2020-05-22 14:49:55

by Jaegeuk Kim

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: avoid inifinite loop to wait for flushing node pages at cp_error

Shutdown test is somtime hung, since dirty node pages weren't flushed out.
Let's drop dirty pages at umount after shutdown.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
---
fs/f2fs/node.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index e632de10aedab..8c63964a82fd0 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1520,8 +1520,15 @@ static int __write_node_page(struct page *page, bool atomic, bool *submitted,

trace_f2fs_writepage(page, NODE);

- if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
+ if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
+ if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
+ dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES);
+ up_read(&sbi->node_write);
+ unlock_page(page);
+ return 0;
+ }
goto redirty_out;
+ }

if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING)))
goto redirty_out;
--
2.27.0.rc0.183.gde8f92d652-goog


2020-05-22 23:34:40

by Jaegeuk Kim

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: avoid inifinite loop to wait for flushing node pages at cp_error

Shutdown test is somtimes hung, since it keeps trying to flush dirty node pages
in an inifinite loop. Let's drop dirty pages at umount in that case.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
---
v2:
- fix typos

fs/f2fs/node.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index e632de10aedab..8c63964a82fd0 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1520,8 +1520,15 @@ static int __write_node_page(struct page *page, bool atomic, bool *submitted,

trace_f2fs_writepage(page, NODE);

- if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
+ if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
+ if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
+ dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES);
+ up_read(&sbi->node_write);
+ unlock_page(page);
+ return 0;
+ }
goto redirty_out;
+ }

if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING)))
goto redirty_out;
--
2.27.0.rc0.183.gde8f92d652-goog

2020-05-25 03:15:13

by Chao Yu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: avoid inifinite loop to wait for flushing node pages at cp_error

On 2020/5/22 22:47, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Shutdown test is somtime hung, since dirty node pages weren't flushed out.
> Let's drop dirty pages at umount after shutdown.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/node.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index e632de10aedab..8c63964a82fd0 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -1520,8 +1520,15 @@ static int __write_node_page(struct page *page, bool atomic, bool *submitted,
>
> trace_f2fs_writepage(page, NODE);
>
> - if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
> + if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
> + if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
> + dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES);
> + up_read(&sbi->node_write);

We don't need to release node_write lock.

> + unlock_page(page);
> + return 0;
> + }
> goto redirty_out;
> + }
>
> if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING)))
> goto redirty_out;
>

2020-05-25 04:14:40

by Jaegeuk Kim

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] f2fs: avoid inifinite loop to wait for flushing node pages at cp_error

Shutdown test is somtimes hung, since it keeps trying to flush dirty node pages
in an inifinite loop. Let's drop dirty pages at umount in that case.

Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
---
v3:
- fix wrong unlock

v2:
- fix typos

fs/f2fs/node.c | 9 ++++++++-
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
index e632de10aedab..e0bb0f7e0506e 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
@@ -1520,8 +1520,15 @@ static int __write_node_page(struct page *page, bool atomic, bool *submitted,

trace_f2fs_writepage(page, NODE);

- if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
+ if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
+ if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
+ ClearPageUptodate(page);
+ dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES);
+ unlock_page(page);
+ return 0;
+ }
goto redirty_out;
+ }

if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING)))
goto redirty_out;
--
2.27.0.rc0.183.gde8f92d652-goog

2020-05-25 08:03:32

by Chao Yu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: avoid inifinite loop to wait for flushing node pages at cp_error

On 2020/5/25 11:56, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> Shutdown test is somtimes hung, since it keeps trying to flush dirty node pages

IMO, for umount case, we should drop dirty reference and dirty pages on meta/data
pages like we change for node pages to avoid potential dead loop...

Thanks,

> in an inifinite loop. Let's drop dirty pages at umount in that case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
> ---
> v3:
> - fix wrong unlock
>
> v2:
> - fix typos
>
> fs/f2fs/node.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> index e632de10aedab..e0bb0f7e0506e 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> @@ -1520,8 +1520,15 @@ static int __write_node_page(struct page *page, bool atomic, bool *submitted,
>
> trace_f2fs_writepage(page, NODE);
>
> - if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
> + if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
> + if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
> + ClearPageUptodate(page);
> + dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES);
> + unlock_page(page);
> + return 0;
> + }
> goto redirty_out;
> + }
>
> if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING)))
> goto redirty_out;
>

2020-05-25 15:10:46

by Jaegeuk Kim

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: avoid inifinite loop to wait for flushing node pages at cp_error

On 05/25, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2020/5/25 11:56, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Shutdown test is somtimes hung, since it keeps trying to flush dirty node pages
>
> IMO, for umount case, we should drop dirty reference and dirty pages on meta/data
> pages like we change for node pages to avoid potential dead loop...

I believe we're doing for them. :P

>
> Thanks,
>
> > in an inifinite loop. Let's drop dirty pages at umount in that case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > v3:
> > - fix wrong unlock
> >
> > v2:
> > - fix typos
> >
> > fs/f2fs/node.c | 9 ++++++++-
> > 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > index e632de10aedab..e0bb0f7e0506e 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> > @@ -1520,8 +1520,15 @@ static int __write_node_page(struct page *page, bool atomic, bool *submitted,
> >
> > trace_f2fs_writepage(page, NODE);
> >
> > - if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
> > + if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
> > + if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
> > + ClearPageUptodate(page);
> > + dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES);
> > + unlock_page(page);
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > goto redirty_out;
> > + }
> >
> > if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING)))
> > goto redirty_out;
> >

2020-05-26 01:14:58

by Chao Yu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: avoid inifinite loop to wait for flushing node pages at cp_error

On 2020/5/25 23:06, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 05/25, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2020/5/25 11:56, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> Shutdown test is somtimes hung, since it keeps trying to flush dirty node pages
>>
>> IMO, for umount case, we should drop dirty reference and dirty pages on meta/data
>> pages like we change for node pages to avoid potential dead loop...
>
> I believe we're doing for them. :P

Actually, I mean do we need to drop dirty meta/data pages explicitly as below:

diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
index 3dc3ac6fe143..4c08fd0a680a 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
@@ -299,8 +299,15 @@ static int __f2fs_write_meta_page(struct page *page,

trace_f2fs_writepage(page, META);

- if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
+ if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
+ if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
+ ClearPageUptodate(page);
+ dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_META);
+ unlock_page(page);
+ return 0;
+ }
goto redirty_out;
+ }
if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING)))
goto redirty_out;
if (wbc->for_reclaim && page->index < GET_SUM_BLOCK(sbi, 0))
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
index 48a622b95b76..94b342802513 100644
--- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
@@ -2682,6 +2682,12 @@ int f2fs_write_single_data_page(struct page *page, int *submitted,

/* we should bypass data pages to proceed the kworkder jobs */
if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
+ if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
+ ClearPageUptodate(page);
+ inode_dec_dirty_pages(inode);
+ unlock_page(page);
+ return 0;
+ }
mapping_set_error(page->mapping, -EIO);
/*
* don't drop any dirty dentry pages for keeping lastest

>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>> in an inifinite loop. Let's drop dirty pages at umount in that case.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
>>> ---
>>> v3:
>>> - fix wrong unlock
>>>
>>> v2:
>>> - fix typos
>>>
>>> fs/f2fs/node.c | 9 ++++++++-
>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
>>> index e632de10aedab..e0bb0f7e0506e 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
>>> @@ -1520,8 +1520,15 @@ static int __write_node_page(struct page *page, bool atomic, bool *submitted,
>>>
>>> trace_f2fs_writepage(page, NODE);
>>>
>>> - if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
>>> + if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
>>> + if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
>>> + ClearPageUptodate(page);
>>> + dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES);
>>> + unlock_page(page);
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> goto redirty_out;
>>> + }
>>>
>>> if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING)))
>>> goto redirty_out;
>>>
> .
>

2020-05-26 01:37:34

by Chao Yu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: avoid inifinite loop to wait for flushing node pages at cp_error

On 2020/5/26 9:11, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2020/5/25 23:06, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>> On 05/25, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> On 2020/5/25 11:56, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>> Shutdown test is somtimes hung, since it keeps trying to flush dirty node pages
>>>
>>> IMO, for umount case, we should drop dirty reference and dirty pages on meta/data
>>> pages like we change for node pages to avoid potential dead loop...
>>
>> I believe we're doing for them. :P
>
> Actually, I mean do we need to drop dirty meta/data pages explicitly as below:
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> index 3dc3ac6fe143..4c08fd0a680a 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> @@ -299,8 +299,15 @@ static int __f2fs_write_meta_page(struct page *page,
>
> trace_f2fs_writepage(page, META);
>
> - if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
> + if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
> + if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
> + ClearPageUptodate(page);
> + dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_META);
> + unlock_page(page);
> + return 0;
> + }
> goto redirty_out;
> + }
> if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING)))
> goto redirty_out;
> if (wbc->for_reclaim && page->index < GET_SUM_BLOCK(sbi, 0))
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> index 48a622b95b76..94b342802513 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> @@ -2682,6 +2682,12 @@ int f2fs_write_single_data_page(struct page *page, int *submitted,
>
> /* we should bypass data pages to proceed the kworkder jobs */
> if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
> + if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
> + ClearPageUptodate(page);
> + inode_dec_dirty_pages(inode);
> + unlock_page(page);
> + return 0;
> + }

Oh, I notice previously, we will drop non-directory inode's dirty pages directly,
however, during umount, we'd better drop directory inode's dirty pages as well, right?

> mapping_set_error(page->mapping, -EIO);
> /*
> * don't drop any dirty dentry pages for keeping lastest
>
>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>>> in an inifinite loop. Let's drop dirty pages at umount in that case.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
>>>> ---
>>>> v3:
>>>> - fix wrong unlock
>>>>
>>>> v2:
>>>> - fix typos
>>>>
>>>> fs/f2fs/node.c | 9 ++++++++-
>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
>>>> index e632de10aedab..e0bb0f7e0506e 100644
>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
>>>> @@ -1520,8 +1520,15 @@ static int __write_node_page(struct page *page, bool atomic, bool *submitted,
>>>>
>>>> trace_f2fs_writepage(page, NODE);
>>>>
>>>> - if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
>>>> + if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
>>>> + if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
>>>> + ClearPageUptodate(page);
>>>> + dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES);
>>>> + unlock_page(page);
>>>> + return 0;
>>>> + }
>>>> goto redirty_out;
>>>> + }
>>>>
>>>> if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING)))
>>>> goto redirty_out;
>>>>
>> .
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> .
>

2020-05-26 01:59:15

by Jaegeuk Kim

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: avoid inifinite loop to wait for flushing node pages at cp_error

On 05/26, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2020/5/26 9:11, Chao Yu wrote:
> > On 2020/5/25 23:06, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >> On 05/25, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>> On 2020/5/25 11:56, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>>> Shutdown test is somtimes hung, since it keeps trying to flush dirty node pages
> >>>
> >>> IMO, for umount case, we should drop dirty reference and dirty pages on meta/data
> >>> pages like we change for node pages to avoid potential dead loop...
> >>
> >> I believe we're doing for them. :P
> >
> > Actually, I mean do we need to drop dirty meta/data pages explicitly as below:
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > index 3dc3ac6fe143..4c08fd0a680a 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> > @@ -299,8 +299,15 @@ static int __f2fs_write_meta_page(struct page *page,
> >
> > trace_f2fs_writepage(page, META);
> >
> > - if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
> > + if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
> > + if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
> > + ClearPageUptodate(page);
> > + dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_META);
> > + unlock_page(page);
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > goto redirty_out;
> > + }
> > if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING)))
> > goto redirty_out;
> > if (wbc->for_reclaim && page->index < GET_SUM_BLOCK(sbi, 0))
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > index 48a622b95b76..94b342802513 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> > @@ -2682,6 +2682,12 @@ int f2fs_write_single_data_page(struct page *page, int *submitted,
> >
> > /* we should bypass data pages to proceed the kworkder jobs */
> > if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
> > + if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
> > + ClearPageUptodate(page);
> > + inode_dec_dirty_pages(inode);
> > + unlock_page(page);
> > + return 0;
> > + }
>
> Oh, I notice previously, we will drop non-directory inode's dirty pages directly,
> however, during umount, we'd better drop directory inode's dirty pages as well, right?

Hmm, I remember I dropped them before. Need to double check.

>
> > mapping_set_error(page->mapping, -EIO);
> > /*
> > * don't drop any dirty dentry pages for keeping lastest
> >
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>>> in an inifinite loop. Let's drop dirty pages at umount in that case.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> v3:
> >>>> - fix wrong unlock
> >>>>
> >>>> v2:
> >>>> - fix typos
> >>>>
> >>>> fs/f2fs/node.c | 9 ++++++++-
> >>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >>>> index e632de10aedab..e0bb0f7e0506e 100644
> >>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >>>> @@ -1520,8 +1520,15 @@ static int __write_node_page(struct page *page, bool atomic, bool *submitted,
> >>>>
> >>>> trace_f2fs_writepage(page, NODE);
> >>>>
> >>>> - if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
> >>>> + if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
> >>>> + if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
> >>>> + ClearPageUptodate(page);
> >>>> + dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES);
> >>>> + unlock_page(page);
> >>>> + return 0;
> >>>> + }
> >>>> goto redirty_out;
> >>>> + }
> >>>>
> >>>> if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING)))
> >>>> goto redirty_out;
> >>>>
> >> .
> >>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> > .
> >

2020-05-27 05:09:21

by Chao Yu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: avoid inifinite loop to wait for flushing node pages at cp_error

On 2020/5/26 9:56, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 05/26, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2020/5/26 9:11, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> On 2020/5/25 23:06, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>> On 05/25, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>> On 2020/5/25 11:56, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>>> Shutdown test is somtimes hung, since it keeps trying to flush dirty node pages

71.07% 0.01% kworker/u256:1+ [kernel.kallsyms] [k] wb_writeback
|
--71.06%--wb_writeback
|
|--68.96%--__writeback_inodes_wb
| |
| --68.95%--writeback_sb_inodes
| |
| |--65.08%--__writeback_single_inode
| | |
| | --64.35%--do_writepages
| | |
| | |--59.83%--f2fs_write_node_pages
| | | |
| | | --59.74%--f2fs_sync_node_pages
| | | |
| | | |--27.91%--pagevec_lookup_range_tag
| | | | |
| | | | --27.90%--find_get_pages_range_tag

Before umount, kworker will always hold one core, that looks not reasonable,
to avoid that, could we just allow node write, since it's out-place-update,
and cp is not allowed, we don't need to worry about its effect on data on
previous checkpoint, and it can decrease memory footprint cost by node pages.

Thanks,

>>>>>
>>>>> IMO, for umount case, we should drop dirty reference and dirty pages on meta/data
>>>>> pages like we change for node pages to avoid potential dead loop...
>>>>
>>>> I believe we're doing for them. :P
>>>
>>> Actually, I mean do we need to drop dirty meta/data pages explicitly as below:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>>> index 3dc3ac6fe143..4c08fd0a680a 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>>> @@ -299,8 +299,15 @@ static int __f2fs_write_meta_page(struct page *page,
>>>
>>> trace_f2fs_writepage(page, META);
>>>
>>> - if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
>>> + if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
>>> + if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
>>> + ClearPageUptodate(page);
>>> + dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_META);
>>> + unlock_page(page);
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>> goto redirty_out;
>>> + }
>>> if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING)))
>>> goto redirty_out;
>>> if (wbc->for_reclaim && page->index < GET_SUM_BLOCK(sbi, 0))
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
>>> index 48a622b95b76..94b342802513 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
>>> @@ -2682,6 +2682,12 @@ int f2fs_write_single_data_page(struct page *page, int *submitted,
>>>
>>> /* we should bypass data pages to proceed the kworkder jobs */
>>> if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
>>> + if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
>>> + ClearPageUptodate(page);
>>> + inode_dec_dirty_pages(inode);
>>> + unlock_page(page);
>>> + return 0;
>>> + }
>>
>> Oh, I notice previously, we will drop non-directory inode's dirty pages directly,
>> however, during umount, we'd better drop directory inode's dirty pages as well, right?
>
> Hmm, I remember I dropped them before. Need to double check.
>
>>
>>> mapping_set_error(page->mapping, -EIO);
>>> /*
>>> * don't drop any dirty dentry pages for keeping lastest
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>> in an inifinite loop. Let's drop dirty pages at umount in that case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> v3:
>>>>>> - fix wrong unlock
>>>>>>
>>>>>> v2:
>>>>>> - fix typos
>>>>>>
>>>>>> fs/f2fs/node.c | 9 ++++++++-
>>>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
>>>>>> index e632de10aedab..e0bb0f7e0506e 100644
>>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
>>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
>>>>>> @@ -1520,8 +1520,15 @@ static int __write_node_page(struct page *page, bool atomic, bool *submitted,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> trace_f2fs_writepage(page, NODE);
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
>>>>>> + if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
>>>>>> + if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
>>>>>> + ClearPageUptodate(page);
>>>>>> + dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES);
>>>>>> + unlock_page(page);
>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>> goto redirty_out;
>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING)))
>>>>>> goto redirty_out;
>>>>>>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
>>> .
>>>
> .
>

2020-05-27 20:58:34

by Jaegeuk Kim

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: avoid inifinite loop to wait for flushing node pages at cp_error

On 05/27, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2020/5/26 9:56, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 05/26, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> On 2020/5/26 9:11, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>> On 2020/5/25 23:06, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>>> On 05/25, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>>>> On 2020/5/25 11:56, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>>>>> Shutdown test is somtimes hung, since it keeps trying to flush dirty node pages
>
> 71.07% 0.01% kworker/u256:1+ [kernel.kallsyms] [k] wb_writeback
> |
> --71.06%--wb_writeback
> |
> |--68.96%--__writeback_inodes_wb
> | |
> | --68.95%--writeback_sb_inodes
> | |
> | |--65.08%--__writeback_single_inode
> | | |
> | | --64.35%--do_writepages
> | | |
> | | |--59.83%--f2fs_write_node_pages
> | | | |
> | | | --59.74%--f2fs_sync_node_pages
> | | | |
> | | | |--27.91%--pagevec_lookup_range_tag
> | | | | |
> | | | | --27.90%--find_get_pages_range_tag
>
> Before umount, kworker will always hold one core, that looks not reasonable,
> to avoid that, could we just allow node write, since it's out-place-update,
> and cp is not allowed, we don't need to worry about its effect on data on
> previous checkpoint, and it can decrease memory footprint cost by node pages.

It can cause some roll-forward recovery?

>
> Thanks,
>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> IMO, for umount case, we should drop dirty reference and dirty pages on meta/data
> >>>>> pages like we change for node pages to avoid potential dead loop...
> >>>>
> >>>> I believe we're doing for them. :P
> >>>
> >>> Actually, I mean do we need to drop dirty meta/data pages explicitly as below:
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> >>> index 3dc3ac6fe143..4c08fd0a680a 100644
> >>> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> >>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> >>> @@ -299,8 +299,15 @@ static int __f2fs_write_meta_page(struct page *page,
> >>>
> >>> trace_f2fs_writepage(page, META);
> >>>
> >>> - if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
> >>> + if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
> >>> + if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
> >>> + ClearPageUptodate(page);
> >>> + dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_META);
> >>> + unlock_page(page);
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> + }
> >>> goto redirty_out;
> >>> + }
> >>> if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING)))
> >>> goto redirty_out;
> >>> if (wbc->for_reclaim && page->index < GET_SUM_BLOCK(sbi, 0))
> >>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> >>> index 48a622b95b76..94b342802513 100644
> >>> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
> >>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
> >>> @@ -2682,6 +2682,12 @@ int f2fs_write_single_data_page(struct page *page, int *submitted,
> >>>
> >>> /* we should bypass data pages to proceed the kworkder jobs */
> >>> if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
> >>> + if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
> >>> + ClearPageUptodate(page);
> >>> + inode_dec_dirty_pages(inode);
> >>> + unlock_page(page);
> >>> + return 0;
> >>> + }
> >>
> >> Oh, I notice previously, we will drop non-directory inode's dirty pages directly,
> >> however, during umount, we'd better drop directory inode's dirty pages as well, right?
> >
> > Hmm, I remember I dropped them before. Need to double check.
> >
> >>
> >>> mapping_set_error(page->mapping, -EIO);
> >>> /*
> >>> * don't drop any dirty dentry pages for keeping lastest
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> in an inifinite loop. Let's drop dirty pages at umount in that case.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
> >>>>>> ---
> >>>>>> v3:
> >>>>>> - fix wrong unlock
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> v2:
> >>>>>> - fix typos
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> fs/f2fs/node.c | 9 ++++++++-
> >>>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >>>>>> index e632de10aedab..e0bb0f7e0506e 100644
> >>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
> >>>>>> @@ -1520,8 +1520,15 @@ static int __write_node_page(struct page *page, bool atomic, bool *submitted,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> trace_f2fs_writepage(page, NODE);
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> - if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
> >>>>>> + if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
> >>>>>> + if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
> >>>>>> + ClearPageUptodate(page);
> >>>>>> + dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES);
> >>>>>> + unlock_page(page);
> >>>>>> + return 0;
> >>>>>> + }
> >>>>>> goto redirty_out;
> >>>>>> + }
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING)))
> >>>>>> goto redirty_out;
> >>>>>>
> >>>> .
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
> >>> .
> >>>
> > .
> >

2020-05-28 01:23:08

by Chao Yu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v3] f2fs: avoid inifinite loop to wait for flushing node pages at cp_error

On 2020/5/28 4:56, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 05/27, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2020/5/26 9:56, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 05/26, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>> On 2020/5/26 9:11, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>> On 2020/5/25 23:06, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>>> On 05/25, Chao Yu wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2020/5/25 11:56, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>>>>>>> Shutdown test is somtimes hung, since it keeps trying to flush dirty node pages
>>
>> 71.07% 0.01% kworker/u256:1+ [kernel.kallsyms] [k] wb_writeback
>> |
>> --71.06%--wb_writeback
>> |
>> |--68.96%--__writeback_inodes_wb
>> | |
>> | --68.95%--writeback_sb_inodes
>> | |
>> | |--65.08%--__writeback_single_inode
>> | | |
>> | | --64.35%--do_writepages
>> | | |
>> | | |--59.83%--f2fs_write_node_pages
>> | | | |
>> | | | --59.74%--f2fs_sync_node_pages
>> | | | |
>> | | | |--27.91%--pagevec_lookup_range_tag
>> | | | | |
>> | | | | --27.90%--find_get_pages_range_tag
>>
>> Before umount, kworker will always hold one core, that looks not reasonable,
>> to avoid that, could we just allow node write, since it's out-place-update,
>> and cp is not allowed, we don't need to worry about its effect on data on
>> previous checkpoint, and it can decrease memory footprint cost by node pages.
>
> It can cause some roll-forward recovery?

Yup, recovery should be considered,

Later fsync() will fail due to:

int f2fs_sync_file(struct file *file, loff_t start, loff_t end, int datasync)
{
if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(F2FS_I_SB(file_inode(file)))))
return -EIO;


And we need to adjust f2fs_fsync_node_pages() to handle in-process fsyncing node
pages as well:

if (f2fs_cp_error()) {
set_fsync_mark(page, 0);
set_dentry_mark(page, 0);
if (atomic) {
unlock & put page;
ret = -EIO;
break;
}
}

ret = __write_node_page();

Thanks,

>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> IMO, for umount case, we should drop dirty reference and dirty pages on meta/data
>>>>>>> pages like we change for node pages to avoid potential dead loop...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe we're doing for them. :P
>>>>>
>>>>> Actually, I mean do we need to drop dirty meta/data pages explicitly as below:
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>>>>> index 3dc3ac6fe143..4c08fd0a680a 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
>>>>> @@ -299,8 +299,15 @@ static int __f2fs_write_meta_page(struct page *page,
>>>>>
>>>>> trace_f2fs_writepage(page, META);
>>>>>
>>>>> - if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
>>>>> + if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
>>>>> + if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
>>>>> + ClearPageUptodate(page);
>>>>> + dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_META);
>>>>> + unlock_page(page);
>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> goto redirty_out;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING)))
>>>>> goto redirty_out;
>>>>> if (wbc->for_reclaim && page->index < GET_SUM_BLOCK(sbi, 0))
>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/data.c b/fs/f2fs/data.c
>>>>> index 48a622b95b76..94b342802513 100644
>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/data.c
>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/data.c
>>>>> @@ -2682,6 +2682,12 @@ int f2fs_write_single_data_page(struct page *page, int *submitted,
>>>>>
>>>>> /* we should bypass data pages to proceed the kworkder jobs */
>>>>> if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
>>>>> + if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
>>>>> + ClearPageUptodate(page);
>>>>> + inode_dec_dirty_pages(inode);
>>>>> + unlock_page(page);
>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>> + }
>>>>
>>>> Oh, I notice previously, we will drop non-directory inode's dirty pages directly,
>>>> however, during umount, we'd better drop directory inode's dirty pages as well, right?
>>>
>>> Hmm, I remember I dropped them before. Need to double check.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>> mapping_set_error(page->mapping, -EIO);
>>>>> /*
>>>>> * don't drop any dirty dentry pages for keeping lastest
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> in an inifinite loop. Let's drop dirty pages at umount in that case.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> v3:
>>>>>>>> - fix wrong unlock
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> v2:
>>>>>>>> - fix typos
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> fs/f2fs/node.c | 9 ++++++++-
>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/node.c b/fs/f2fs/node.c
>>>>>>>> index e632de10aedab..e0bb0f7e0506e 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/node.c
>>>>>>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/node.c
>>>>>>>> @@ -1520,8 +1520,15 @@ static int __write_node_page(struct page *page, bool atomic, bool *submitted,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> trace_f2fs_writepage(page, NODE);
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi)))
>>>>>>>> + if (unlikely(f2fs_cp_error(sbi))) {
>>>>>>>> + if (is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_IS_CLOSE)) {
>>>>>>>> + ClearPageUptodate(page);
>>>>>>>> + dec_page_count(sbi, F2FS_DIRTY_NODES);
>>>>>>>> + unlock_page(page);
>>>>>>>> + return 0;
>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>> goto redirty_out;
>>>>>>>> + }
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> if (unlikely(is_sbi_flag_set(sbi, SBI_POR_DOING)))
>>>>>>>> goto redirty_out;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>> .
>>>
> .
>