2020-07-01 13:26:21

by Benjamin GAIGNARD

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/5] STM32 ETZPC bus controller

STM32 Extended TrustZone Protection controller act like a firewall on the
platform bus. Depending of its configuration devices could be accessible
by the TrustZone, the co-processor or the non-secure world. ETZPC
configuration could evolve at runtime for example to switch a device from
non-secure world to co-processor.

The series introduce 'firewall' helpers to handle the new devices-tree
properties. These properties are not dedicated to ETZPC and will be reused
for STM32 next generation of bus controller.

version 4:
- use bus API

version 3:
- add description in firewall consumer bindings
- add Linus reviewed-by tag

version 2:
- fix unit name into st,stm32-etzpc.yaml example and DT


Benjamin Gaignard (5):
dt-bindings: bus: Add firewall bindings
bus: stm32: Introduce firewall controller helpers
dt-bindings: bus: Add STM32 ETZPC firewall controller
bus: stm32: Add stm32 ETZPC firewall bus controller
ARM: dts: stm32: Use ETZPC firewall bus

.../bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-consumer.yaml | 36 +++
.../bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-provider.yaml | 18 ++
.../bindings/bus/stm32/st,stm32-etzpc.yaml | 46 ++++
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi | 7 +-
drivers/bus/Kconfig | 2 +
drivers/bus/Makefile | 2 +
drivers/bus/stm32/Kconfig | 11 +
drivers/bus/stm32/Makefile | 2 +
drivers/bus/stm32/firewall.c | 251 +++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/bus/stm32/firewall.h | 66 ++++++
drivers/bus/stm32/stm32-etzpc.c | 163 +++++++++++++
include/dt-bindings/bus/stm32/stm32-etzpc.h | 90 ++++++++
12 files changed, 692 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-consumer.yaml
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-provider.yaml
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/st,stm32-etzpc.yaml
create mode 100644 drivers/bus/stm32/Kconfig
create mode 100644 drivers/bus/stm32/Makefile
create mode 100644 drivers/bus/stm32/firewall.c
create mode 100644 drivers/bus/stm32/firewall.h
create mode 100644 drivers/bus/stm32/stm32-etzpc.c
create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/bus/stm32/stm32-etzpc.h

--
2.15.0


2020-07-01 13:26:28

by Benjamin GAIGNARD

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: bus: Add firewall bindings

Add schemas for firewall consumer and provider.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
---
.../bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-consumer.yaml | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++
.../bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-provider.yaml | 18 +++++++++++
2 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-consumer.yaml
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-provider.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-consumer.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-consumer.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..d3d76f99b38d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-consumer.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/bus/stm32/firewall-consumer.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Common Bus Firewall consumer binding
+
+description: |
+ Firewall properties provide the possible firewall bus controller
+ configurations for a device.
+ Bus firewall controllers are typically used to control if a hardware
+ block can perform read or write operations on bus.
+ The contents of the firewall bus configuration properties are defined by
+ the binding for the individual firewall controller device.
+
+ The first configuration 'firewall-0' or the one named 'default' is
+ applied before probing the device itself.
+
+maintainers:
+ - Benjamin Gaignard <[email protected]>
+
+# always select the core schema
+select: true
+
+properties:
+ firewall-0: true
+
+ firewall-names: true
+
+patternProperties:
+ "firewall-[0-9]":
+ $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array"
+
+dependencies:
+ firewall-names: [ firewall-0 ]
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-provider.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-provider.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..299824c620ea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-provider.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/bus/stm32/firewall-provider.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: Common Bus Firewall provider binding
+
+maintainers:
+ - Benjamin Gaignard <[email protected]>
+
+properties:
+ '#firewall-cells':
+ $ref: /schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/uint32
+ description: Number of cells in a bus firewall specifier
+
+required:
+ - '#firewall-cells'
--
2.15.0

2020-07-01 13:26:47

by Benjamin GAIGNARD

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4 5/5] ARM: dts: stm32: Use ETZPC firewall bus

Allow STM32 ETZPC to check firewall configuration before populating
the platform bus.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi | 7 +++++--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi
index 3ea05ba48215..0290eb6f3c35 100644
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/stm32mp151.dtsi
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
* Author: Ludovic Barre <[email protected]> for STMicroelectronics.
*/
#include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
+#include <dt-bindings/bus/stm32/stm32-etzpc.h>
#include <dt-bindings/clock/stm32mp1-clks.h>
#include <dt-bindings/reset/stm32mp1-resets.h>

@@ -110,8 +111,10 @@
status = "disabled";
};

- soc {
- compatible = "simple-bus";
+ etzpc_bus: soc@5c007000 {
+ compatible = "st,stm32-etzpc-bus", "simple-bus";
+ reg = <0x5c007000 0x400>;
+ #firewall-cells = <2>;
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <1>;
interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
--
2.15.0

2020-07-01 13:26:52

by Benjamin GAIGNARD

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/5] bus: stm32: Introduce firewall controller helpers

The goal of these helpers are to offer an interface for the
hardware blocks controlling bus accesses rights.

Bus firewall controllers are typically used to control if a
hardware block can perform read or write operations on bus.

Smarter firewall controllers could be able to define accesses
rights per hardware blocks to control where they can read
or write.

Firewall controller configurations are provided in device node,
parsed by the helpers and send to the driver to apply them.
Each controller may need different number and type of inputs
to configure the firewall so device-tree properties size have to
be define by using "#firewall-cells".
Firewall configurations properties have to be named "firewall-X"
on device node.
"firewall-names" keyword can also be used to give a name to
a specific configuration.

Example of device-tree:
ctrl0: firewall@0 {
#firewall-cells = <2>;
};

foo: foo@0 {
firewall-names = "default", "setting1";
firewall-0 = <&ctrl0 1 2>;
firewall-1 = <&ctrl0 3 4>;
};

Configurations could be applied with functions like
firewall_set_config_by_index() or firewall_set_config_by_name().

firewall_set_default_config() function will apply the
configuration named "default" (if existing) or the configuration
with index 0 (i.e. firewall-0).

Drivers could register/unregister themselves be calling
firewall_register/firewall_unregister functions.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <[email protected]>
---
version 4:
- use bus API

drivers/bus/Kconfig | 2 +
drivers/bus/Makefile | 2 +
drivers/bus/stm32/Kconfig | 3 +
drivers/bus/stm32/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/bus/stm32/firewall.c | 251 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/bus/stm32/firewall.h | 66 ++++++++++++
6 files changed, 325 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/bus/stm32/Kconfig
create mode 100644 drivers/bus/stm32/Makefile
create mode 100644 drivers/bus/stm32/firewall.c
create mode 100644 drivers/bus/stm32/firewall.h

diff --git a/drivers/bus/Kconfig b/drivers/bus/Kconfig
index 6d4e4497b59b..843b356322d9 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/bus/Kconfig
@@ -203,4 +203,6 @@ config DA8XX_MSTPRI
source "drivers/bus/fsl-mc/Kconfig"
source "drivers/bus/mhi/Kconfig"

+source "drivers/bus/stm32/Kconfig"
+
endmenu
diff --git a/drivers/bus/Makefile b/drivers/bus/Makefile
index 05f32cd694a4..5e0e34b10235 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/bus/Makefile
@@ -37,3 +37,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_DA8XX_MSTPRI) += da8xx-mstpri.o

# MHI
obj-$(CONFIG_MHI_BUS) += mhi/
+
+obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_STM32MP157) += stm32/
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/drivers/bus/stm32/Kconfig b/drivers/bus/stm32/Kconfig
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..57221e833e2d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/bus/stm32/Kconfig
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+config FIREWALL_CONTROLLERS
+ bool "Support of bus firewall controllers"
+ depends on OF
diff --git a/drivers/bus/stm32/Makefile b/drivers/bus/stm32/Makefile
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..eb6b978d6450
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/bus/stm32/Makefile
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+obj-$(CONFIG_FIREWALL_CONTROLLERS) += firewall.o
diff --git a/drivers/bus/stm32/firewall.c b/drivers/bus/stm32/firewall.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..234571b8ad11
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/bus/stm32/firewall.c
@@ -0,0 +1,251 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) STMicroelectronics 2020 - All Rights Reserved
+ * Author: Benjamin Gaignard <[email protected]> for STMicroelectronics.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/device.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/list.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
+#include "firewall.h"
+
+struct firewall_device {
+ struct device dev;
+ struct firewall_ops *ops;
+};
+
+struct device firewall_bus = {
+ .init_name = "firewall",
+};
+
+static inline struct firewall_device *to_firewall_device(struct device *d)
+{
+ return container_of(d, struct firewall_device, dev);
+}
+
+static struct bus_type firewall_bus_type = {
+ .name = "firewall",
+};
+
+static struct firewall_device *firewall_from_node(struct device_node *np)
+{
+ struct device *dev;
+
+ dev = bus_find_device_by_of_node(&firewall_bus_type, np);
+
+ return dev ? to_firewall_device(dev) : NULL;
+}
+
+/**
+ * firewall_dt_has_default
+ *
+ * Check if the device node provide firewall configuration
+ *
+ * @np: device node with possible firewall configuration
+ *
+ * Return: true is firewall-0 property exist in the device node
+ */
+static bool firewall_dt_has_default(struct device_node *np)
+{
+ struct property *prop;
+ int size;
+
+ if (!np)
+ return false;
+
+ prop = of_find_property(np, "firewall-0", &size);
+
+ return prop ? true : false;
+}
+
+/**
+ * firewall_set_config_by_index
+ *
+ * Set a firewall controller configuration based on given index.
+ *
+ * @np: device node with firewall configuration to apply.
+ * @index: the index of the configuration in device node.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 if OK, -EPROBE_DEFER if waiting for firewall controller to be
+ * registered or negative value on other errors.
+ */
+int firewall_set_config_by_index(struct device_node *np, int index)
+{
+ char *propname;
+ int configs, i, err = 0;
+
+ if (!np)
+ return 0;
+
+ propname = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "firewall-%d", index);
+ configs = of_count_phandle_with_args(np, propname, "#firewall-cells");
+ if (configs < 0) {
+ err = -EINVAL;
+ goto error;
+ }
+
+ for (i = 0; i < configs; i++) {
+ struct firewall_device *firewall;
+ struct of_phandle_args args;
+
+ err = of_parse_phandle_with_args(np, propname,
+ "#firewall-cells",
+ i, &args);
+ if (err)
+ goto error;
+
+ /* Test if the controller is (or will be) available */
+ if (!of_device_is_available(args.np)) {
+ of_node_put(args.np);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ firewall = firewall_from_node(args.np);
+ of_node_put(args.np);
+
+ /* Firewall is not yet registered */
+ if (!firewall) {
+ err = -EPROBE_DEFER;
+ goto error;
+ }
+
+ err = firewall->ops->set_config(&firewall->dev, &args);
+ if (err)
+ goto error;
+ }
+
+error:
+ kfree(propname);
+ return err;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(firewall_set_config_by_index);
+
+/**
+ * firewall_set_config_by_name
+ *
+ * Set a firwall controller configuration based on given name.
+ *
+ * @np: device node with firewall configuration to apply.
+ * @name: the name of the configuration in device node.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 if OK, -EPROBE_DEFER if waiting for firewall controller to be
+ * registered or negative value on other errors.
+ */
+int firewall_set_config_by_name(struct device_node *np, char *name)
+{
+ const char *configname;
+ int count, i;
+
+ count = of_property_count_strings(np, "firewall-names");
+ for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+ int err;
+
+ err = of_property_read_string_index(np,
+ "firewall-names",
+ i, &configname);
+ if (err)
+ return err;
+
+ if (strcmp(name, configname))
+ continue;
+
+ return firewall_set_config_by_index(np, i);
+ }
+
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(firewall_set_config_by_name);
+
+/**
+ * firewall_set_default_config
+ *
+ * Set the default configuration for device.
+ * First try to apply configuration named "default", if it fails
+ * or doesn't exist, try to apply firewall-0 configuration.
+ *
+ * @np: device node with firewall configuration to apply.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 if OK, -EPROBE_DEFER if waiting for firewall controller to be
+ * registered or negative value on other errors.
+ */
+int firewall_set_default_config(struct device_node *np)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ /* Nothing to do if device node doesn't contain at least
+ * one configuration
+ */
+ if (!firewall_dt_has_default(np))
+ return 0;
+
+ ret = firewall_set_config_by_name(np, "default");
+ if (!ret || (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER))
+ return ret;
+
+ return firewall_set_config_by_index(np, 0);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(firewall_set_default_config);
+
+/**
+ * firewall_register
+ *
+ * Register a firewall controller.
+ *
+ * @np: node implementing firewall controller.
+ * @ops: firewall controller operations.
+ *
+ * Return: a pointer on the device if OK or NULL on error.
+ */
+struct device *firewall_register(struct device_node *np,
+ struct firewall_ops *ops)
+{
+ struct firewall_device *firewall;
+
+ if (!np || !ops || !ops->set_config)
+ return NULL;
+
+ firewall = kzalloc(sizeof(*firewall), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!firewall)
+ return NULL;
+
+ device_initialize(&firewall->dev);
+ firewall->dev.init_name = devm_kstrdup(&firewall->dev,
+ np->name, GFP_KERNEL);
+ firewall->dev.bus = &firewall_bus_type;
+ firewall->dev.parent = &firewall_bus;
+ firewall->dev.of_node = np;
+ firewall->ops = ops;
+
+ if (device_add(&firewall->dev)) {
+ kfree(firewall);
+ return NULL;
+ }
+
+ return &firewall->dev;
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(firewall_register);
+
+static int __init firewall_init(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = device_register(&firewall_bus);
+ if (ret) {
+ put_device(&firewall_bus);
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ ret = bus_register(&firewall_bus_type);
+ if (ret)
+ device_unregister(&firewall_bus);
+
+ return ret;
+}
+
+/* Init early since drivers really need to configure firewall early */
+core_initcall(firewall_init);
diff --git a/drivers/bus/stm32/firewall.h b/drivers/bus/stm32/firewall.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ea38f9f7e4ee
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/bus/stm32/firewall.h
@@ -0,0 +1,66 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) STMicroelectronics 2020 - All Rights Reserved
+ * Author: Benjamin Gaignard <[email protected]> for STMicroelectronics.
+ */
+
+#ifndef _FIREWALL_H_
+#define _FIREWALL_H_
+
+#include <linux/device.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+
+/**
+ * struct firewall_ops
+ *
+ * Firewall controller operations structure to be filled by drivers.
+ */
+struct firewall_ops {
+ /**
+ * @set_config:
+ *
+ * Driver callback to set a firewall configuration on a controller.
+ * Configuration arguments are provided in out_args parameter.
+ *
+ * Return: 0 on success, a negative error code on failure.
+ */
+ int (*set_config)(struct device *dev, struct of_phandle_args *out_args);
+};
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_FIREWALL_CONTROLLERS
+
+int firewall_set_config_by_index(struct device_node *np, int index);
+int firewall_set_config_by_name(struct device_node *np, char *name);
+int firewall_set_default_config(struct device_node *np);
+
+struct device *firewall_register(struct device_node *np,
+ struct firewall_ops *ops);
+
+#else
+
+static inline int firewall_set_config_by_index(struct device_node *np,
+ int index)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int firewall_set_config_by_name(struct device_node *np,
+ char *name)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline int firewall_set_default_config(struct device_node *np)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static inline struct device *firewall_register(struct device_node *np,
+ struct firewall_ops *ops)
+{
+ return NULL;
+}
+
+#endif
+
+#endif /* _FIREWALL_H_ */
--
2.15.0

2020-07-01 13:26:56

by Benjamin GAIGNARD

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/5] dt-bindings: bus: Add STM32 ETZPC firewall controller

Document STM32 ETZPC firewall controller bindings

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <[email protected]>
---
.../bindings/bus/stm32/st,stm32-etzpc.yaml | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/st,stm32-etzpc.yaml

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/st,stm32-etzpc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/st,stm32-etzpc.yaml
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..d92865fda40c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/st,stm32-etzpc.yaml
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
+%YAML 1.2
+---
+$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/bus/stm32/st,stm32-etzpc.yaml#
+$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
+
+title: STM32 Extended TrustZone Protection controller
+
+maintainers:
+ - Benjamin Gaignard <[email protected]>
+
+description: STMicroelectronics's STM32 firewall bus controller implementation
+
+allOf:
+ - $ref: "firewall-provider.yaml#"
+ - $ref: /schemas/simple-bus.yaml#
+
+properties:
+ compatible:
+ contains:
+ enum:
+ - st,stm32-etzpc-bus
+
+ reg:
+ maxItems: 1
+
+ '#firewall-cells':
+ const: 2
+
+required:
+ - compatible
+ - reg
+ - '#firewall-cells'
+
+examples:
+ - |
+ soc@5c007000 {
+ compatible = "st,stm32-etzpc-bus", "simple-bus";
+ reg = <0x5c007000 0x400>;
+ #firewall-cells = <2>;
+ #address-cells = <1>;
+ #size-cells = <1>;
+ ranges;
+ };
+
+...
--
2.15.0

2020-07-01 13:26:57

by Benjamin GAIGNARD

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v4 4/5] bus: stm32: Add stm32 ETZPC firewall bus controller

Add STM32 Extended TrustZone Protection bus controller.
For each of device-tree nodes it will check and apply
firewall configuration. If it doesn't match the device
will not be probed by platform bus.

A device could be configured to be accessible by trusted world,
co-processor or non-secure world.

Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <[email protected]>
---
drivers/bus/stm32/Kconfig | 8 ++
drivers/bus/stm32/Makefile | 1 +
drivers/bus/stm32/stm32-etzpc.c | 163 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
include/dt-bindings/bus/stm32/stm32-etzpc.h | 90 +++++++++++++++
4 files changed, 262 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 drivers/bus/stm32/stm32-etzpc.c
create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/bus/stm32/stm32-etzpc.h

diff --git a/drivers/bus/stm32/Kconfig b/drivers/bus/stm32/Kconfig
index 57221e833e2d..5dc6e2504de5 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/stm32/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/bus/stm32/Kconfig
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
config FIREWALL_CONTROLLERS
bool "Support of bus firewall controllers"
depends on OF
+
+config STM32_ETZPC
+ bool "STM32 ETZPC bus controller"
+ depends on MACH_STM32MP157
+ select FIREWALL_CONTROLLERS
+ help
+ Select y to enable STM32 Extended TrustZone Protection
+ Controller (ETZPC)
diff --git a/drivers/bus/stm32/Makefile b/drivers/bus/stm32/Makefile
index eb6b978d6450..d42e99b5865e 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/stm32/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/bus/stm32/Makefile
@@ -1 +1,2 @@
obj-$(CONFIG_FIREWALL_CONTROLLERS) += firewall.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_STM32_ETZPC) += stm32-etzpc.o
diff --git a/drivers/bus/stm32/stm32-etzpc.c b/drivers/bus/stm32/stm32-etzpc.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..ad0e16eea66b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/bus/stm32/stm32-etzpc.c
@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) STMicroelectronics 2020 - All Rights Reserved
+ * Author: Benjamin Gaignard <[email protected]> for STMicroelectronics.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/device.h>
+#include <linux/err.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/of_platform.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/regmap.h>
+
+#include <dt-bindings/bus/stm32/stm32-etzpc.h>
+
+#include "firewall.h"
+
+#define ETZPC_DECPROT 0x010
+#define ETZPC_NUM_LOCKS 94
+
+struct stm32_etzpc {
+ struct regmap_field *fields[ETZPC_NUM_LOCKS];
+};
+
+static int stm32_etzpc_set_config(struct device *dev,
+ struct of_phandle_args *out_args)
+{
+ struct stm32_etzpc *etzpc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+ int index = out_args->args[0];
+ unsigned int value = out_args->args[1];
+ u32 status;
+
+ if (out_args->args_count != 2)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (index >= ETZPC_NUM_LOCKS)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (value > STM32_ETZPC_NON_SECURE)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ regmap_field_force_write(etzpc->fields[index], value);
+
+ /* Hardware could denied the new value, read it back to check it */
+ regmap_field_read(etzpc->fields[index], &status);
+
+ if (value != status) {
+ pr_info("failed to set configuration: index %d, value %d\n",
+ index, value);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static struct firewall_ops stm32_etzpc_ops = {
+ .set_config = stm32_etzpc_set_config,
+};
+
+static const struct regmap_config stm32_etzpc_regmap_cfg = {
+ .reg_bits = 32,
+ .val_bits = 32,
+ .reg_stride = sizeof(u32),
+ .max_register = 0x3FF,
+};
+
+static void stm32_etzpc_populate(struct device *parent)
+{
+ struct device_node *child;
+
+ if (!parent)
+ return;
+
+ for_each_available_child_of_node(dev_of_node(parent), child) {
+ if (firewall_set_default_config(child)) {
+ /*
+ * Failed to set firewall configuration mark the node
+ * as populated so platform bus won't probe it
+ */
+ of_node_set_flag(child, OF_POPULATED);
+ dev_info(parent, "%s: Bad firewall configuration\n",
+ child->name);
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+static int stm32_etzpc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+ struct stm32_etzpc *etzpc;
+ struct device *firewall;
+ struct regmap *regmap;
+ struct resource *res;
+ void __iomem *mmio;
+ int i;
+
+ etzpc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*etzpc), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!etzpc)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+ mmio = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
+ if (IS_ERR(mmio))
+ return PTR_ERR(mmio);
+
+ regmap = devm_regmap_init_mmio(&pdev->dev, mmio,
+ &stm32_etzpc_regmap_cfg);
+
+ for (i = 0; i < ETZPC_NUM_LOCKS; i++) {
+ struct reg_field field;
+
+ /*
+ * Each hardware block status is defined by
+ * a 2 bits field and all of them are packed into
+ * 32 bits registers. Do some computation to get
+ * register offset and the shift.
+ */
+ field.reg = ETZPC_DECPROT + (i >> 4) * sizeof(u32);
+ field.lsb = (i % 0x10) << 1;
+ field.msb = field.lsb + 1;
+
+ etzpc->fields[i] = devm_regmap_field_alloc(&pdev->dev,
+ regmap, field);
+ }
+
+ platform_set_drvdata(pdev, etzpc);
+
+ firewall = firewall_register(dev_of_node(&pdev->dev),
+ &stm32_etzpc_ops);
+ if (!firewall)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ dev_set_drvdata(firewall, etzpc);
+
+ stm32_etzpc_populate(&pdev->dev);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static const struct of_device_id stm32_etzpc_of_match[] = {
+ { .compatible = "st,stm32-etzpc-bus" },
+ { /* end node */ }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, stm32_etzpc_of_match);
+
+static struct platform_driver stm32_etzpc_driver = {
+ .probe = stm32_etzpc_probe,
+ .driver = {
+ .name = "stm32-etzpc",
+ .of_match_table = stm32_etzpc_of_match,
+ },
+};
+
+static int __init stm32_etzpc_init(void)
+{
+ return platform_driver_register(&stm32_etzpc_driver);
+}
+arch_initcall(stm32_etzpc_init);
+
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Benjamin Gaignard <[email protected]>");
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION("STMicroelectronics STM32 Bus Firewall Controller");
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/bus/stm32/stm32-etzpc.h b/include/dt-bindings/bus/stm32/stm32-etzpc.h
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..9c4783b9783c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/include/dt-bindings/bus/stm32/stm32-etzpc.h
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) STMicroelectronics 2020 - All Rights Reserved
+ * Author: Benjamin Gaignard <[email protected]> for STMicroelectronics.
+ */
+
+#ifndef _STM32_ETZPC_H_
+#define _STM32_ETZPC_H_
+
+/* ETZPC configurations: trust-zone, non-secure or coprocessor*/
+#define STM32_ETZPC_TRUST 1
+#define STM32_ETPCZ_COPRO 2
+#define STM32_ETZPC_NON_SECURE 3
+
+/* ETZPC hard blocks index */
+#define STM32_ETZPC_USART1 3
+#define STM32_ETZPC_SPI6 4
+#define STM32_ETZPC_I2C4 5
+#define STM32_ETZPC_RNG1 7
+#define STM32_ETZPC_HASH1 8
+#define STM32_ETZPC_CRYP1 9
+#define STM32_ETZPC_I2C6 12
+#define STM32_ETZPC_TIM2 16
+#define STM32_ETZPC_TIM3 17
+#define STM32_ETZPC_TIM4 18
+#define STM32_ETZPC_TIM5 19
+#define STM32_ETZPC_TIM6 20
+#define STM32_ETZPC_TIM7 21
+#define STM32_ETZPC_TIM12 22
+#define STM32_ETZPC_TIM13 23
+#define STM32_ETZPC_TIM14 24
+#define STM32_ETZPC_LPTIM1 25
+#define STM32_ETZPC_SPI2 27
+#define STM32_ETZPC_SPI3 28
+#define STM32_ETZPC_USART2 30
+#define STM32_ETZPC_USART3 31
+#define STM32_ETZPC_USART4 32
+#define STM32_ETZPC_USART5 33
+#define STM32_ETZPC_I2C1 34
+#define STM32_ETZPC_I2C2 35
+#define STM32_ETZPC_I2C3 36
+#define STM32_ETZPC_I2C5 37
+#define STM32_ETZPC_CEC 38
+#define STM32_ETZPC_DAC 39
+#define STM32_ETZPC_UART7 40
+#define STM32_ETZPC_UART8 41
+#define STM32_ETZPC_MDIOS 44
+#define STM32_ETZPC_TIM1 48
+#define STM32_ETZPC_TIM8 49
+#define STM32_ETZPC_USART6 51
+#define STM32_ETZPC_SPI1 52
+#define STM32_ETZPC_SPI4 53
+#define STM32_ETZPC_TIM15 54
+#define STM32_ETZPC_TIM16 55
+#define STM32_ETZPC_TIM17 56
+#define STM32_ETZPC_SPI5 57
+#define STM32_ETZPC_SAI1 58
+#define STM32_ETZPC_SAI2 59
+#define STM32_ETZPC_SAI3 60
+#define STM32_ETZPC_DFSDM 61
+#define STM32_ETZPC_TT_FDCAN 62
+#define STM32_ETZPC_LPTIM2 64
+#define STM32_ETZPC_LPTIM3 65
+#define STM32_ETZPC_LPTIM4 66
+#define STM32_ETZPC_LPTIM5 67
+#define STM32_ETZPC_SAI4 68
+#define STM32_ETZPC_VREFBUF 69
+#define STM32_ETZPC_DCMI 70
+#define STM32_ETZPC_CRC2 71
+#define STM32_ETZPC_ADC 72
+#define STM32_ETZPC_HASH2 73
+#define STM32_ETZPC_RNG2 74
+#define STM32_ETZPC_CRYP2 75
+#define STM32_ETZPC_SRAM1 80
+#define STM32_ETZPC_SRAM2 81
+#define STM32_ETZPC_SRAM3 82
+#define STM32_ETZPC_SRAM4 83
+#define STM32_ETZPC_RETRAM 84
+#define STM32_ETZPC_OTG 85
+#define STM32_ETZPC_SDMMC3 86
+#define STM32_ETZPC_DLYBSD3 87
+#define STM32_ETZPC_DMA1 88
+#define STM32_ETZPC_DMA2 89
+#define STM32_ETZPC_DMAMUX 90
+#define STM32_ETZPC_FMC 91
+#define STM32_ETZPC_QSPI 92
+#define STM32_ETZPC_DLYBQ 93
+#define STM32_ETZPC_ETH1 94
+
+#endif /* _STM32_ETZPC_H_ */
--
2.15.0

2020-07-13 17:01:51

by Rob Herring

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: bus: Add firewall bindings

On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 03:25:19PM +0200, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> Add schemas for firewall consumer and provider.
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <[email protected]>
> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-consumer.yaml | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> .../bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-provider.yaml | 18 +++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-consumer.yaml
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-provider.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-consumer.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-consumer.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d3d76f99b38d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-consumer.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/bus/stm32/firewall-consumer.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: Common Bus Firewall consumer binding

I'm all for common bindings, but I want to see more than 1 user before
accepting this. There's been some other postings for similar h/w
(AFAICT) recently.

> +
> +description: |
> + Firewall properties provide the possible firewall bus controller
> + configurations for a device.
> + Bus firewall controllers are typically used to control if a hardware
> + block can perform read or write operations on bus.
> + The contents of the firewall bus configuration properties are defined by
> + the binding for the individual firewall controller device.
> +
> + The first configuration 'firewall-0' or the one named 'default' is
> + applied before probing the device itself.

This is a Linux implementation detail and debatable whether the core
should do this or drivers.

> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Benjamin Gaignard <[email protected]>
> +
> +# always select the core schema
> +select: true
> +
> +properties:
> + firewall-0: true
> +
> + firewall-names: true
> +
> +patternProperties:
> + "firewall-[0-9]":
> + $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array"

So I guess multiple properties is to encode all the modes into DT like
pinctrl does. Is that really necessary? I don't think so as I wouldn't
expect modes to be defined by the consumer, but by the provider in this
case. To use pinctrl as a example, we could have pad setting per MMC
speed. That has to be in the consumer side as the pinctrl knows nothing
about MMC.

Rob

2020-07-13 17:06:31

by Rob Herring

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] dt-bindings: bus: Add STM32 ETZPC firewall controller

On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 03:25:21PM +0200, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> Document STM32 ETZPC firewall controller bindings
>
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <[email protected]>
> ---
> .../bindings/bus/stm32/st,stm32-etzpc.yaml | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/st,stm32-etzpc.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/st,stm32-etzpc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/st,stm32-etzpc.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d92865fda40c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/st,stm32-etzpc.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/bus/stm32/st,stm32-etzpc.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: STM32 Extended TrustZone Protection controller
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Benjamin Gaignard <[email protected]>
> +
> +description: STMicroelectronics's STM32 firewall bus controller implementation
> +
> +allOf:
> + - $ref: "firewall-provider.yaml#"
> + - $ref: /schemas/simple-bus.yaml#

Your bus has controls/setup, it's not a simple-bus.

Do you expect an old kernel or one with support for "st,stm32-etzpc-bus"
disabled to work? How's it going to know if certain nodes can't be
accessed without that support?

> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + contains:
> + enum:
> + - st,stm32-etzpc-bus
> +
> + reg:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + '#firewall-cells':
> + const: 2
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - '#firewall-cells'
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + soc@5c007000 {
> + compatible = "st,stm32-etzpc-bus", "simple-bus";
> + reg = <0x5c007000 0x400>;
> + #firewall-cells = <2>;
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> + ranges;
> + };
> +
> +...
> --
> 2.15.0
>

2020-07-20 09:20:16

by Benjamin GAIGNARD

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] dt-bindings: bus: Add firewall bindings



On 7/13/20 7:01 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 03:25:19PM +0200, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
>> Add schemas for firewall consumer and provider.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <[email protected]>
>> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-consumer.yaml | 36 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> .../bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-provider.yaml | 18 +++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 54 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-consumer.yaml
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-provider.yaml
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-consumer.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-consumer.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..d3d76f99b38d
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/firewall-consumer.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/bus/stm32/firewall-consumer.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: Common Bus Firewall consumer binding
> I'm all for common bindings, but I want to see more than 1 user before
> accepting this. There's been some other postings for similar h/w
> (AFAICT) recently.
>
>> +
>> +description: |
>> + Firewall properties provide the possible firewall bus controller
>> + configurations for a device.
>> + Bus firewall controllers are typically used to control if a hardware
>> + block can perform read or write operations on bus.
>> + The contents of the firewall bus configuration properties are defined by
>> + the binding for the individual firewall controller device.
>> +
>> + The first configuration 'firewall-0' or the one named 'default' is
>> + applied before probing the device itself.
> This is a Linux implementation detail and debatable whether the core
> should do this or drivers.
I could prefix the property with 'st,stm32' so it will dedicated to
STM32 SoCs.
Will it sound better for you ?

From Greg comments in the previous versions of this patch I understand that
it isn't something to be done in the core. The best I can do here is to
keep it as
helpers for STM32 SoCs.
>
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> + - Benjamin Gaignard <[email protected]>
>> +
>> +# always select the core schema
>> +select: true
>> +
>> +properties:
>> + firewall-0: true
>> +
>> + firewall-names: true
>> +
>> +patternProperties:
>> + "firewall-[0-9]":
>> + $ref: "/schemas/types.yaml#/definitions/phandle-array"
> So I guess multiple properties is to encode all the modes into DT like
> pinctrl does. Is that really necessary? I don't think so as I wouldn't
> expect modes to be defined by the consumer, but by the provider in this
> case. To use pinctrl as a example, we could have pad setting per MMC
> speed. That has to be in the consumer side as the pinctrl knows nothing
> about MMC.
I expect to be able to set phandle on different firewall controllers.
I don't know if it is possible with the same structure than for pins
controllers.
>
> Rob

2020-07-20 09:24:32

by Benjamin GAIGNARD

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] dt-bindings: bus: Add STM32 ETZPC firewall controller



On 7/13/20 7:05 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 03:25:21PM +0200, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
>> Document STM32 ETZPC firewall controller bindings
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Gaignard <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> .../bindings/bus/stm32/st,stm32-etzpc.yaml | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/st,stm32-etzpc.yaml
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/st,stm32-etzpc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/st,stm32-etzpc.yaml
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..d92865fda40c
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/bus/stm32/st,stm32-etzpc.yaml
>> @@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR BSD-2-Clause)
>> +%YAML 1.2
>> +---
>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/bus/stm32/st,stm32-etzpc.yaml#
>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>> +
>> +title: STM32 Extended TrustZone Protection controller
>> +
>> +maintainers:
>> + - Benjamin Gaignard <[email protected]>
>> +
>> +description: STMicroelectronics's STM32 firewall bus controller implementation
>> +
>> +allOf:
>> + - $ref: "firewall-provider.yaml#"
>> + - $ref: /schemas/simple-bus.yaml#
> Your bus has controls/setup, it's not a simple-bus.
>
> Do you expect an old kernel or one with support for "st,stm32-etzpc-bus"
> disabled to work? How's it going to know if certain nodes can't be
> accessed without that support?
It already works with simple bus.
The goal behind implementing firewall bus controllers is to expose this
in the DT
rather than hide it in the boot stages.

>
>> +
>> +properties:
>> + compatible:
>> + contains:
>> + enum:
>> + - st,stm32-etzpc-bus
>> +
>> + reg:
>> + maxItems: 1
>> +
>> + '#firewall-cells':
>> + const: 2
>> +
>> +required:
>> + - compatible
>> + - reg
>> + - '#firewall-cells'
>> +
>> +examples:
>> + - |
>> + soc@5c007000 {
>> + compatible = "st,stm32-etzpc-bus", "simple-bus";
>> + reg = <0x5c007000 0x400>;
>> + #firewall-cells = <2>;
>> + #address-cells = <1>;
>> + #size-cells = <1>;
>> + ranges;
>> + };
>> +
>> +...
>> --
>> 2.15.0
>>