2020-03-20 08:12:13

by Andreas Kemnade

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v7 4/7] mfd: rn5t618: add more subdevices

Since the RC5T619 has a RTC, use a separate subdevice list for that.
The ADC should be the same as in the RN5T618, according to drivers
in the wild, but since it is not tested, the ADC is only added for
the RC5T619.

Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <[email protected]>
---
Changes in v6:
- squashed with patch from former ADC patchset

Changes in v3:
- alignment cleanup
drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c b/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c
index 7686cc36e8c0..bc117adede4c 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
#include <linux/mfd/rn5t618.h>
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of_device.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/reboot.h>
#include <linux/regmap.h>

@@ -22,6 +23,13 @@ static const struct mfd_cell rn5t618_cells[] = {
{ .name = "rn5t618-wdt" },
};

+static const struct mfd_cell rc5t619_cells[] = {
+ { .name = "rn5t618-adc" },
+ { .name = "rn5t618-regulator" },
+ { .name = "rc5t619-rtc" },
+ { .name = "rn5t618-wdt" },
+};
+
static bool rn5t618_volatile_reg(struct device *dev, unsigned int reg)
{
switch (reg) {
@@ -167,8 +175,16 @@ static int rn5t618_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
return ret;
}

- ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&i2c->dev, -1, rn5t618_cells,
- ARRAY_SIZE(rn5t618_cells), NULL, 0, NULL);
+ if (priv->variant == RC5T619)
+ ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&i2c->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
+ rc5t619_cells,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(rc5t619_cells),
+ NULL, 0, NULL);
+ else
+ ret = devm_mfd_add_devices(&i2c->dev, PLATFORM_DEVID_NONE,
+ rn5t618_cells,
+ ARRAY_SIZE(rn5t618_cells),
+ NULL, 0, NULL);
if (ret) {
dev_err(&i2c->dev, "failed to add sub-devices: %d\n", ret);
return ret;
--
2.20.1


2020-03-24 10:57:50

by Lee Jones

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 4/7] mfd: rn5t618: add more subdevices

On Fri, 20 Mar 2020, Andreas Kemnade wrote:

> Since the RC5T619 has a RTC, use a separate subdevice list for that.
> The ADC should be the same as in the RN5T618, according to drivers
> in the wild, but since it is not tested, the ADC is only added for
> the RC5T619.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Kemnade <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changes in v6:
> - squashed with patch from former ADC patchset
>
> Changes in v3:
> - alignment cleanup
> drivers/mfd/rn5t618.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

For my own reference:
Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]>

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog