2020-09-18 20:24:19

by Atish Patra

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [RFT PATCH v3 2/5] arm64, numa: Change the numa init functions name to be generic

As we are using generic numa implementation code, modify the acpi & numa
init functions name to indicate that generic implementation.

Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 13 -------------
arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 4 ++--
drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
include/asm-generic/numa.h | 4 ++--
4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
index 7ff800045434..96502ff92af5 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
@@ -117,16 +117,3 @@ void __init acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa)

node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed);
}
-
-int __init arm64_acpi_numa_init(void)
-{
- int ret;
-
- ret = acpi_numa_init();
- if (ret) {
- pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
- return ret;
- }
-
- return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
-}
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
index 481d22c32a2e..93b660229e1d 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
@@ -418,10 +418,10 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void)
max_pfn = max_low_pfn = max;
min_low_pfn = min;

- arm64_numa_init();
+ arch_numa_init();

/*
- * must be done after arm64_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
+ * must be done after arch_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
* initialize node_online_map that gets used in hugetlb_cma_reserve()
* while allocating required CMA size across online nodes.
*/
diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
index 73f8b49d485c..1649c90a3bc5 100644
--- a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
+++ b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
@@ -13,7 +13,9 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/of.h>

-#include <asm/acpi.h>
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
+#endif
#include <asm/sections.h>

struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly;
@@ -444,16 +446,37 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
return 0;
}

+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
+static int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
+{
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = acpi_numa_init();
+ if (ret) {
+ pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
+}
+#else
+static int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
+{
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+
+#endif
+
/**
- * arm64_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
+ * arch_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
*
* Try each configured NUMA initialization method until one succeeds. The
* last fallback is dummy single node config encomapssing whole memory.
*/
-void __init arm64_numa_init(void)
+void __init arch_numa_init(void)
{
if (!numa_off) {
- if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arm64_acpi_numa_init))
+ if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arch_acpi_numa_init))
return;
if (acpi_disabled && !numa_init(of_numa_init))
return;
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/numa.h b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
index 2718d5a6ff03..e7962db4ba44 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/numa.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
}
#endif

-void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
+void __init arch_numa_init(void);
int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
void __init numa_free_distance(void);
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { }
static inline void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
static inline void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
-static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { }
+static inline void arch_numa_init(void) { }
static inline void early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { }

#endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
--
2.25.1


2020-09-21 09:06:43

by Jonathan Cameron

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v3 2/5] arm64, numa: Change the numa init functions name to be generic

On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:11:37 -0700
Atish Patra <[email protected]> wrote:

> As we are using generic numa implementation code, modify the acpi & numa
> init functions name to indicate that generic implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <[email protected]>

Other than the double include of linux/acpi.h below this looks good to me.

Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>

> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 13 -------------
> arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> include/asm-generic/numa.h | 4 ++--
> 4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> index 7ff800045434..96502ff92af5 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> @@ -117,16 +117,3 @@ void __init acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa)
>
> node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed);
> }
> -
> -int __init arm64_acpi_numa_init(void)
> -{
> - int ret;
> -
> - ret = acpi_numa_init();
> - if (ret) {
> - pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
> - return ret;
> - }
> -
> - return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
> -}
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> index 481d22c32a2e..93b660229e1d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> @@ -418,10 +418,10 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void)
> max_pfn = max_low_pfn = max;
> min_low_pfn = min;
>
> - arm64_numa_init();
> + arch_numa_init();
>
> /*
> - * must be done after arm64_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
> + * must be done after arch_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
> * initialize node_online_map that gets used in hugetlb_cma_reserve()
> * while allocating required CMA size across online nodes.
> */
> diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> index 73f8b49d485c..1649c90a3bc5 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> @@ -13,7 +13,9 @@
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
>
> -#include <asm/acpi.h>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#endif

Why do we need this ifdef stuff here?
In particular acpi_disabled is defined in that header
in the !CONFIG_ACPI case so seems like we should include it always.

Also given we've just moved arch/arm64/numa.c to become this file,
it has an include of that header a few lines off the top of this diff anyway.

So I think you can just drop the additional include here.


> #include <asm/sections.h>
>
> struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly;
> @@ -444,16 +446,37 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> +static int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = acpi_numa_init();
> + if (ret) {
> + pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
> +}
> +#else
> +static int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
> +{
> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +}
> +
> +#endif
> +
> /**
> - * arm64_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
> + * arch_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
> *
> * Try each configured NUMA initialization method until one succeeds. The
> * last fallback is dummy single node config encomapssing whole memory.
> */
> -void __init arm64_numa_init(void)
> +void __init arch_numa_init(void)
> {
> if (!numa_off) {
> - if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arm64_acpi_numa_init))
> + if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arch_acpi_numa_init))
> return;
> if (acpi_disabled && !numa_init(of_numa_init))
> return;
> diff --git a/include/asm-generic/numa.h b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> index 2718d5a6ff03..e7962db4ba44 100644
> --- a/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> +++ b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
> }
> #endif
>
> -void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
> +void __init arch_numa_init(void);
> int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
> void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
> void __init numa_free_distance(void);
> @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { }
> static inline void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> static inline void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> -static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { }
> +static inline void arch_numa_init(void) { }
> static inline void early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { }
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */


2020-09-22 00:59:24

by Atish Patra

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v3 2/5] arm64, numa: Change the numa init functions name to be generic

On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 2:03 AM Jonathan Cameron
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:11:37 -0700
> Atish Patra <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > As we are using generic numa implementation code, modify the acpi & numa
> > init functions name to indicate that generic implementation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <[email protected]>
>
> Other than the double include of linux/acpi.h below this looks good to me.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <[email protected]>
>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c | 13 -------------
> > arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 4 ++--
> > drivers/base/arch_numa.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > include/asm-generic/numa.h | 4 ++--
> > 4 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> > index 7ff800045434..96502ff92af5 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi_numa.c
> > @@ -117,16 +117,3 @@ void __init acpi_numa_gicc_affinity_init(struct acpi_srat_gicc_affinity *pa)
> >
> > node_set(node, numa_nodes_parsed);
> > }
> > -
> > -int __init arm64_acpi_numa_init(void)
> > -{
> > - int ret;
> > -
> > - ret = acpi_numa_init();
> > - if (ret) {
> > - pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
> > - return ret;
> > - }
> > -
> > - return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
> > -}
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > index 481d22c32a2e..93b660229e1d 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > @@ -418,10 +418,10 @@ void __init bootmem_init(void)
> > max_pfn = max_low_pfn = max;
> > min_low_pfn = min;
> >
> > - arm64_numa_init();
> > + arch_numa_init();
> >
> > /*
> > - * must be done after arm64_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
> > + * must be done after arch_numa_init() which calls numa_init() to
> > * initialize node_online_map that gets used in hugetlb_cma_reserve()
> > * while allocating required CMA size across online nodes.
> > */
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> > index 73f8b49d485c..1649c90a3bc5 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/arch_numa.c
> > @@ -13,7 +13,9 @@
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > #include <linux/of.h>
> >
> > -#include <asm/acpi.h>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> > +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> > +#endif
>
> Why do we need this ifdef stuff here?
> In particular acpi_disabled is defined in that header
> in the !CONFIG_ACPI case so seems like we should include it always.
>
> Also given we've just moved arch/arm64/numa.c to become this file,
> it has an include of that header a few lines off the top of this diff anyway.
>
> So I think you can just drop the additional include here.
>

Ahh Yes. Sorry for the oversight. Fixed it.

>
> > #include <asm/sections.h>
> >
> > struct pglist_data *node_data[MAX_NUMNODES] __read_mostly;
> > @@ -444,16 +446,37 @@ static int __init dummy_numa_init(void)
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_NUMA
> > +static int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = acpi_numa_init();
> > + if (ret) {
> > + pr_info("Failed to initialise from firmware\n");
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return srat_disabled() ? -EINVAL : 0;
> > +}
> > +#else
> > +static int __init arch_acpi_numa_init(void)
> > +{
> > + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > +}
> > +
> > +#endif
> > +
> > /**
> > - * arm64_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
> > + * arch_numa_init() - Initialize NUMA
> > *
> > * Try each configured NUMA initialization method until one succeeds. The
> > * last fallback is dummy single node config encomapssing whole memory.
> > */
> > -void __init arm64_numa_init(void)
> > +void __init arch_numa_init(void)
> > {
> > if (!numa_off) {
> > - if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arm64_acpi_numa_init))
> > + if (!acpi_disabled && !numa_init(arch_acpi_numa_init))
> > return;
> > if (acpi_disabled && !numa_init(of_numa_init))
> > return;
> > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/numa.h b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> > index 2718d5a6ff03..e7962db4ba44 100644
> > --- a/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> > +++ b/include/asm-generic/numa.h
> > @@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ static inline const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node)
> > }
> > #endif
> >
> > -void __init arm64_numa_init(void);
> > +void __init arch_numa_init(void);
> > int __init numa_add_memblk(int nodeid, u64 start, u64 end);
> > void __init numa_set_distance(int from, int to, int distance);
> > void __init numa_free_distance(void);
> > @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu);
> > static inline void numa_store_cpu_info(unsigned int cpu) { }
> > static inline void numa_add_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> > static inline void numa_remove_cpu(unsigned int cpu) { }
> > -static inline void arm64_numa_init(void) { }
> > +static inline void arch_numa_init(void) { }
> > static inline void early_map_cpu_to_node(unsigned int cpu, int nid) { }
> >
> > #endif /* CONFIG_NUMA */
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv



--
Regards,
Atish