From: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
Implement the callbacks to copy the processor state required by KVM to
the GHCB.
Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
[ [email protected]: - Split out of a larger patch
- Adapt to different callback functions ]
Co-developed-by: Joerg Roedel <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <[email protected]>
---
arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
index 6efe0410fb72..0e3fc798d719 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
@@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
#include <asm/hypervisor.h>
#include <asm/tlb.h>
#include <asm/cpuidle_haltpoll.h>
+#include <asm/ptrace.h>
+#include <asm/svm.h>
static int kvmapf = 1;
@@ -729,13 +731,34 @@ static void __init kvm_init_platform(void)
x86_platform.apic_post_init = kvm_apic_init;
}
+#if defined(CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT)
+static void kvm_sev_es_hcall_prepare(struct ghcb *ghcb, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ /* RAX and CPL are already in the GHCB */
+ ghcb_set_rbx(ghcb, regs->bx);
+ ghcb_set_rcx(ghcb, regs->cx);
+ ghcb_set_rdx(ghcb, regs->dx);
+ ghcb_set_rsi(ghcb, regs->si);
+}
+
+static bool kvm_sev_es_hcall_finish(struct ghcb *ghcb, struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+ /* No checking of the return state needed */
+ return true;
+}
+#endif
+
const __initconst struct hypervisor_x86 x86_hyper_kvm = {
- .name = "KVM",
- .detect = kvm_detect,
- .type = X86_HYPER_KVM,
- .init.guest_late_init = kvm_guest_init,
- .init.x2apic_available = kvm_para_available,
- .init.init_platform = kvm_init_platform,
+ .name = "KVM",
+ .detect = kvm_detect,
+ .type = X86_HYPER_KVM,
+ .init.guest_late_init = kvm_guest_init,
+ .init.x2apic_available = kvm_para_available,
+ .init.init_platform = kvm_init_platform,
+#if defined(CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT)
+ .runtime.sev_es_hcall_prepare = kvm_sev_es_hcall_prepare,
+ .runtime.sev_es_hcall_finish = kvm_sev_es_hcall_finish,
+#endif
};
static __init int activate_jump_labels(void)
--
2.17.1
On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> From: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
>
> Implement the callbacks to copy the processor state required by KVM to
> the GHCB.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tom Lendacky <[email protected]>
> [ [email protected]: - Split out of a larger patch
> - Adapt to different callback functions ]
> Co-developed-by: Joerg Roedel <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> index 6efe0410fb72..0e3fc798d719 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kvm.c
> @@ -34,6 +34,8 @@
> #include <asm/hypervisor.h>
> #include <asm/tlb.h>
> #include <asm/cpuidle_haltpoll.h>
> +#include <asm/ptrace.h>
> +#include <asm/svm.h>
>
> static int kvmapf = 1;
>
> @@ -729,13 +731,34 @@ static void __init kvm_init_platform(void)
> x86_platform.apic_post_init = kvm_apic_init;
> }
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT)
> +static void kvm_sev_es_hcall_prepare(struct ghcb *ghcb, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + /* RAX and CPL are already in the GHCB */
> + ghcb_set_rbx(ghcb, regs->bx);
> + ghcb_set_rcx(ghcb, regs->cx);
> + ghcb_set_rdx(ghcb, regs->dx);
> + ghcb_set_rsi(ghcb, regs->si);
Is it possible to check the hypercall from RAX and only copy the needed
regs or is there a requirement that they must all be copied
unconditionally?
> +}
> +
> +static bool kvm_sev_es_hcall_finish(struct ghcb *ghcb, struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> + /* No checking of the return state needed */
> + return true;
> +}
> +#endif
> +
> const __initconst struct hypervisor_x86 x86_hyper_kvm = {
> - .name = "KVM",
> - .detect = kvm_detect,
> - .type = X86_HYPER_KVM,
> - .init.guest_late_init = kvm_guest_init,
> - .init.x2apic_available = kvm_para_available,
> - .init.init_platform = kvm_init_platform,
> + .name = "KVM",
> + .detect = kvm_detect,
> + .type = X86_HYPER_KVM,
> + .init.guest_late_init = kvm_guest_init,
> + .init.x2apic_available = kvm_para_available,
> + .init.init_platform = kvm_init_platform,
> +#if defined(CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT)
> + .runtime.sev_es_hcall_prepare = kvm_sev_es_hcall_prepare,
> + .runtime.sev_es_hcall_finish = kvm_sev_es_hcall_finish,
> +#endif
> };
>
> static __init int activate_jump_labels(void)
> --
> 2.17.1
>
>
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 02:23:58PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Mar 2020, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > +#if defined(CONFIG_AMD_MEM_ENCRYPT)
> > +static void kvm_sev_es_hcall_prepare(struct ghcb *ghcb, struct pt_regs *regs)
> > +{
> > + /* RAX and CPL are already in the GHCB */
> > + ghcb_set_rbx(ghcb, regs->bx);
> > + ghcb_set_rcx(ghcb, regs->cx);
> > + ghcb_set_rdx(ghcb, regs->dx);
> > + ghcb_set_rsi(ghcb, regs->si);
>
> Is it possible to check the hypercall from RAX and only copy the needed
> regs or is there a requirement that they must all be copied
> unconditionally?
No, there is no such requirement. This could be optimized with hypercall
specific knowledge as it is in the KVM code anyway.
Regards,
Joerg