2020-07-29 12:50:15

by Yu Kuai

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH V2] dmaengine: bcm-sba-raid: add missing put_device() call in sba_probe()

if of_find_device_by_node() succeed, sba_probe() doesn't have a
corresponding put_device(). Thus add a jump target to fix the
exception handling for this function implementation.

Fixes: 743e1c8ffe4e ("dmaengine: Add Broadcom SBA RAID driver")
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <[email protected]>
---
changes from V1:
-forgot to add params in put_device(), sorry about that.

drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c b/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c
index 64239da02e74..322d48b397e7 100644
--- a/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c
+++ b/drivers/dma/bcm-sba-raid.c
@@ -1707,7 +1707,7 @@ static int sba_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
/* Prealloc channel resource */
ret = sba_prealloc_channel_resources(sba);
if (ret)
- goto fail_free_mchan;
+ goto put_device;

/* Check availability of debugfs */
if (!debugfs_initialized())
@@ -1737,6 +1737,8 @@ static int sba_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
fail_free_resources:
debugfs_remove_recursive(sba->root);
sba_freeup_channel_resources(sba);
+put_device:
+ put_device(&mbox_pdev->dev);
fail_free_mchan:
mbox_free_channel(sba->mchan);
return ret;
--
2.25.4


2020-07-29 18:05:18

by Markus Elfring

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] dmaengine: bcm-sba-raid: add missing put_device() call in sba_probe()

> if of_find_device_by_node() succeed, sba_probe() doesn't have a
> corresponding put_device(). …

Wording adjustment:
If a of_find_device_by_node() call succeeded, sba_probe() did not
contain a corresponding put_device() call. …

Regards,
Markus

2020-08-17 05:19:07

by Vinod Koul

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] dmaengine: bcm-sba-raid: add missing put_device() call in sba_probe()

On 29-07-20, 20:49, Yu Kuai wrote:
> if of_find_device_by_node() succeed, sba_probe() doesn't have a
> corresponding put_device(). Thus add a jump target to fix the
> exception handling for this function implementation.

Applied, thanks

--
~Vinod