2020-09-17 14:25:51

by Masanari Iida

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH linux-next] docs:dev-tools: Fix typo in Documentation/dev-tools

This patch fixes some spelling typos found in
Documentation/dev-tools.

Signed-off-by: Masanari Iida <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst | 4 ++--
Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst | 2 +-
Documentation/dev-tools/kmemleak.rst | 2 +-
3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst
index c09c9ca2ff1c..49ec0ab6cfc7 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst
@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ using something like insmod or modprobe. The module is called ``test_kasan``.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~

With ``CONFIG_KUNIT`` built-in, ``CONFIG_KASAN_KUNIT_TEST`` can be built-in
-on any architecure that supports KASAN. These and any other KUnit
+on any architecture that supports KASAN. These and any other KUnit
tests enabled will run and print the results at boot as a late-init
call.

@@ -349,5 +349,5 @@ converted to KUnit. These tests can be run only as a module with
``CONFIG_KASAN`` built-in. The type of error expected and the
function being run is printed before the expression expected to give
an error. Then the error is printed, if found, and that test
-should be interpretted to pass only if the error was the one expected
+should be interpreted to pass only if the error was the one expected
by the test.
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst
index 8548b0b04e43..d2c4c27e1702 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ handles as they don't belong to a particular subsystem. The bytes 4-7 are
currently reserved and must be zero. In the future the number of bytes
used for the subsystem or handle ids might be increased.

-When a particular userspace proccess collects coverage via a common
+When a particular userspace process collects coverage via a common
handle, kcov will collect coverage for each code section that is annotated
to use the common handle obtained as kcov_handle from the current
task_struct. However non common handles allow to collect coverage
diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kmemleak.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kmemleak.rst
index a41a2d238af2..1c935f41cd3a 100644
--- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kmemleak.rst
+++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kmemleak.rst
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ Testing with kmemleak-test

To check if you have all set up to use kmemleak, you can use the kmemleak-test
module, a module that deliberately leaks memory. Set CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_TEST
-as module (it can't be used as bult-in) and boot the kernel with kmemleak
+as module (it can't be used as built-in) and boot the kernel with kmemleak
enabled. Load the module and perform a scan with::

# modprobe kmemleak-test
--
2.28.0.497.g54e85e7af1ac


2020-09-17 15:36:36

by Randy Dunlap

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] docs:dev-tools: Fix typo in Documentation/dev-tools

On 9/17/20 6:44 AM, Masanari Iida wrote:
> This patch fixes some spelling typos found in
> Documentation/dev-tools.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masanari Iida <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst | 4 ++--
> Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst | 2 +-
> Documentation/dev-tools/kmemleak.rst | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>

Thanks.

--
~Randy

2020-09-18 11:45:38

by Andrey Konovalov

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] docs:dev-tools: Fix typo in Documentation/dev-tools

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 3:44 PM Masanari Iida <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> This patch fixes some spelling typos found in
> Documentation/dev-tools.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masanari Iida <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst | 4 ++--
> Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst | 2 +-
> Documentation/dev-tools/kmemleak.rst | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst
> index c09c9ca2ff1c..49ec0ab6cfc7 100644
> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst
> @@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ using something like insmod or modprobe. The module is called ``test_kasan``.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> With ``CONFIG_KUNIT`` built-in, ``CONFIG_KASAN_KUNIT_TEST`` can be built-in
> -on any architecure that supports KASAN. These and any other KUnit
> +on any architecture that supports KASAN. These and any other KUnit
> tests enabled will run and print the results at boot as a late-init
> call.
>
> @@ -349,5 +349,5 @@ converted to KUnit. These tests can be run only as a module with
> ``CONFIG_KASAN`` built-in. The type of error expected and the
> function being run is printed before the expression expected to give
> an error. Then the error is printed, if found, and that test
> -should be interpretted to pass only if the error was the one expected
> +should be interpreted to pass only if the error was the one expected
> by the test.
> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst
> index 8548b0b04e43..d2c4c27e1702 100644
> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst
> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ handles as they don't belong to a particular subsystem. The bytes 4-7 are
> currently reserved and must be zero. In the future the number of bytes
> used for the subsystem or handle ids might be increased.
>
> -When a particular userspace proccess collects coverage via a common
> +When a particular userspace process collects coverage via a common
> handle, kcov will collect coverage for each code section that is annotated
> to use the common handle obtained as kcov_handle from the current
> task_struct. However non common handles allow to collect coverage
> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kmemleak.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kmemleak.rst
> index a41a2d238af2..1c935f41cd3a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kmemleak.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kmemleak.rst
> @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ Testing with kmemleak-test
>
> To check if you have all set up to use kmemleak, you can use the kmemleak-test
> module, a module that deliberately leaks memory. Set CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_TEST
> -as module (it can't be used as bult-in) and boot the kernel with kmemleak
> +as module (it can't be used as built-in) and boot the kernel with kmemleak
> enabled. Load the module and perform a scan with::
>
> # modprobe kmemleak-test

Reviewed-by: Andrey Konovalov <[email protected]>