A recent cleanup introduced a bug on any omap1 machine that has
no wakeup IRQ, i.e. omap15xx:
arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c:656:11: error: variable 'irq' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is false [-Werror,-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
else if (cpu_is_omap16xx())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/soc/ti/omap1-soc.h:115:30: note: expanded from macro 'cpu_is_omap16xx'
# define cpu_is_omap16xx() is_omap16xx()
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c:658:18: note: uninitialized use occurs here
if (request_irq(irq, omap_wakeup_interrupt, 0, "peripheral wakeup",
^~~
arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c:656:7: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always true
else if (cpu_is_omap16xx())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c:611:9: note: initialize the variable 'irq' to silence this warning
int irq;
^
Move this code into a separate function to deal with it cleanly.
Fixes: b75ca5217743 ("ARM: OMAP: replace setup_irq() by request_irq()")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c
index 0f8064bd40ae..266aa08aa8ed 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap1/pm.c
@@ -605,10 +605,25 @@ static const struct platform_suspend_ops omap_pm_ops = {
.valid = suspend_valid_only_mem,
};
+static void omap_wakeup_init(void)
+{
+ int irq;
+
+ if (cpu_is_omap7xx())
+ irq = INT_7XX_WAKE_UP_REQ;
+ else if (cpu_is_omap16xx())
+ irq = INT_1610_WAKE_UP_REQ;
+ else
+ return;
+
+ if (request_irq(irq, omap_wakeup_interrupt, 0, "peripheral wakeup",
+ NULL))
+ pr_err("Failed to request irq %d (peripheral wakeup)\n", irq);
+}
+
static int __init omap_pm_init(void)
{
int error = 0;
- int irq;
if (!cpu_class_is_omap1())
return -ENODEV;
@@ -651,13 +666,7 @@ static int __init omap_pm_init(void)
arm_pm_idle = omap1_pm_idle;
- if (cpu_is_omap7xx())
- irq = INT_7XX_WAKE_UP_REQ;
- else if (cpu_is_omap16xx())
- irq = INT_1610_WAKE_UP_REQ;
- if (request_irq(irq, omap_wakeup_interrupt, 0, "peripheral wakeup",
- NULL))
- pr_err("Failed to request irq %d (peripheral wakeup)\n", irq);
+ omap_wakeup_init();
/* Program new power ramp-up time
* (0 for most boards since we don't lower voltage when in deep sleep)
--
2.26.0
Hi,
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 04:13:48PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> A recent cleanup introduced a bug on any omap1 machine that has
> no wakeup IRQ, i.e. omap15xx:
> Move this code into a separate function to deal with it cleanly.
>
> Fixes: b75ca5217743 ("ARM: OMAP: replace setup_irq() by request_irq()")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
Sorry for the mistake and thanks for the fix,
Acked-by: afzal mohammed <[email protected]>
Regards
afzal
* afzal mohammed <[email protected]> [200505 14:31]:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 04:13:48PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > A recent cleanup introduced a bug on any omap1 machine that has
> > no wakeup IRQ, i.e. omap15xx:
>
> > Move this code into a separate function to deal with it cleanly.
> >
> > Fixes: b75ca5217743 ("ARM: OMAP: replace setup_irq() by request_irq()")
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
>
> Sorry for the mistake and thanks for the fix,
>
> Acked-by: afzal mohammed <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>
* afzal mohammed <[email protected]> [200505 14:31]:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 04:13:48PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> > A recent cleanup introduced a bug on any omap1 machine that has
> > no wakeup IRQ, i.e. omap15xx:
>
> > Move this code into a separate function to deal with it cleanly.
> >
> > Fixes: b75ca5217743 ("ARM: OMAP: replace setup_irq() by request_irq()")
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <[email protected]>
>
> Sorry for the mistake and thanks for the fix,
>
> Acked-by: afzal mohammed <[email protected]>
Hmm so is this one still pending?
Best that Arnd applies it directly:
Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <[email protected]>