2020-07-28 20:05:51

by Logan Gunthorpe

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] PCI/switechtec: Add missing __iomem and __user tags to fix sparse warnings

Fix a number of missing __iomem and __user tags in the ioctl functions of
the switchtec driver. This fixes a number of sparse warnings of the form:

sparse: sparse: incorrect type in ... (different address spaces)

Fixes: 52eabba5bcdb ("switchtec: Add IOCTLs to the Switchtec driver")
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <[email protected]>

---

Here are a couple quick patches to fix some sparse warnings I was
notified about a couple weeks ago.

I've split them into two patches based on Fixes tag, but they could be
squashed depending on the preference.

Thanks!

drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c b/drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c
index 850cfeb74608..3d5da7f44378 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c
@@ -940,7 +940,7 @@ static u32 __iomem *event_hdr_addr(struct switchtec_dev *stdev,
size_t off;

if (event_id < 0 || event_id >= SWITCHTEC_IOCTL_MAX_EVENTS)
- return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+ return (u32 __iomem *)ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);

off = event_regs[event_id].offset;

@@ -948,10 +948,10 @@ static u32 __iomem *event_hdr_addr(struct switchtec_dev *stdev,
if (index == SWITCHTEC_IOCTL_EVENT_LOCAL_PART_IDX)
index = stdev->partition;
else if (index < 0 || index >= stdev->partition_count)
- return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+ return (u32 __iomem *)ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
} else if (event_regs[event_id].map_reg == pff_ev_reg) {
if (index < 0 || index >= stdev->pff_csr_count)
- return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
+ return (u32 __iomem *)ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}

return event_regs[event_id].map_reg(stdev, off, index);
@@ -1057,11 +1057,11 @@ static int ioctl_event_ctl(struct switchtec_dev *stdev,
}

static int ioctl_pff_to_port(struct switchtec_dev *stdev,
- struct switchtec_ioctl_pff_port *up)
+ struct switchtec_ioctl_pff_port __user *up)
{
int i, part;
u32 reg;
- struct part_cfg_regs *pcfg;
+ struct part_cfg_regs __iomem *pcfg;
struct switchtec_ioctl_pff_port p;

if (copy_from_user(&p, up, sizeof(p)))
@@ -1104,10 +1104,10 @@ static int ioctl_pff_to_port(struct switchtec_dev *stdev,
}

static int ioctl_port_to_pff(struct switchtec_dev *stdev,
- struct switchtec_ioctl_pff_port *up)
+ struct switchtec_ioctl_pff_port __user *up)
{
struct switchtec_ioctl_pff_port p;
- struct part_cfg_regs *pcfg;
+ struct part_cfg_regs __iomem *pcfg;

if (copy_from_user(&p, up, sizeof(p)))
return -EFAULT;

base-commit: 92ed301919932f777713b9172e525674157e983d
--
2.20.1


2020-07-29 19:36:18

by Bjorn Helgaas

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] PCI/switechtec: Add missing __iomem and __user tags to fix sparse warnings

On Tue, Jul 28, 2020 at 01:24:33PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> Fix a number of missing __iomem and __user tags in the ioctl functions of
> the switchtec driver. This fixes a number of sparse warnings of the form:
>
> sparse: sparse: incorrect type in ... (different address spaces)
>
> Fixes: 52eabba5bcdb ("switchtec: Add IOCTLs to the Switchtec driver")
> Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe <[email protected]>

Applied to pci/switchtec for v5.9, thanks!

> ---
>
> Here are a couple quick patches to fix some sparse warnings I was
> notified about a couple weeks ago.
>
> I've split them into two patches based on Fixes tag, but they could be
> squashed depending on the preference.
>
> Thanks!
>
> drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c b/drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c
> index 850cfeb74608..3d5da7f44378 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/switch/switchtec.c
> @@ -940,7 +940,7 @@ static u32 __iomem *event_hdr_addr(struct switchtec_dev *stdev,
> size_t off;
>
> if (event_id < 0 || event_id >= SWITCHTEC_IOCTL_MAX_EVENTS)
> - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + return (u32 __iomem *)ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> off = event_regs[event_id].offset;
>
> @@ -948,10 +948,10 @@ static u32 __iomem *event_hdr_addr(struct switchtec_dev *stdev,
> if (index == SWITCHTEC_IOCTL_EVENT_LOCAL_PART_IDX)
> index = stdev->partition;
> else if (index < 0 || index >= stdev->partition_count)
> - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + return (u32 __iomem *)ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> } else if (event_regs[event_id].map_reg == pff_ev_reg) {
> if (index < 0 || index >= stdev->pff_csr_count)
> - return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> + return (u32 __iomem *)ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
>
> return event_regs[event_id].map_reg(stdev, off, index);
> @@ -1057,11 +1057,11 @@ static int ioctl_event_ctl(struct switchtec_dev *stdev,
> }
>
> static int ioctl_pff_to_port(struct switchtec_dev *stdev,
> - struct switchtec_ioctl_pff_port *up)
> + struct switchtec_ioctl_pff_port __user *up)
> {
> int i, part;
> u32 reg;
> - struct part_cfg_regs *pcfg;
> + struct part_cfg_regs __iomem *pcfg;
> struct switchtec_ioctl_pff_port p;
>
> if (copy_from_user(&p, up, sizeof(p)))
> @@ -1104,10 +1104,10 @@ static int ioctl_pff_to_port(struct switchtec_dev *stdev,
> }
>
> static int ioctl_port_to_pff(struct switchtec_dev *stdev,
> - struct switchtec_ioctl_pff_port *up)
> + struct switchtec_ioctl_pff_port __user *up)
> {
> struct switchtec_ioctl_pff_port p;
> - struct part_cfg_regs *pcfg;
> + struct part_cfg_regs __iomem *pcfg;
>
> if (copy_from_user(&p, up, sizeof(p)))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> base-commit: 92ed301919932f777713b9172e525674157e983d
> --
> 2.20.1