2020-06-17 16:50:35

by Andrea Parri

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 5/8] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Use channel_mutex in channel_vp_mapping_show()

The primitive currently uses channel->lock to protect the loop over
sc_list w.r.t. list additions/deletions but it doesn't protect the
target_cpu(s) loads w.r.t. a concurrent target_cpu_store(): while the
data races on target_cpu are hardly of any concern here, replace the
channel->lock critical section with a channel_mutex critical section
and extend the latter to include the loads of target_cpu; this same
pattern is also used in hv_synic_cleanup().

Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri (Microsoft) <[email protected]>
---
drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
index b5ae45eb8aef7..9e39692dc13ee 100644
--- a/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c
@@ -507,18 +507,17 @@ static ssize_t channel_vp_mapping_show(struct device *dev,
{
struct hv_device *hv_dev = device_to_hv_device(dev);
struct vmbus_channel *channel = hv_dev->channel, *cur_sc;
- unsigned long flags;
int buf_size = PAGE_SIZE, n_written, tot_written;
struct list_head *cur;

if (!channel)
return -ENODEV;

+ mutex_lock(&vmbus_connection.channel_mutex);
+
tot_written = snprintf(buf, buf_size, "%u:%u\n",
channel->offermsg.child_relid, channel->target_cpu);

- spin_lock_irqsave(&channel->lock, flags);
-
list_for_each(cur, &channel->sc_list) {
if (tot_written >= buf_size - 1)
break;
@@ -532,7 +531,7 @@ static ssize_t channel_vp_mapping_show(struct device *dev,
tot_written += n_written;
}

- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&channel->lock, flags);
+ mutex_unlock(&vmbus_connection.channel_mutex);

return tot_written;
}
--
2.25.1


2020-06-18 20:42:57

by Michael Kelley (LINUX)

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: RE: [PATCH 5/8] Drivers: hv: vmbus: Use channel_mutex in channel_vp_mapping_show()

From: Andrea Parri (Microsoft) <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, June 17, 2020 9:47 AM
>
> The primitive currently uses channel->lock to protect the loop over
> sc_list w.r.t. list additions/deletions but it doesn't protect the
> target_cpu(s) loads w.r.t. a concurrent target_cpu_store(): while the
> data races on target_cpu are hardly of any concern here, replace the
> channel->lock critical section with a channel_mutex critical section
> and extend the latter to include the loads of target_cpu; this same
> pattern is also used in hv_synic_cleanup().
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri (Microsoft) <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/hv/vmbus_drv.c | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Reviewed-By: Michael Kelley <[email protected]>