2020-04-27 07:50:56

by Marek Szyprowski

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] mfd: wm8994: Fix unbalanced calls to regulator_bulk_disable()

When runtime PM is enabled, regulators are being controlled by the
driver's suspend and resume callbacks. They are also unconditionally
enabled at driver's probe(), and disabled in remove() functions. Add
more calls to runtime PM framework to ensure that the device's runtime
PM state matches the regulators state:
1. at the end of probe() function: set runtime PM state to active, so
there will be no spurious call to resume();
2. in remove(), ensure that resume() is called before disabling runtime PM
management and unconditionally disabling the regulators.

Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Charles Keepax <[email protected]>
---
drivers/mfd/wm8994-core.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/wm8994-core.c b/drivers/mfd/wm8994-core.c
index 737dede4a95c..69d973ec42bf 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/wm8994-core.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/wm8994-core.c
@@ -584,6 +584,7 @@ static int wm8994_device_init(struct wm8994 *wm8994, int irq)
goto err_irq;
}

+ pm_runtime_set_active(wm8994->dev);
pm_runtime_enable(wm8994->dev);
pm_runtime_idle(wm8994->dev);

@@ -603,7 +604,9 @@ static int wm8994_device_init(struct wm8994 *wm8994, int irq)

static void wm8994_device_exit(struct wm8994 *wm8994)
{
+ pm_runtime_get_sync(wm8994->dev);
pm_runtime_disable(wm8994->dev);
+ pm_runtime_put_noidle(wm8994->dev);
wm8994_irq_exit(wm8994);
regulator_bulk_disable(wm8994->num_supplies, wm8994->supplies);
regulator_bulk_free(wm8994->num_supplies, wm8994->supplies);
--
2.17.1


2020-04-28 10:40:11

by Lee Jones

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mfd: wm8994: Fix unbalanced calls to regulator_bulk_disable()

On Mon, 27 Apr 2020, Marek Szyprowski wrote:

> When runtime PM is enabled, regulators are being controlled by the
> driver's suspend and resume callbacks. They are also unconditionally
> enabled at driver's probe(), and disabled in remove() functions. Add
> more calls to runtime PM framework to ensure that the device's runtime
> PM state matches the regulators state:
> 1. at the end of probe() function: set runtime PM state to active, so
> there will be no spurious call to resume();
> 2. in remove(), ensure that resume() is called before disabling runtime PM
> management and unconditionally disabling the regulators.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Charles Keepax <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/wm8994-core.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

For my own reference (apply this as-is to your sign-off block):

Acked-for-MFD-by: Lee Jones <[email protected]>

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

2020-05-22 08:09:28

by Lee Jones

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] mfd: wm8994: Fix unbalanced calls to regulator_bulk_disable()

On Mon, 27 Apr 2020, Marek Szyprowski wrote:

> When runtime PM is enabled, regulators are being controlled by the
> driver's suspend and resume callbacks. They are also unconditionally
> enabled at driver's probe(), and disabled in remove() functions. Add
> more calls to runtime PM framework to ensure that the device's runtime
> PM state matches the regulators state:
> 1. at the end of probe() function: set runtime PM state to active, so
> there will be no spurious call to resume();
> 2. in remove(), ensure that resume() is called before disabling runtime PM
> management and unconditionally disabling the regulators.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Szyprowski <[email protected]>
> Acked-by: Charles Keepax <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/wm8994-core.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

Applied, thanks.

--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Linaro Services Technical Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog