Signed-off-by: Tomer Maimon <[email protected]>
---
drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c | 19 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c
index 84a728af6664..bd38bf1ee6a1 100644
--- a/drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c
+++ b/drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c
@@ -123,30 +123,29 @@ static int npcm_wdt_stop(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
return 0;
}
-
static int npcm_wdt_set_timeout(struct watchdog_device *wdd,
unsigned int timeout)
{
if (timeout < 2)
wdd->timeout = 1;
else if (timeout < 3)
- wdd->timeout = 2;
+ wdd->timeout = 2;
else if (timeout < 6)
- wdd->timeout = 5;
+ wdd->timeout = 5;
else if (timeout < 11)
- wdd->timeout = 10;
+ wdd->timeout = 10;
else if (timeout < 22)
- wdd->timeout = 21;
+ wdd->timeout = 21;
else if (timeout < 44)
- wdd->timeout = 43;
+ wdd->timeout = 43;
else if (timeout < 87)
- wdd->timeout = 86;
+ wdd->timeout = 86;
else if (timeout < 173)
- wdd->timeout = 172;
+ wdd->timeout = 172;
else if (timeout < 688)
- wdd->timeout = 687;
+ wdd->timeout = 687;
else
- wdd->timeout = 2750;
+ wdd->timeout = 2750;
if (watchdog_active(wdd))
npcm_wdt_start(wdd);
--
2.22.0
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 12:01:14PM +0200, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Tomer Maimon <[email protected]>
Turns out this problem does not actually exist in the upstream driver
(as of v5.6-rc4). You might want to align your code with the upstream
kernel.
Guenter
> ---
> drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c | 19 +++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c
> index 84a728af6664..bd38bf1ee6a1 100644
> --- a/drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c
> +++ b/drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c
> @@ -123,30 +123,29 @@ static int npcm_wdt_stop(struct watchdog_device *wdd)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -
> static int npcm_wdt_set_timeout(struct watchdog_device *wdd,
> unsigned int timeout)
> {
> if (timeout < 2)
> wdd->timeout = 1;
> else if (timeout < 3)
> - wdd->timeout = 2;
> + wdd->timeout = 2;
> else if (timeout < 6)
> - wdd->timeout = 5;
> + wdd->timeout = 5;
> else if (timeout < 11)
> - wdd->timeout = 10;
> + wdd->timeout = 10;
> else if (timeout < 22)
> - wdd->timeout = 21;
> + wdd->timeout = 21;
> else if (timeout < 44)
> - wdd->timeout = 43;
> + wdd->timeout = 43;
> else if (timeout < 87)
> - wdd->timeout = 86;
> + wdd->timeout = 86;
> else if (timeout < 173)
> - wdd->timeout = 172;
> + wdd->timeout = 172;
> else if (timeout < 688)
> - wdd->timeout = 687;
> + wdd->timeout = 687;
> else
> - wdd->timeout = 2750;
> + wdd->timeout = 2750;
>
> if (watchdog_active(wdd))
> npcm_wdt_start(wdd);
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 10:18:12AM +0200, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> I still see the whitespaces warning in v5.6-rc4
>
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c#L106
>
You are corerct, sorry. No idea what I looked at yesterday.
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <[email protected]>
>
> bash-4.2$ ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --strict --file
> drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c
> CHECK: Please don't use multiple blank lines
> #106: FILE: drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c:106:
> +
> +
>
> WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (8, 14)
> #112: FILE: drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c:112:
> + else if (timeout < 3)
> + wdd->timeout = 2;
>
> WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (8, 14)
> #114: FILE: drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c:114:
> + else if (timeout < 6)
> + wdd->timeout = 5;
>
> WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (8, 14)
> #116: FILE: drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c:116:
> + else if (timeout < 11)
> + wdd->timeout = 10;
>
> WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (8, 14)
> #118: FILE: drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c:118:
> + else if (timeout < 22)
> + wdd->timeout = 21;
>
> WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (8, 14)
> #120: FILE: drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c:120:
> + else if (timeout < 44)
> + wdd->timeout = 43;
>
> WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (8, 14)
> #122: FILE: drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c:122:
> + else if (timeout < 87)
> + wdd->timeout = 86;
>
> WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (8, 14)
> #124: FILE: drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c:124:
> + else if (timeout < 173)
> + wdd->timeout = 172;
>
> WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (8, 14)
> #126: FILE: drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c:126:
> + else if (timeout < 688)
> + wdd->timeout = 687;
>
> WARNING: suspect code indent for conditional statements (8, 14)
> #128: FILE: drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c:128:
> + else
> + wdd->timeout = 2750;
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tomer
>
> On Tue, 3 Mar 2020 at 23:25, Guenter Roeck <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 12:01:14PM +0200, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> > > Signed-off-by: Tomer Maimon <[email protected]>
> >
> > Turns out this problem does not actually exist in the upstream driver
> > (as of v5.6-rc4). You might want to align your code with the upstream
> > kernel.
> >
> > Guenter
> >
> > > ---
> > > drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c | 19 +++++++++----------
> > > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c b/drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c
> > > index 84a728af6664..bd38bf1ee6a1 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/watchdog/npcm_wdt.c
> > > @@ -123,30 +123,29 @@ static int npcm_wdt_stop(struct watchdog_device
> > *wdd)
> > > return 0;
> > > }
> > >
> > > -
> > > static int npcm_wdt_set_timeout(struct watchdog_device *wdd,
> > > unsigned int timeout)
> > > {
> > > if (timeout < 2)
> > > wdd->timeout = 1;
> > > else if (timeout < 3)
> > > - wdd->timeout = 2;
> > > + wdd->timeout = 2;
> > > else if (timeout < 6)
> > > - wdd->timeout = 5;
> > > + wdd->timeout = 5;
> > > else if (timeout < 11)
> > > - wdd->timeout = 10;
> > > + wdd->timeout = 10;
> > > else if (timeout < 22)
> > > - wdd->timeout = 21;
> > > + wdd->timeout = 21;
> > > else if (timeout < 44)
> > > - wdd->timeout = 43;
> > > + wdd->timeout = 43;
> > > else if (timeout < 87)
> > > - wdd->timeout = 86;
> > > + wdd->timeout = 86;
> > > else if (timeout < 173)
> > > - wdd->timeout = 172;
> > > + wdd->timeout = 172;
> > > else if (timeout < 688)
> > > - wdd->timeout = 687;
> > > + wdd->timeout = 687;
> > > else
> > > - wdd->timeout = 2750;
> > > + wdd->timeout = 2750;
> > >
> > > if (watchdog_active(wdd))
> > > npcm_wdt_start(wdd);
> >