md5sig->head maybe traversed using hlist_for_each_entry_rcu
outside an RCU read-side critical section but under the protection
of socket lock.
Hence, add corresponding lockdep expression to silence false-positive
warnings, and harden RCU lists.
Signed-off-by: Amol Grover <[email protected]>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
index 1c7326e04f9b..6519429f32cd 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_ipv4.c
@@ -1000,7 +1000,8 @@ struct tcp_md5sig_key *__tcp_md5_do_lookup(const struct sock *sk,
if (!md5sig)
return NULL;
- hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(key, &md5sig->head, node) {
+ hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(key, &md5sig->head, node,
+ lockdep_sock_is_held(sk)) {
if (key->family != family)
continue;
@@ -1043,7 +1044,8 @@ static struct tcp_md5sig_key *tcp_md5_do_lookup_exact(const struct sock *sk,
if (family == AF_INET6)
size = sizeof(struct in6_addr);
#endif
- hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(key, &md5sig->head, node) {
+ hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(key, &md5sig->head, node,
+ lockdep_sock_is_held(sk)) {
if (key->family != family)
continue;
if (!memcmp(&key->addr, addr, size) &&
--
2.24.1
netdev was not CC:'d on this patch, please resend with that fixed.
Thank you.
On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 08:19:58AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
>
> netdev was not CC:'d on this patch, please resend with that fixed.
>
Sorry for that. I've resend the patch.
Thanks
Amol
> Thank you.