2020-03-13 06:46:50

by Andreas Kemnade

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH RESEND v6 4/7] mfd: rn5t618: add more subdevices

Since the RC5T619 has a RTC, use a separate subdevice list for that.
The ADC should be the same as in the RN5T618, according to drivers
in the wild, but since it is not tested, the ADC is only added for
the RC5T619.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v6:
- squashed with patch from former ADC patchset

Changes in v3:
- alignment cleanup
drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c b/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c
index 30fed9ab3d04..321836f78120 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <linux/mfd/rn5t618.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/reboot.h>
#include <linux/regmap.h>

@@ -22,6 +23,13 @@ static const struct mfd_cell rn5t618_cells[] = {
{ .name = "rn5t618-wdt" },
};

+static const struct mfd_cell rc5t619_cells[] = {
+ { .name = "rn5t618-adc" },
+ { .name = "rn5t618-regulator" },
+ { .name = "rc5t619-rtc" },
+ { .name = "rn5t618-wdt" },
+};
+
static bool rn5t618_volatile_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
{
switch (reg) {
@@ -174,8 +182,16 @@ static int rn5t618_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
return ret;
}

- ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&i2c->dev, -1, rn5t618_cells,
- ARRAY_SIZE(rn5t618_cells), NULL, 0, NULL);
+ if (priv->variant == RC5T619)
+ ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&i2c->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
+ rc5t619_cells,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(rc5t619_cells),
+ NULL, 0, NULL);
+ else
+ ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&i2c->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
+ rn5t618_cells,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(rn5t618_cells),
+ NULL, 0, NULL);
if (ret) {
dev_err(&i2c->dev, "failed to add sub-devices: %d\n", ret);
return ret;
--
2.20.1