2020-06-22 15:05:57

by Hsin-Yi Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v2] drm/mediatek: check plane visibility in atomic_update

Disable the plane if it's not visible. Otherwise mtk_ovl_layer_config()
would proceed with invalid plane and we may see vblank timeout.

Fixes: 119f5173628a ("drm/mediatek: Add DRM Driver for Mediatek SoC MT8173.")
Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <[email protected]>
---
v2: Add fixes tag
---
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_plane.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_plane.c
index c2bd683a87c8..74dc71c7f3b6 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_plane.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_plane.c
@@ -164,6 +164,16 @@ static int mtk_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
true, true);
}

+static void mtk_plane_atomic_disable(struct drm_plane *plane,
+ struct drm_plane_state *old_state)
+{
+ struct mtk_plane_state *state = to_mtk_plane_state(plane->state);
+
+ state->pending.enable = false;
+ wmb(); /* Make sure the above parameter is set before update */
+ state->pending.dirty = true;
+}
+
static void mtk_plane_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
struct drm_plane_state *old_state)
{
@@ -178,6 +188,9 @@ static void mtk_plane_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
if (!crtc || WARN_ON(!fb))
return;

+ if (!plane->state->visible)
+ return mtk_plane_atomic_disable(plane, old_state);
+
gem = fb->obj[0];
mtk_gem = to_mtk_gem_obj(gem);
addr = mtk_gem->dma_addr;
@@ -200,16 +213,6 @@ static void mtk_plane_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
state->pending.dirty = true;
}

-static void mtk_plane_atomic_disable(struct drm_plane *plane,
- struct drm_plane_state *old_state)
-{
- struct mtk_plane_state *state = to_mtk_plane_state(plane->state);
-
- state->pending.enable = false;
- wmb(); /* Make sure the above parameter is set before update */
- state->pending.dirty = true;
-}
-
static const struct drm_plane_helper_funcs mtk_plane_helper_funcs = {
.prepare_fb = drm_gem_fb_prepare_fb,
.atomic_check = mtk_plane_atomic_check,
--
2.27.0.111.gc72c7da667-goog


2020-06-22 15:24:42

by Tomasz Figa

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/mediatek: check plane visibility in atomic_update

Hi Hsin-Yi,

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:01:09PM +0800, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
> Disable the plane if it's not visible. Otherwise mtk_ovl_layer_config()
> would proceed with invalid plane and we may see vblank timeout.
>
> Fixes: 119f5173628a ("drm/mediatek: Add DRM Driver for Mediatek SoC MT8173.")
> Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <[email protected]>
> ---
> v2: Add fixes tag
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_plane.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>

Thank you for the patch. Please see my comments inline.

> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_plane.c
> index c2bd683a87c8..74dc71c7f3b6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_plane.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_plane.c
> @@ -164,6 +164,16 @@ static int mtk_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
> true, true);
> }
>
> +static void mtk_plane_atomic_disable(struct drm_plane *plane,
> + struct drm_plane_state *old_state)
> +{
> + struct mtk_plane_state *state = to_mtk_plane_state(plane->state);
> +
> + state->pending.enable = false;
> + wmb(); /* Make sure the above parameter is set before update */
> + state->pending.dirty = true;
> +}
> +
> static void mtk_plane_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
> struct drm_plane_state *old_state)
> {
> @@ -178,6 +188,9 @@ static void mtk_plane_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
> if (!crtc || WARN_ON(!fb))
> return;
>
> + if (!plane->state->visible)
> + return mtk_plane_atomic_disable(plane, old_state);

nit: Both this function and mtk_plane_atomic_disable() have the void return
type. Perhaps we should rather move the return, without a value, to a
separate statement?

Best regards,
Tomasz

2020-06-22 15:34:56

by Hsin-Yi Wang

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/mediatek: check plane visibility in atomic_update

On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:20 PM Tomasz Figa <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hi Hsin-Yi,
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2020 at 11:01:09PM +0800, Hsin-Yi Wang wrote:
> > Disable the plane if it's not visible. Otherwise mtk_ovl_layer_config()
> > would proceed with invalid plane and we may see vblank timeout.
> >
> > Fixes: 119f5173628a ("drm/mediatek: Add DRM Driver for Mediatek SoC MT8173.")
> > Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <[email protected]>
> > Reviewed-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > v2: Add fixes tag
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_plane.c | 23 +++++++++++++----------
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
> >
>
> Thank you for the patch. Please see my comments inline.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_plane.c
> > index c2bd683a87c8..74dc71c7f3b6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_plane.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_plane.c
> > @@ -164,6 +164,16 @@ static int mtk_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *plane,
> > true, true);
> > }
> >
> > +static void mtk_plane_atomic_disable(struct drm_plane *plane,
> > + struct drm_plane_state *old_state)
> > +{
> > + struct mtk_plane_state *state = to_mtk_plane_state(plane->state);
> > +
> > + state->pending.enable = false;
> > + wmb(); /* Make sure the above parameter is set before update */
> > + state->pending.dirty = true;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void mtk_plane_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
> > struct drm_plane_state *old_state)
> > {
> > @@ -178,6 +188,9 @@ static void mtk_plane_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane,
> > if (!crtc || WARN_ON(!fb))
> > return;
> >
> > + if (!plane->state->visible)
> > + return mtk_plane_atomic_disable(plane, old_state);
>
> nit: Both this function and mtk_plane_atomic_disable() have the void return
> type. Perhaps we should rather move the return, without a value, to a
> separate statement?
Updated in v3, thanks.

>
> Best regards,
> Tomasz