2020-04-26 13:15:58

by 赵军奎

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] drm/radeon: cleanup coding style a bit

Maybe no need to check ws before kmalloc, kmalloc will check
itself, kmalloc`s logic is if ptr is NULL, kmalloc will just
return

Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
index 2c27627b6659..f15b20da5315 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
@@ -1211,8 +1211,7 @@ static int atom_execute_table_locked(struct atom_context *ctx, int index, uint32
SDEBUG("<<\n");

free:
- if (ws)
- kfree(ectx.ws);
+ kfree(ectx.ws);
return ret;
}

--
2.26.2


2020-04-26 13:20:06

by Christian König

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: cleanup coding style a bit

Am 26.04.20 um 15:12 schrieb Bernard Zhao:
> Maybe no need to check ws before kmalloc, kmalloc will check
> itself, kmalloc`s logic is if ptr is NULL, kmalloc will just
> return
>
> Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <[email protected]>

Reviewed-by: Christian König <[email protected]>

I'm wondering why the automated scripts haven't found that one before.

> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
> index 2c27627b6659..f15b20da5315 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
> @@ -1211,8 +1211,7 @@ static int atom_execute_table_locked(struct atom_context *ctx, int index, uint32
> SDEBUG("<<\n");
>
> free:
> - if (ws)
> - kfree(ectx.ws);
> + kfree(ectx.ws);
> return ret;
> }
>

2020-04-26 17:55:46

by Joe Perches

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: cleanup coding style a bit

On Sun, 2020-04-26 at 15:18 +0200, Christian K?nig wrote:
> Am 26.04.20 um 15:12 schrieb Bernard Zhao:
> > Maybe no need to check ws before kmalloc, kmalloc will check
> > itself, kmalloc`s logic is if ptr is NULL, kmalloc will just
> > return
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <[email protected]>
>
> Reviewed-by: Christian K?nig <[email protected]>
>
> I'm wondering why the automated scripts haven't found that one before.

because this pattern is

if (foo)
kfree(bar);

and the pattern looked for is:

if (foo)
kfree(foo);

> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
[]
> > @@ -1211,8 +1211,7 @@ static int atom_execute_table_locked(struct atom_context *ctx, int index, uint32
> > SDEBUG("<<\n");
> >
> > free:
> > - if (ws)
> > - kfree(ectx.ws);
> > + kfree(ectx.ws);
> > return ret;
> > }

I'm wondering if this removal is correct as the function
is named _locked and it may be recursive or called under
some external lock.


2020-04-26 18:08:58

by Joe Perches

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: cleanup coding style a bit

btw: the debugging macros in atom.c are not good.

It could be something like the below as the output logging is
at best poorly formatted due to the many individual printks
without KERN_<LEVEL> that are emitted on separate lines.

#define ATOM_DEBUG

should probably be commented out.

The debugging macros and #include file should be better formatted.

The no_printk macro is useful to verify formats and arguments when
not debugging and removing the ATOM_DEBUG from atom-names.h does
not cause the unused char *arrays to be added to the object file
as the compiler elides unused arrays.

---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom-names.h | 266 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c | 23 ++--
2 files changed, 218 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom-names.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom-names.h
index 6f907a5..055775 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom-names.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom-names.h
@@ -27,74 +27,218 @@

#include "atom.h"

-#ifdef ATOM_DEBUG
-
#define ATOM_OP_NAMES_CNT 123
-static char *atom_op_names[ATOM_OP_NAMES_CNT] = {
-"RESERVED", "MOVE_REG", "MOVE_PS", "MOVE_WS", "MOVE_FB", "MOVE_PLL",
-"MOVE_MC", "AND_REG", "AND_PS", "AND_WS", "AND_FB", "AND_PLL", "AND_MC",
-"OR_REG", "OR_PS", "OR_WS", "OR_FB", "OR_PLL", "OR_MC", "SHIFT_LEFT_REG",
-"SHIFT_LEFT_PS", "SHIFT_LEFT_WS", "SHIFT_LEFT_FB", "SHIFT_LEFT_PLL",
-"SHIFT_LEFT_MC", "SHIFT_RIGHT_REG", "SHIFT_RIGHT_PS", "SHIFT_RIGHT_WS",
-"SHIFT_RIGHT_FB", "SHIFT_RIGHT_PLL", "SHIFT_RIGHT_MC", "MUL_REG",
-"MUL_PS", "MUL_WS", "MUL_FB", "MUL_PLL", "MUL_MC", "DIV_REG", "DIV_PS",
-"DIV_WS", "DIV_FB", "DIV_PLL", "DIV_MC", "ADD_REG", "ADD_PS", "ADD_WS",
-"ADD_FB", "ADD_PLL", "ADD_MC", "SUB_REG", "SUB_PS", "SUB_WS", "SUB_FB",
-"SUB_PLL", "SUB_MC", "SET_ATI_PORT", "SET_PCI_PORT", "SET_SYS_IO_PORT",
-"SET_REG_BLOCK", "SET_FB_BASE", "COMPARE_REG", "COMPARE_PS",
-"COMPARE_WS", "COMPARE_FB", "COMPARE_PLL", "COMPARE_MC", "SWITCH",
-"JUMP", "JUMP_EQUAL", "JUMP_BELOW", "JUMP_ABOVE", "JUMP_BELOW_OR_EQUAL",
-"JUMP_ABOVE_OR_EQUAL", "JUMP_NOT_EQUAL", "TEST_REG", "TEST_PS", "TEST_WS",
-"TEST_FB", "TEST_PLL", "TEST_MC", "DELAY_MILLISEC", "DELAY_MICROSEC",
-"CALL_TABLE", "REPEAT", "CLEAR_REG", "CLEAR_PS", "CLEAR_WS", "CLEAR_FB",
-"CLEAR_PLL", "CLEAR_MC", "NOP", "EOT", "MASK_REG", "MASK_PS", "MASK_WS",
-"MASK_FB", "MASK_PLL", "MASK_MC", "POST_CARD", "BEEP", "SAVE_REG",
-"RESTORE_REG", "SET_DATA_BLOCK", "XOR_REG", "XOR_PS", "XOR_WS", "XOR_FB",
-"XOR_PLL", "XOR_MC", "SHL_REG", "SHL_PS", "SHL_WS", "SHL_FB", "SHL_PLL",
-"SHL_MC", "SHR_REG", "SHR_PS", "SHR_WS", "SHR_FB", "SHR_PLL", "SHR_MC",
-"DEBUG", "CTB_DS",
+static const char * const atom_op_names[ATOM_OP_NAMES_CNT] = {
+ "RESERVED",
+ "MOVE_REG",
+ "MOVE_PS",
+ "MOVE_WS",
+ "MOVE_FB",
+ "MOVE_PLL",
+ "MOVE_MC",
+ "AND_REG",
+ "AND_PS",
+ "AND_WS",
+ "AND_FB",
+ "AND_PLL",
+ "AND_MC",
+ "OR_REG",
+ "OR_PS",
+ "OR_WS",
+ "OR_FB",
+ "OR_PLL",
+ "OR_MC",
+ "SHIFT_LEFT_REG",
+ "SHIFT_LEFT_PS",
+ "SHIFT_LEFT_WS",
+ "SHIFT_LEFT_FB",
+ "SHIFT_LEFT_PLL",
+ "SHIFT_LEFT_MC",
+ "SHIFT_RIGHT_REG",
+ "SHIFT_RIGHT_PS",
+ "SHIFT_RIGHT_WS",
+ "SHIFT_RIGHT_FB",
+ "SHIFT_RIGHT_PLL",
+ "SHIFT_RIGHT_MC",
+ "MUL_REG",
+ "MUL_PS",
+ "MUL_WS",
+ "MUL_FB",
+ "MUL_PLL",
+ "MUL_MC",
+ "DIV_REG",
+ "DIV_PS",
+ "DIV_WS",
+ "DIV_FB",
+ "DIV_PLL",
+ "DIV_MC",
+ "ADD_REG",
+ "ADD_PS",
+ "ADD_WS",
+ "ADD_FB",
+ "ADD_PLL",
+ "ADD_MC",
+ "SUB_REG",
+ "SUB_PS",
+ "SUB_WS",
+ "SUB_FB",
+ "SUB_PLL",
+ "SUB_MC",
+ "SET_ATI_PORT",
+ "SET_PCI_PORT",
+ "SET_SYS_IO_PORT",
+ "SET_REG_BLOCK",
+ "SET_FB_BASE",
+ "COMPARE_REG",
+ "COMPARE_PS",
+ "COMPARE_WS",
+ "COMPARE_FB",
+ "COMPARE_PLL",
+ "COMPARE_MC",
+ "SWITCH",
+ "JUMP",
+ "JUMP_EQUAL",
+ "JUMP_BELOW",
+ "JUMP_ABOVE",
+ "JUMP_BELOW_OR_EQUAL",
+ "JUMP_ABOVE_OR_EQUAL",
+ "JUMP_NOT_EQUAL",
+ "TEST_REG",
+ "TEST_PS",
+ "TEST_WS",
+ "TEST_FB",
+ "TEST_PLL",
+ "TEST_MC",
+ "DELAY_MILLISEC",
+ "DELAY_MICROSEC",
+ "CALL_TABLE",
+ "REPEAT",
+ "CLEAR_REG",
+ "CLEAR_PS",
+ "CLEAR_WS",
+ "CLEAR_FB",
+ "CLEAR_PLL",
+ "CLEAR_MC",
+ "NOP",
+ "EOT",
+ "MASK_REG",
+ "MASK_PS",
+ "MASK_WS",
+ "MASK_FB",
+ "MASK_PLL",
+ "MASK_MC",
+ "POST_CARD",
+ "BEEP",
+ "SAVE_REG",
+ "RESTORE_REG",
+ "SET_DATA_BLOCK",
+ "XOR_REG",
+ "XOR_PS",
+ "XOR_WS",
+ "XOR_FB",
+ "XOR_PLL",
+ "XOR_MC",
+ "SHL_REG",
+ "SHL_PS",
+ "SHL_WS",
+ "SHL_FB",
+ "SHL_PLL",
+ "SHL_MC",
+ "SHR_REG",
+ "SHR_PS",
+ "SHR_WS",
+ "SHR_FB",
+ "SHR_PLL",
+ "SHR_MC",
+ "DEBUG",
+ "CTB_DS",
};

#define ATOM_TABLE_NAMES_CNT 74
-static char *atom_table_names[ATOM_TABLE_NAMES_CNT] = {
-"ASIC_Init", "GetDisplaySurfaceSize", "ASIC_RegistersInit",
-"VRAM_BlockVenderDetection", "SetClocksRatio", "MemoryControllerInit",
-"GPIO_PinInit", "MemoryParamAdjust", "DVOEncoderControl",
-"GPIOPinControl", "SetEngineClock", "SetMemoryClock", "SetPixelClock",
-"DynamicClockGating", "ResetMemoryDLL", "ResetMemoryDevice",
-"MemoryPLLInit", "EnableMemorySelfRefresh", "AdjustMemoryController",
-"EnableASIC_StaticPwrMgt", "ASIC_StaticPwrMgtStatusChange",
-"DAC_LoadDetection", "TMDS2EncoderControl", "LCD1OutputControl",
-"DAC1EncoderControl", "DAC2EncoderControl", "DVOOutputControl",
-"CV1OutputControl", "SetCRTC_DPM_State", "TVEncoderControl",
-"TMDS1EncoderControl", "LVDSEncoderControl", "TV1OutputControl",
-"EnableScaler", "BlankCRTC", "EnableCRTC", "GetPixelClock",
-"EnableVGA_Render", "EnableVGA_Access", "SetCRTC_Timing",
-"SetCRTC_OverScan", "SetCRTC_Replication", "SelectCRTC_Source",
-"EnableGraphSurfaces", "UpdateCRTC_DoubleBufferRegisters",
-"LUT_AutoFill", "EnableHW_IconCursor", "GetMemoryClock",
-"GetEngineClock", "SetCRTC_UsingDTDTiming", "TVBootUpStdPinDetection",
-"DFP2OutputControl", "VRAM_BlockDetectionByStrap", "MemoryCleanUp",
-"ReadEDIDFromHWAssistedI2C", "WriteOneByteToHWAssistedI2C",
-"ReadHWAssistedI2CStatus", "SpeedFanControl", "PowerConnectorDetection",
-"MC_Synchronization", "ComputeMemoryEnginePLL", "MemoryRefreshConversion",
-"VRAM_GetCurrentInfoBlock", "DynamicMemorySettings", "MemoryTraining",
-"EnableLVDS_SS", "DFP1OutputControl", "SetVoltage", "CRT1OutputControl",
-"CRT2OutputControl", "SetupHWAssistedI2CStatus", "ClockSource",
-"MemoryDeviceInit", "EnableYUV",
+static const char * const atom_table_names[ATOM_TABLE_NAMES_CNT] = {
+ "ASIC_Init",
+ "GetDisplaySurfaceSize",
+ "ASIC_RegistersInit",
+ "VRAM_BlockVenderDetection",
+ "SetClocksRatio",
+ "MemoryControllerInit",
+ "GPIO_PinInit",
+ "MemoryParamAdjust",
+ "DVOEncoderControl",
+ "GPIOPinControl",
+ "SetEngineClock",
+ "SetMemoryClock",
+ "SetPixelClock",
+ "DynamicClockGating",
+ "ResetMemoryDLL",
+ "ResetMemoryDevice",
+ "MemoryPLLInit",
+ "EnableMemorySelfRefresh",
+ "AdjustMemoryController",
+ "EnableASIC_StaticPwrMgt",
+ "ASIC_StaticPwrMgtStatusChange",
+ "DAC_LoadDetection",
+ "TMDS2EncoderControl",
+ "LCD1OutputControl",
+ "DAC1EncoderControl",
+ "DAC2EncoderControl",
+ "DVOOutputControl",
+ "CV1OutputControl",
+ "SetCRTC_DPM_State",
+ "TVEncoderControl",
+ "TMDS1EncoderControl",
+ "LVDSEncoderControl",
+ "TV1OutputControl",
+ "EnableScaler",
+ "BlankCRTC",
+ "EnableCRTC",
+ "GetPixelClock",
+ "EnableVGA_Render",
+ "EnableVGA_Access",
+ "SetCRTC_Timing",
+ "SetCRTC_OverScan",
+ "SetCRTC_Replication",
+ "SelectCRTC_Source",
+ "EnableGraphSurfaces",
+ "UpdateCRTC_DoubleBufferRegisters",
+ "LUT_AutoFill",
+ "EnableHW_IconCursor",
+ "GetMemoryClock",
+ "GetEngineClock",
+ "SetCRTC_UsingDTDTiming",
+ "TVBootUpStdPinDetection",
+ "DFP2OutputControl",
+ "VRAM_BlockDetectionByStrap",
+ "MemoryCleanUp",
+ "ReadEDIDFromHWAssistedI2C",
+ "WriteOneByteToHWAssistedI2C",
+ "ReadHWAssistedI2CStatus",
+ "SpeedFanControl",
+ "PowerConnectorDetection",
+ "MC_Synchronization",
+ "ComputeMemoryEnginePLL",
+ "MemoryRefreshConversion",
+ "VRAM_GetCurrentInfoBlock",
+ "DynamicMemorySettings",
+ "MemoryTraining",
+ "EnableLVDS_SS",
+ "DFP1OutputControl",
+ "SetVoltage",
+ "CRT1OutputControl",
+ "CRT2OutputControl",
+ "SetupHWAssistedI2CStatus",
+ "ClockSource",
+ "MemoryDeviceInit",
+ "EnableYUV",
};

#define ATOM_IO_NAMES_CNT 5
-static char *atom_io_names[ATOM_IO_NAMES_CNT] = {
-"MM", "PLL", "MC", "PCIE", "PCIE PORT",
+static const char * const atom_io_names[ATOM_IO_NAMES_CNT] = {
+ "MM",
+ "PLL",
+ "MC",
+ "PCIE",
+ "PCIE PORT",
};

-#else
-
-#define ATOM_OP_NAMES_CNT 0
-#define ATOM_TABLE_NAMES_CNT 0
-#define ATOM_IO_NAMES_CNT 0
-
-#endif
-
#endif
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
index 2c2762..892eeb 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
@@ -91,17 +91,20 @@ static int atom_def_dst[8] = { 0, 0, 1, 2, 0, 1, 2, 3 };

static int debug_depth = 0;
#ifdef ATOM_DEBUG
-static void debug_print_spaces(int n)
-{
- while (n--)
- printk(" ");
-}
-
-#define DEBUG(...) do if (atom_debug) { printk(KERN_DEBUG __VA_ARGS__); } while (0)
-#define SDEBUG(...) do if (atom_debug) { printk(KERN_DEBUG); debug_print_spaces(debug_depth); printk(__VA_ARGS__); } while (0)
+#define DEBUG(fmt, ...) \
+do { \
+ if (atom_debug) \
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+} while (0)
+#define SDEBUG(fmt, ...) \
+do { \
+ if (atom_debug) \
+ printk(KERN_DEBUG "%*s" fmt, \
+ debug_depth * 3, "", ##__VA_ARGS__); \
+} while (0)
#else
-#define DEBUG(...) do { } while (0)
-#define SDEBUG(...) do { } while (0)
+#define DEBUG(fmt, ...) no_printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+#define SDEBUG(fmt, ...) no_printk(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
#endif

static uint32_t atom_iio_execute(struct atom_context *ctx, int base,




2020-04-30 11:04:46

by 赵军奎

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re:Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: cleanup coding style a bit



发件人:Joe Perches <[email protected]>
发送日期:2020-04-27 01:53:06
收件人:"Christian König" <[email protected]>,Bernard Zhao <[email protected]>,Alex Deucher <[email protected]>,"David (ChunMing) Zhou" <[email protected]>,David Airlie <[email protected]>,Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>,[email protected],[email protected],[email protected]
抄送人:[email protected]
主题:Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: cleanup coding style a bit>On Sun, 2020-04-26 at 15:18 +0200, Christian König wrote:
>> Am 26.04.20 um 15:12 schrieb Bernard Zhao:
>> > Maybe no need to check ws before kmalloc, kmalloc will check
>> > itself, kmalloc`s logic is if ptr is NULL, kmalloc will just
>> > return
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <[email protected]>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Christian König <[email protected]>
>>
>> I'm wondering why the automated scripts haven't found that one before.
>
>because this pattern is
>
> if (foo)
> kfree(bar);
>
>and the pattern looked for is:
>
> if (foo)
> kfree(foo);
>
>> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
>[]
>> > @@ -1211,8 +1211,7 @@ static int atom_execute_table_locked(struct atom_context *ctx, int index, uint32
>> > SDEBUG("<<\n");
>> >
>> > free:
>> > - if (ws)
>> > - kfree(ectx.ws);
>> > + kfree(ectx.ws);
>> > return ret;
>> > }
>
>I'm wondering if this removal is correct as the function
>is named _locked and it may be recursive or called under
>some external lock.
>
Hi
I am a little confused about this. I understand that the caller guarantees the lock protection
that we will not release the wrong pointer. And the NULL check is the same with the first check in kfree?
Maybe we do not need check twich.

Regards,
Bernard



2020-04-30 13:35:21

by Christian König

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: cleanup coding style a bit

Am 30.04.20 um 13:00 schrieb Bernard:
>
> 发件人:Joe Perches <[email protected]>
> 发送日期:2020-04-27 01:53:06
> 收件人:"Christian König" <[email protected]>,Bernard Zhao <[email protected]>,Alex Deucher <[email protected]>,"David (ChunMing) Zhou" <[email protected]>,David Airlie <[email protected]>,Daniel Vetter <[email protected]>,[email protected],[email protected],[email protected]
> 抄送人:[email protected]
> 主题:Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: cleanup coding style a bit>On Sun, 2020-04-26 at 15:18 +0200, Christian König wrote:
>>> Am 26.04.20 um 15:12 schrieb Bernard Zhao:
>>>> Maybe no need to check ws before kmalloc, kmalloc will check
>>>> itself, kmalloc`s logic is if ptr is NULL, kmalloc will just
>>>> return
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <[email protected]>
>>> Reviewed-by: Christian König <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> I'm wondering why the automated scripts haven't found that one before.
>> because this pattern is
>>
>> if (foo)
>> kfree(bar);
>>
>> and the pattern looked for is:
>>
>> if (foo)
>> kfree(foo);
>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
>> []
>>>> @@ -1211,8 +1211,7 @@ static int atom_execute_table_locked(struct atom_context *ctx, int index, uint32
>>>> SDEBUG("<<\n");
>>>>
>>>> free:
>>>> - if (ws)
>>>> - kfree(ectx.ws);
>>>> + kfree(ectx.ws);
>>>> return ret;
>>>> }
>> I'm wondering if this removal is correct as the function
>> is named _locked and it may be recursive or called under
>> some external lock.
>>
> Hi
> I am a little confused about this. I understand that the caller guarantees the lock protection
> that we will not release the wrong pointer. And the NULL check is the same with the first check in kfree?
> Maybe we do not need check twich.

I don't understand the comment either. When you look at the function you
see that code is freeing up the temporary allocated buffer which is to
large for the stack.

In other words we kcalloc() this buffer a few lines above and free it
here again. So I think the patch is perfectly valid.

What we could do is to update the coci pattern to catch this as well,
but this case is so rare that it is probably not worth it.

Regards,
Christian.

>
> Regards,
> Bernard
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> amd-gfx mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx

2020-04-30 14:55:54

by Alex Deucher

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/radeon: cleanup coding style a bit

Applied. Thanks!

Alex

On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 9:18 AM Christian König
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Am 26.04.20 um 15:12 schrieb Bernard Zhao:
> > Maybe no need to check ws before kmalloc, kmalloc will check
> > itself, kmalloc`s logic is if ptr is NULL, kmalloc will just
> > return
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Bernard Zhao <[email protected]>
>
> Reviewed-by: Christian König <[email protected]>
>
> I'm wondering why the automated scripts haven't found that one before.
>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c | 3 +--
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
> > index 2c27627b6659..f15b20da5315 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/atom.c
> > @@ -1211,8 +1211,7 @@ static int atom_execute_table_locked(struct atom_context *ctx, int index, uint32
> > SDEBUG("<<\n");
> >
> > free:
> > - if (ws)
> > - kfree(ectx.ws);
> > + kfree(ectx.ws);
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> dri-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel