-CPU arrays might be needed to
> > avoid contention on large systems, but one step at a time. ;-)
>
> I certainly hope the rate of fixing/avoiding data races will not be
> eclipsed by the rate at which new ones are introduced. :-)

Me too!

However, on a large system, duplicate reports might happen quite
frequently, which might cause slowdowns given the single global
array. Or maybe not -- I guess we will find out soon enough. ;-)

But I must confess that I am missing how concurrent access to the
report_times[] array is handled. I would have expected that
rate_limit_report() would choose a random starting entry and
search circularly. And I would expect that the code at the end
of that function would instead look something like this:

if (ktime_before(oldtime, invalid_before) &&
cmpxchg(&use_entry->time, oldtime, now) == oldtime) {
use_entry->frame1 = frame1;
use_entry->frame2 = frame2;
} else {
// Too bad, next duplicate report won't be suppressed.
}

Where "oldtime" is captured from the entry during the scan, and from the
first entry scanned. This cmpxchg() approach is of course vulnerable
to the ->frame1 and ->frame2 assignments taking more than three seconds
(by default), but if that becomes a problem, a WARN_ON() could be added:

if (ktime_before(oldtime, invalid_before) &&
cmpxchg(&use_entry->time, oldtime, now) == oldtime) {
use_entry->frame1 = frame1;
use_entry->frame2 = frame2;
WARN_ON_ONCE(use_entry->time != now);
} else {
// Too bad, next duplicate report won't be suppressed.
}

So what am I missing here?

Thanx, Paul

> Thanks,
> -- Marco
>
> > Thanx, Paul
> >
> > > kernel/kcsan/core.c | 15 +++--
> > > kernel/kcsan/kcsan.h | 2 +-
> > > kernel/kcsan/report.c | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > > lib/Kconfig.kcsan | 10 +++
> > > 4 files changed, 148 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.25.0.rc1.283.g88dfdc4193-goog
> > >
> >
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "kasan-dev" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
> > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kasan-dev/20200109162739.GS13449%40paulmck-ThinkPad-P72.

2020-01-09 20:39:14

by Marco Elver

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rcu 0/2] kcsan: Improvements to reporting

On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 18:31, Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 06:03:39PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 17:27, Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 04:23:20PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> > > > Improvements to KCSAN data race reporting:
> > > > 1. Show if access is marked (*_ONCE, atomic, etc.).
> > > > 2. Rate limit reporting to avoid spamming console.
> > > >
> > > > Marco Elver (2):
> > > > kcsan: Show full access type in report
> > > > kcsan: Rate-limit reporting per data races
> > >
> > > Queued and pushed, thank you! I edited the commit logs a bit, so could
> > > you please check to make sure that I didn't mess anything up?
> >
> > Looks good to me, thank you.
> >
> > > At some point, boot-time-allocated per-CPU arrays might be needed to
> > > avoid contention on large systems, but one step at a time. ;-)
> >
> > I certainly hope the rate of fixing/avoiding data races will not be
> > eclipsed by the rate at which new ones are introduced. :-)
>
> Me too!
>
> However, on a large system, duplicate reports might happen quite
> frequently, which might cause slowdowns given the single global
> array. Or maybe not -- I guess we will find out soon enough. ;-)
>
> But I must confess that I am missing how concurrent access to the
> report_times[] array is handled. I would have expected that
> rate_limit_report() would choose a random starting entry and
> search circularly. And I would expect that the code at the end
> of that function would instead look something like this:
>
> if (ktime_before(oldtime, invalid_before) &&
> cmpxchg(&use_entry->time, oldtime, now) == oldtime) {
> use_entry->frame1 = frame1;
> use_entry->frame2 = frame2;
> } else {
> // Too bad, next duplicate report won't be suppressed.
> }
>
> Where "oldtime" is captured from the entry during the scan, and from the
> first entry scanned. This cmpxchg() approach is of course vulnerable
> to the ->frame1 and ->frame2 assignments taking more than three seconds
> (by default), but if that becomes a problem, a WARN_ON() could be added:
>
> if (ktime_before(oldtime, invalid_before) &&
> cmpxchg(&use_entry->time, oldtime, now) == oldtime) {
> use_entry->frame1 = frame1;
> use_entry->frame2 = frame2;
> WARN_ON_ONCE(use_entry->time != now);
> } else {
> // Too bad, next duplicate report won't be suppressed.
> }
>
> So what am I missing here?

Ah right, sorry, I should have clarified or commented in the code that
all of this is happening under 'report_lock' (taken in prepare_report,
held in print_report->rate_limit_report, released in release_report).
That also means that any optimization here won't matter until
report_lock is removed.

Thanks,
-- Marco

> Thanx, Paul
>
> > Thanks,
> > -- Marco
> >
> > > Thanx, Paul
> > >
> > > > kernel/kcsan/core.c | 15 +++--
> > > > kernel/kcsan/kcsan.h | 2 +-
> > > > kernel/kcsan/report.c | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > > > lib/Kconfig.kcsan | 10 +++
> > > > 4 files changed, 148 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > 2.25.0.rc1.283.g88dfdc4193-goog
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "kasan-dev" group.
> > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
> > > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kasan-dev/20200109162739.GS13449%40paulmck-ThinkPad-P72.

2020-01-09 20:57:22

by Paul E. McKenney

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rcu 0/2] kcsan: Improvements to reporting

On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 06:42:16PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 18:31, Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 06:03:39PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> > > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 17:27, Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 04:23:20PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> > > > > Improvements to KCSAN data race reporting:
> > > > > 1. Show if access is marked (*_ONCE, atomic, etc.).
> > > > > 2. Rate limit reporting to avoid spamming console.
> > > > >
> > > > > Marco Elver (2):
> > > > > kcsan: Show full access type in report
> > > > > kcsan: Rate-limit reporting per data races
> > > >
> > > > Queued and pushed, thank you! I edited the commit logs a bit, so could
> > > > you please check to make sure that I didn't mess anything up?
> > >
> > > Looks good to me, thank you.
> > >
> > > > At some point, boot-time-allocated per-CPU arrays might be needed to
> > > > avoid contention on large systems, but one step at a time. ;-)
> > >
> > > I certainly hope the rate of fixing/avoiding data races will not be
> > > eclipsed by the rate at which new ones are introduced. :-)
> >
> > Me too!
> >
> > However, on a large system, duplicate reports might happen quite
> > frequently, which might cause slowdowns given the single global
> > array. Or maybe not -- I guess we will find out soon enough. ;-)
> >
> > But I must confess that I am missing how concurrent access to the
> > report_times[] array is handled. I would have expected that
> > rate_limit_report() would choose a random starting entry and
> > search circularly. And I would expect that the code at the end
> > of that function would instead look something like this:
> >
> > if (ktime_before(oldtime, invalid_before) &&
> > cmpxchg(&use_entry->time, oldtime, now) == oldtime) {
> > use_entry->frame1 = frame1;
> > use_entry->frame2 = frame2;
> > } else {
> > // Too bad, next duplicate report won't be suppressed.
> > }
> >
> > Where "oldtime" is captured from the entry during the scan, and from the
> > first entry scanned. This cmpxchg() approach is of course vulnerable
> > to the ->frame1 and ->frame2 assignments taking more than three seconds
> > (by default), but if that becomes a problem, a WARN_ON() could be added:
> >
> > if (ktime_before(oldtime, invalid_before) &&
> > cmpxchg(&use_entry->time, oldtime, now) == oldtime) {
> > use_entry->frame1 = frame1;
> > use_entry->frame2 = frame2;
> > WARN_ON_ONCE(use_entry->time != now);
> > } else {
> > // Too bad, next duplicate report won't be suppressed.
> > }
> >
> > So what am I missing here?
>
> Ah right, sorry, I should have clarified or commented in the code that
> all of this is happening under 'report_lock' (taken in prepare_report,
> held in print_report->rate_limit_report, released in release_report).
> That also means that any optimization here won't matter until
> report_lock is removed.

Got it, thank you! And yes, lock contention on report_lock might be
a problem on large systems. But let's see how it goes.

Thanx, Paul

> Thanks,
> -- Marco
>
> > Thanx, Paul
> >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -- Marco
> > >
> > > > Thanx, Paul
> > > >
> > > > > kernel/kcsan/core.c | 15 +++--
> > > > > kernel/kcsan/kcsan.h | 2 +-
> > > > > kernel/kcsan/report.c | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> > > > > lib/Kconfig.kcsan | 10 +++
> > > > > 4 files changed, 148 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > 2.25.0.rc1.283.g88dfdc4193-goog
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "kasan-dev" group.
> > > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected].
> > > > To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/kasan-dev/20200109162739.GS13449%40paulmck-ThinkPad-P72.

2020-01-09 21:00:29

by Paul E. McKenney

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rcu 0/2] kcsan: Improvements to reporting

On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 04:23:20PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> Improvements to KCSAN data race reporting:
> 1. Show if access is marked (*_ONCE, atomic, etc.).
> 2. Rate limit reporting to avoid spamming console.
>
> Marco Elver (2):
> kcsan: Show full access type in report
> kcsan: Rate-limit reporting per data races

Queued and pushed, thank you! I edited the commit logs a bit, so could
you please check to make sure that I didn't mess anything up?

At some point, boot-time-allocated per-CPU arrays might be needed to
avoid contention on large systems, but one step at a time. ;-)

Thanx, Paul

> kernel/kcsan/core.c | 15 +++--
> kernel/kcsan/kcsan.h | 2 +-
> kernel/kcsan/report.c | 153 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> lib/Kconfig.kcsan | 10 +++
> 4 files changed, 148 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.25.0.rc1.283.g88dfdc4193-goog
>

2020-01-10 18:22:33

by Marco Elver

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rcu 2/2] kcsan: Rate-limit reporting per data races

On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 16:23, Marco Elver <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Adds support for rate limiting reports. This uses a time based rate
> limit, that limits any given data race report to no more than one in a
> fixed time window (default is 3 sec). This should prevent the console
> from being spammed with data race reports, that would render the system
> unusable.
>
> The implementation assumes that unique data races and the rate at which
> they occur is bounded, since we cannot store arbitrarily many past data
> race report information: we use a fixed-size array to store the required
> information. We cannot use kmalloc/krealloc and resize the list when
> needed, as reporting is triggered by the instrumentation calls; to
> permit using KCSAN on the allocators, we cannot (re-)allocate any memory
> during report generation (data races in the allocators lead to
> deadlock).
>
> Reported-by: Qian Cai <[email protected]>
> Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <[email protected]>
> ---
> kernel/kcsan/report.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> lib/Kconfig.kcsan | 10 ++++
> 2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kcsan/report.c b/kernel/kcsan/report.c
> index 9f503ca2ff7a..e324af7d14c9 100644
> --- a/kernel/kcsan/report.c
> +++ b/kernel/kcsan/report.c
> @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>
> #include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/ktime.h>
> #include <linux/preempt.h>
> #include <linux/printk.h>
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> @@ -31,12 +32,101 @@ static struct {
> int num_stack_entries;
> } other_info = { .ptr = NULL };
>
> +/*
> + * Information about reported data races; used to rate limit reporting.
> + */
> +struct report_time {
> + /*
> + * The last time the data race was reported.
> + */
> + ktime_t time;
> +
> + /*
> + * The frames of the 2 threads; if only 1 thread is known, one frame
> + * will be 0.
> + */
> + unsigned long frame1;
> + unsigned long frame2;
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Since we also want to be able to debug allocators with KCSAN, to avoid
> + * deadlock, report_times cannot be dynamically resized with krealloc in
> + * rate_limit_report.
> + *
> + * Therefore, we use a fixed-size array, which at most will occupy a page. This
> + * still adequately rate limits reports, assuming that a) number of unique data
> + * races is not excessive, and b) occurrence of unique data races within the
> + * same time window is limited.
> + */
> +#define REPORT_TIMES_MAX (PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct report_time))
> +#define REPORT_TIMES_SIZE \
> + (CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS > REPORT_TIMES_MAX ? \
> + REPORT_TIMES_MAX : \
> + CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS)
> +static struct report_time report_times[REPORT_TIMES_SIZE];
> +
> /*
> * This spinlock protects reporting and other_info, since other_info is usually
> * required when reporting.
> */
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(report_lock);
>
> +/*
> + * Checks if the data race identified by thread frames frame1 and frame2 has
> + * been reported since (now - KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS).
> + */
> +static bool rate_limit_report(unsigned long frame1, unsigned long frame2)
> +{
> + struct report_time *use_entry = &report_times[0];
> + ktime_t now;
> + ktime_t invalid_before;
> + int i;
> +
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS != 0 && REPORT_TIMES_SIZE == 0);
> +
> + if (CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS == 0)
> + return false;
> +
> + now = ktime_get();
> + invalid_before = ktime_sub_ms(now, CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS);

Been thinking about this a bit more, and wondering if we should just
use jiffies here? Don't think we need the precision.

Thanks,
-- Marco

> + /* Check if a matching data race report exists. */
> + for (i = 0; i < REPORT_TIMES_SIZE; ++i) {
> + struct report_time *rt = &report_times[i];
> +
> + /*
> + * Must always select an entry for use to store info as we
> + * cannot resize report_times; at the end of the scan, use_entry
> + * will be the oldest entry, which ideally also happened before
> + * KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS ago.
> + */
> + if (ktime_before(rt->time, use_entry->time))
> + use_entry = rt;
> +
> + /*
> + * Initially, no need to check any further as this entry as well
> + * as following entries have never been used.
> + */
> + if (rt->time == 0)
> + break;
> +
> + /* Check if entry expired. */
> + if (ktime_before(rt->time, invalid_before))
> + continue; /* before KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS ago */
> +
> + /* Reported recently, check if data race matches. */
> + if ((rt->frame1 == frame1 && rt->frame2 == frame2) ||
> + (rt->frame1 == frame2 && rt->frame2 == frame1))
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + use_entry->time = now;
> + use_entry->frame1 = frame1;
> + use_entry->frame2 = frame2;
> + return false;
> +}
> +
> /*
> * Special rules to skip reporting.
> */
> @@ -132,7 +222,9 @@ static bool print_report(const volatile void *ptr, size_t size, int access_type,
> unsigned long stack_entries[NUM_STACK_ENTRIES] = { 0 };
> int num_stack_entries = stack_trace_save(stack_entries, NUM_STACK_ENTRIES, 1);
> int skipnr = get_stack_skipnr(stack_entries, num_stack_entries);
> - int other_skipnr;
> + unsigned long this_frame = stack_entries[skipnr];
> + unsigned long other_frame = 0;
> + int other_skipnr = 0; /* silence uninit warnings */
>
> /*
> * Must check report filter rules before starting to print.
> @@ -143,34 +235,34 @@ static bool print_report(const volatile void *ptr, size_t size, int access_type,
> if (type == KCSAN_REPORT_RACE_SIGNAL) {
> other_skipnr = get_stack_skipnr(other_info.stack_entries,
> other_info.num_stack_entries);
> + other_frame = other_info.stack_entries[other_skipnr];
>
> /* @value_change is only known for the other thread */
> - if (skip_report(other_info.access_type, value_change,
> - other_info.stack_entries[other_skipnr]))
> + if (skip_report(other_info.access_type, value_change, other_frame))
> return false;
> }
>
> + if (rate_limit_report(this_frame, other_frame))
> + return false;
> +
> /* Print report header. */
> pr_err("==================================================================\n");
> switch (type) {
> case KCSAN_REPORT_RACE_SIGNAL: {
> - void *this_fn = (void *)stack_entries[skipnr];
> - void *other_fn = (void *)other_info.stack_entries[other_skipnr];
> int cmp;
>
> /*
> * Order functions lexographically for consistent bug titles.
> * Do not print offset of functions to keep title short.
> */
> - cmp = sym_strcmp(other_fn, this_fn);
> + cmp = sym_strcmp((void *)other_frame, (void *)this_frame);
> pr_err("BUG: KCSAN: data-race in %ps / %ps\n",
> - cmp < 0 ? other_fn : this_fn,
> - cmp < 0 ? this_fn : other_fn);
> + (void *)(cmp < 0 ? other_frame : this_frame),
> + (void *)(cmp < 0 ? this_frame : other_frame));
> } break;
>
> case KCSAN_REPORT_RACE_UNKNOWN_ORIGIN:
> - pr_err("BUG: KCSAN: data-race in %pS\n",
> - (void *)stack_entries[skipnr]);
> + pr_err("BUG: KCSAN: data-race in %pS\n", (void *)this_frame);
> break;
>
> default:
> diff --git a/lib/Kconfig.kcsan b/lib/Kconfig.kcsan
> index 3f78b1434375..3552990abcfe 100644
> --- a/lib/Kconfig.kcsan
> +++ b/lib/Kconfig.kcsan
> @@ -81,6 +81,16 @@ config KCSAN_SKIP_WATCH_RANDOMIZE
> KCSAN_WATCH_SKIP. If false, the chosen value is always
> KCSAN_WATCH_SKIP.
>
> +config KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS
> + int "Duration in milliseconds, in which any given data race is only reported once"
> + default 3000
> + help
> + Any given data race is only reported once in the defined time window.
> + Different data races may still generate reports within a duration
> + that is smaller than the duration defined here. This allows rate
> + limiting reporting to avoid flooding the console with reports.
> + Setting this to 0 disables rate limiting.
> +
> # Note that, while some of the below options could be turned into boot
> # parameters, to optimize for the common use-case, we avoid this because: (a)
> # it would impact performance (and we want to avoid static branch for all
> --
> 2.25.0.rc1.283.g88dfdc4193-goog
>

2020-01-10 18:57:02

by Marco Elver

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rcu 2/2] kcsan: Rate-limit reporting per data races

On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 at 19:20, Marco Elver <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 16:23, Marco Elver <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Adds support for rate limiting reports. This uses a time based rate
> > limit, that limits any given data race report to no more than one in a
> > fixed time window (default is 3 sec). This should prevent the console
> > from being spammed with data race reports, that would render the system
> > unusable.
> >
> > The implementation assumes that unique data races and the rate at which
> > they occur is bounded, since we cannot store arbitrarily many past data
> > race report information: we use a fixed-size array to store the required
> > information. We cannot use kmalloc/krealloc and resize the list when
> > needed, as reporting is triggered by the instrumentation calls; to
> > permit using KCSAN on the allocators, we cannot (re-)allocate any memory
> > during report generation (data races in the allocators lead to
> > deadlock).
> >
> > Reported-by: Qian Cai <[email protected]>
> > Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > kernel/kcsan/report.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > lib/Kconfig.kcsan | 10 ++++
> > 2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/kcsan/report.c b/kernel/kcsan/report.c
> > index 9f503ca2ff7a..e324af7d14c9 100644
> > --- a/kernel/kcsan/report.c
> > +++ b/kernel/kcsan/report.c
> > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> >
> > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/ktime.h>
> > #include <linux/preempt.h>
> > #include <linux/printk.h>
> > #include <linux/sched.h>
> > @@ -31,12 +32,101 @@ static struct {
> > int num_stack_entries;
> > } other_info = { .ptr = NULL };
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Information about reported data races; used to rate limit reporting.
> > + */
> > +struct report_time {
> > + /*
> > + * The last time the data race was reported.
> > + */
> > + ktime_t time;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * The frames of the 2 threads; if only 1 thread is known, one frame
> > + * will be 0.
> > + */
> > + unsigned long frame1;
> > + unsigned long frame2;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Since we also want to be able to debug allocators with KCSAN, to avoid
> > + * deadlock, report_times cannot be dynamically resized with krealloc in
> > + * rate_limit_report.
> > + *
> > + * Therefore, we use a fixed-size array, which at most will occupy a page. This
> > + * still adequately rate limits reports, assuming that a) number of unique data
> > + * races is not excessive, and b) occurrence of unique data races within the
> > + * same time window is limited.
> > + */
> > +#define REPORT_TIMES_MAX (PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct report_time))
> > +#define REPORT_TIMES_SIZE \
> > + (CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS > REPORT_TIMES_MAX ? \
> > + REPORT_TIMES_MAX : \
> > + CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS)
> > +static struct report_time report_times[REPORT_TIMES_SIZE];
> > +
> > /*
> > * This spinlock protects reporting and other_info, since other_info is usually
> > * required when reporting.
> > */
> > static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(report_lock);
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Checks if the data race identified by thread frames frame1 and frame2 has
> > + * been reported since (now - KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS).
> > + */
> > +static bool rate_limit_report(unsigned long frame1, unsigned long frame2)
> > +{
> > + struct report_time *use_entry = &report_times[0];
> > + ktime_t now;
> > + ktime_t invalid_before;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + BUILD_BUG_ON(CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS != 0 && REPORT_TIMES_SIZE == 0);
> > +
> > + if (CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS == 0)
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + now = ktime_get();
> > + invalid_before = ktime_sub_ms(now, CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS);
>
> Been thinking about this a bit more, and wondering if we should just
> use jiffies here? Don't think we need the precision.

Sent v2: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
I think it's also safer to use jiffies, as noted in the v2 patch.

Paul: sorry for sending v2, seeing you already had these in your tree.
Hope this is ok.

Thanks,
-- Marco

2020-01-11 05:14:41

by Paul E. McKenney

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH -rcu 2/2] kcsan: Rate-limit reporting per data races

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 07:54:09PM +0100, Marco Elver wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jan 2020 at 19:20, Marco Elver <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 9 Jan 2020 at 16:23, Marco Elver <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >
> > > Adds support for rate limiting reports. This uses a time based rate
> > > limit, that limits any given data race report to no more than one in a
> > > fixed time window (default is 3 sec). This should prevent the console
> > > from being spammed with data race reports, that would render the system
> > > unusable.
> > >
> > > The implementation assumes that unique data races and the rate at which
> > > they occur is bounded, since we cannot store arbitrarily many past data
> > > race report information: we use a fixed-size array to store the required
> > > information. We cannot use kmalloc/krealloc and resize the list when
> > > needed, as reporting is triggered by the instrumentation calls; to
> > > permit using KCSAN on the allocators, we cannot (re-)allocate any memory
> > > during report generation (data races in the allocators lead to
> > > deadlock).
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Qian Cai <[email protected]>
> > > Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <[email protected]>
> > > Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <[email protected]>
> > > ---
> > > kernel/kcsan/report.c | 112 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > lib/Kconfig.kcsan | 10 ++++
> > > 2 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/kernel/kcsan/report.c b/kernel/kcsan/report.c
> > > index 9f503ca2ff7a..e324af7d14c9 100644
> > > --- a/kernel/kcsan/report.c
> > > +++ b/kernel/kcsan/report.c
> > > @@ -1,6 +1,7 @@
> > > // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > >
> > > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > > +#include <linux/ktime.h>
> > > #include <linux/preempt.h>
> > > #include <linux/printk.h>
> > > #include <linux/sched.h>
> > > @@ -31,12 +32,101 @@ static struct {
> > > int num_stack_entries;
> > > } other_info = { .ptr = NULL };
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + * Information about reported data races; used to rate limit reporting.
> > > + */
> > > +struct report_time {
> > > + /*
> > > + * The last time the data race was reported.
> > > + */
> > > + ktime_t time;
> > > +
> > > + /*
> > > + * The frames of the 2 threads; if only 1 thread is known, one frame
> > > + * will be 0.
> > > + */
> > > + unsigned long frame1;
> > > + unsigned long frame2;
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +/*
> > > + * Since we also want to be able to debug allocators with KCSAN, to avoid
> > > + * deadlock, report_times cannot be dynamically resized with krealloc in
> > > + * rate_limit_report.
> > > + *
> > > + * Therefore, we use a fixed-size array, which at most will occupy a page. This
> > > + * still adequately rate limits reports, assuming that a) number of unique data
> > > + * races is not excessive, and b) occurrence of unique data races within the
> > > + * same time window is limited.
> > > + */
> > > +#define REPORT_TIMES_MAX (PAGE_SIZE / sizeof(struct report_time))
> > > +#define REPORT_TIMES_SIZE \
> > > + (CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS > REPORT_TIMES_MAX ? \
> > > + REPORT_TIMES_MAX : \
> > > + CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS)
> > > +static struct report_time report_times[REPORT_TIMES_SIZE];
> > > +
> > > /*
> > > * This spinlock protects reporting and other_info, since other_info is usually
> > > * required when reporting.
> > > */
> > > static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(report_lock);
> > >
> > > +/*
> > > + * Checks if the data race identified by thread frames frame1 and frame2 has
> > > + * been reported since (now - KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS).
> > > + */
> > > +static bool rate_limit_report(unsigned long frame1, unsigned long frame2)
> > > +{
> > > + struct report_time *use_entry = &report_times[0];
> > > + ktime_t now;
> > > + ktime_t invalid_before;
> > > + int i;
> > > +
> > > + BUILD_BUG_ON(CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS != 0 && REPORT_TIMES_SIZE == 0);
> > > +
> > > + if (CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS == 0)
> > > + return false;
> > > +
> > > + now = ktime_get();
> > > + invalid_before = ktime_sub_ms(now, CONFIG_KCSAN_REPORT_ONCE_IN_MS);
> >
> > Been thinking about this a bit more, and wondering if we should just
> > use jiffies here? Don't think we need the precision.
>
> Sent v2: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
> I think it's also safer to use jiffies, as noted in the v2 patch.
>
> Paul: sorry for sending v2, seeing you already had these in your tree.
> Hope this is ok.

Not a problem! Pulling in the replacements shortly.

Thanx, Paul