Running the checkpatch.pl script on the file for which patch was created, the
following error was found to exist.
ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV)
Fixed the above error which was found on line #721 by inserting a blank
space at the appropriate position.
Signed-off-by: Anant Thazhemadam <[email protected]>
---
drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c
index 21f6652dd69f..57e171d3e48d 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c
@@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ u32 rtw_tkip_decrypt(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *precvframe)
res = _FAIL;
}
} else {
- RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_security_c_, _drv_err_, ("%s: stainfo==NULL!!!\n",__func__));
+ RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_security_c_, _drv_err_, ("%s: stainfo==NULL!!!\n", __func__));
res = _FAIL;
}
}
--
2.25.1
On 7/25/20 7:20 AM, Anant Thazhemadam wrote:
> Running the checkpatch.pl script on the file for which patch was created, the
> following error was found to exist.
> ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV)
>
> Fixed the above error which was found on line #721 by inserting a blank
> space at the appropriate position.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anant Thazhemadam <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c
> index 21f6652dd69f..57e171d3e48d 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c
> @@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ u32 rtw_tkip_decrypt(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *precvframe)
> res = _FAIL;
> }
> } else {
> - RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_security_c_, _drv_err_, ("%s: stainfo==NULL!!!\n",__func__));
> + RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_security_c_, _drv_err_, ("%s: stainfo==NULL!!!\n", __func__));
> res = _FAIL;
> }
> }
In fixing one checkpatch.pl condition, you introduced another - the resulting
line is too long. You should fix only one such condition, but you should fix any
others that are introduced. You do need to document it.
Patch subjects for this driver should be written as "staging: rtl8188eu: .....".
Larry
On Sat, 2020-07-25 at 12:47 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
> On 7/25/20 7:20 AM, Anant Thazhemadam wrote:
> > Running the checkpatch.pl script on the file for which patch was created, the
> > following error was found to exist.
> > ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV)
> >
> > Fixed the above error which was found on line #721 by inserting a blank
> > space at the appropriate position.
[]
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c
[]
> > @@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ u32 rtw_tkip_decrypt(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *precvframe)
> > res = _FAIL;
> > }
> > } else {
> > - RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_security_c_, _drv_err_, ("%s: stainfo==NULL!!!\n",__func__));
> > + RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_security_c_, _drv_err_, ("%s: stainfo==NULL!!!\n", __func__));
> > res = _FAIL;
> > }
> > }
>
> In fixing one checkpatch.pl condition, you introduced another - the resulting
> line is too long. You should fix only one such condition, but you should fix any
> others that are introduced. You do need to document it.
I think that doesn't matter as it was also too long
before this change.
> Patch subjects for this driver should be written as "staging: rtl8188eu: .....".
How likely is it that this driver would ever be
moved to drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi?
On 7/25/20 1:39 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-07-25 at 12:47 -0500, Larry Finger wrote:
>> On 7/25/20 7:20 AM, Anant Thazhemadam wrote:
>>> Running the checkpatch.pl script on the file for which patch was created, the
>>> following error was found to exist.
>>> ERROR: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV)
>>>
>>> Fixed the above error which was found on line #721 by inserting a blank
>>> space at the appropriate position.
> []
>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8188eu/core/rtw_security.c
> []
>>> @@ -718,7 +718,7 @@ u32 rtw_tkip_decrypt(struct adapter *padapter, u8 *precvframe)
>>> res = _FAIL;
>>> }
>>> } else {
>>> - RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_security_c_, _drv_err_, ("%s: stainfo==NULL!!!\n",__func__));
>>> + RT_TRACE(_module_rtl871x_security_c_, _drv_err_, ("%s: stainfo==NULL!!!\n", __func__));
>>> res = _FAIL;
>>> }
>>> }
>>
>> In fixing one checkpatch.pl condition, you introduced another - the resulting
>> line is too long. You should fix only one such condition, but you should fix any
>> others that are introduced. You do need to document it.
>
> I think that doesn't matter as it was also too long
> before this change.
>
>> Patch subjects for this driver should be written as "staging: rtl8188eu: .....".
>
> How likely is it that this driver would ever be
> moved to drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtlwifi?
Very unlikely. It I wanted to undertake that kind of effort, I would switch to
one of the later versions from Realtek that uses nl80211/cfg80211. Despite that,
it is likely that only the USB driver from rtlwifi could be used.
Larry