request_irq() is preferred over setup_irq(). Invocations of setup_irq()
occur after memory allocators are ready.
Per tglx[1], setup_irq() existed in olden days when allocators were not
ready by the time early interrupts were initialized.
Hence replace setup_irq() by request_irq().
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.20.1710191609480.1971@nanos
Signed-off-by: afzal mohammed <[email protected]>
---
Hi hexagon maintainers,
if okay w/ this change, please consider taking it thr' your tree, else please
let me know.
Regards
afzal
Link to v2 & v1,
[v2] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
[v1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/[email protected]
v3:
* Split out from tree wide series, as Thomas suggested to get it thr'
respective maintainers
* Modify pr_err displayed in case of error
* Re-arrange code & choose pr_err args as required to improve readability
* Remove irrelevant parts from commit message & improve
v2:
* Replace pr_err("request_irq() on %s failed" by
pr_err("%s: request_irq() failed"
* Commit message massage
arch/hexagon/kernel/smp.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
arch/hexagon/kernel/time.c | 11 +++--------
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/hexagon/kernel/smp.c b/arch/hexagon/kernel/smp.c
index 0bbbe652a513..619c56420aa0 100644
--- a/arch/hexagon/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/hexagon/kernel/smp.c
@@ -114,12 +114,6 @@ void send_ipi(const struct cpumask *cpumask, enum ipi_message_type msg)
local_irq_restore(flags);
}
-static struct irqaction ipi_intdesc = {
- .handler = handle_ipi,
- .flags = IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING,
- .name = "ipi_handler"
-};
-
void __init smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
{
}
@@ -132,8 +126,8 @@ void __init smp_prepare_boot_cpu(void)
void start_secondary(void)
{
- unsigned int cpu;
unsigned long thread_ptr;
+ unsigned int cpu, irq;
/* Calculate thread_info pointer from stack pointer */
__asm__ __volatile__(
@@ -155,7 +149,10 @@ void start_secondary(void)
cpu = smp_processor_id();
- setup_irq(BASE_IPI_IRQ + cpu, &ipi_intdesc);
+ irq = BASE_IPI_IRQ + cpu;
+ if (request_irq(irq, handle_ipi, IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING, "ipi_handler",
+ NULL))
+ pr_err("Failed to request irq %u (ipi_handler)\n", irq);
/* Register the clock_event dummy */
setup_percpu_clockdev();
@@ -201,7 +198,7 @@ void __init smp_cpus_done(unsigned int max_cpus)
void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
{
- int i;
+ int i, irq = BASE_IPI_IRQ;
/*
* should eventually have some sort of machine
@@ -213,8 +210,11 @@ void __init smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
set_cpu_present(i, true);
/* Also need to register the interrupts for IPI */
- if (max_cpus > 1)
- setup_irq(BASE_IPI_IRQ, &ipi_intdesc);
+ if (max_cpus > 1) {
+ if (request_irq(irq, handle_ipi, IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING,
+ "ipi_handler", NULL))
+ pr_err("Failed to request irq %d (ipi_handler)\n", irq);
+ }
}
void smp_send_reschedule(int cpu)
diff --git a/arch/hexagon/kernel/time.c b/arch/hexagon/kernel/time.c
index f99e9257bed4..feffe527ac92 100644
--- a/arch/hexagon/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/hexagon/kernel/time.c
@@ -143,13 +143,6 @@ static irqreturn_t timer_interrupt(int irq, void *devid)
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
-/* This should also be pulled from devtree */
-static struct irqaction rtos_timer_intdesc = {
- .handler = timer_interrupt,
- .flags = IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING,
- .name = "rtos_timer"
-};
-
/*
* time_init_deferred - called by start_kernel to set up timer/clock source
*
@@ -163,6 +156,7 @@ void __init time_init_deferred(void)
{
struct resource *resource = NULL;
struct clock_event_device *ce_dev = &hexagon_clockevent_dev;
+ unsigned long flag = IRQF_TIMER | IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING;
ce_dev->cpumask = cpu_all_mask;
@@ -195,7 +189,8 @@ void __init time_init_deferred(void)
#endif
clockevents_register_device(ce_dev);
- setup_irq(ce_dev->irq, &rtos_timer_intdesc);
+ if (request_irq(ce_dev->irq, timer_interrupt, flag, "rtos_timer", NULL))
+ pr_err("Failed to register rtos_timer interrupt\n");
}
void __init time_init(void)
--
2.25.1
Hi Brian Cain,
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 06:19:09AM +0530, afzal mohammed wrote:
> Hi hexagon maintainers,
>
> if okay w/ this change, please consider taking it thr' your tree, else please
> let me know.
Per get_maintainers script, there are no maintainers, only a support
in you, seems you are not sedning pull requests for hexagon. If you
are okay w/ this change, can you please ack it so as to be routed via
tglx.
Regards
afzal