2020-10-11 02:49:27

by Evan Green

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-mux-gpio: Enable this driver in ACPI land

Enable i2c-mux-gpio devices to be defined via ACPI. The idle-state
property translates directly to a fwnode_property_*() call. The child
reg property translates naturally into _ADR in ACPI.

The i2c-parent is a little trickier, since of's phandle definition
suggests the i2c mux could live in a completely different part of
the tree than its upstream i2c controller. For now in ACPI,
just assume that the i2c-mux-gpio device will always be a direct
child of the i2c controller. If the additional flexibility of
defining muxes in wildly different locations from their parent
controllers is required, it can be added later.

Signed-off-by: Evan Green <[email protected]>
---

drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
index 4effe563e9e8d..f195e95e8a037 100644
--- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
@@ -49,34 +49,46 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_deselect(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc, u32 chan)
return 0;
}

-#ifdef CONFIG_OF
-static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe_dt(struct gpiomux *mux,
- struct platform_device *pdev)
+static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe_fw(struct gpiomux *mux,
+ struct platform_device *pdev)
{
- struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
- struct device_node *adapter_np, *child;
- struct i2c_adapter *adapter;
+ struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
+ struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
+ acpi_handle dev_handle;
+ struct device_node *adapter_np;
+ struct i2c_adapter *adapter = NULL;
+ struct fwnode_handle *child = NULL;
unsigned *values;
int i = 0;

- if (!np)
- return -ENODEV;
+ if (is_of_node(dev->fwnode)) {
+ if (!np)
+ return -ENODEV;

- adapter_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "i2c-parent", 0);
- if (!adapter_np) {
- dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot parse i2c-parent\n");
- return -ENODEV;
+ adapter_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "i2c-parent", 0);
+ if (!adapter_np) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot parse i2c-parent\n");
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+ adapter = of_find_i2c_adapter_by_node(adapter_np);
+ of_node_put(adapter_np);
+
+ } else if (is_acpi_node(dev->fwnode)) {
+ /*
+ * In ACPI land the mux should be a direct child of the i2c
+ * bus it muxes.
+ */
+ dev_handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev->parent);
+ adapter = i2c_acpi_find_adapter_by_handle(dev_handle);
}
- adapter = of_find_i2c_adapter_by_node(adapter_np);
- of_node_put(adapter_np);
+
if (!adapter)
return -EPROBE_DEFER;

mux->data.parent = i2c_adapter_id(adapter);
put_device(&adapter->dev);

- mux->data.n_values = of_get_child_count(np);
-
+ mux->data.n_values = device_get_child_node_count(dev);
values = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev,
mux->data.n_values, sizeof(*mux->data.values),
GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -85,24 +97,35 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe_dt(struct gpiomux *mux,
return -ENOMEM;
}

- for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
- of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", values + i);
+ device_for_each_child_node(dev, child) {
+ if (is_of_node(child)) {
+ fwnode_property_read_u32(child, "reg", values + i);
+
+ } else if (is_acpi_node(child)) {
+ unsigned long long adr;
+ acpi_status status;
+
+ status = acpi_evaluate_integer(ACPI_HANDLE_FWNODE(child),
+ METHOD_NAME__ADR,
+ NULL, &adr);
+ if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
+ *(values + i) = adr;
+
+ } else {
+ dev_err(dev, "Cannot get address");
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ }
+
i++;
}
mux->data.values = values;

- if (of_property_read_u32(np, "idle-state", &mux->data.idle))
+ if (fwnode_property_read_u32(dev->fwnode, "idle-state", &mux->data.idle))
mux->data.idle = I2C_MUX_GPIO_NO_IDLE;

return 0;
}
-#else
-static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe_dt(struct gpiomux *mux,
- struct platform_device *pdev)
-{
- return 0;
-}
-#endif

static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
@@ -118,7 +141,7 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
return -ENOMEM;

if (!dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev)) {
- ret = i2c_mux_gpio_probe_dt(mux, pdev);
+ ret = i2c_mux_gpio_probe_fw(mux, pdev);
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
} else {
--
2.26.2


2020-10-11 02:51:10

by Randy Dunlap

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c: i2c-mux-gpio: Enable this driver in ACPI land

On 10/9/20 3:43 PM, Evan Green wrote:
> Enable i2c-mux-gpio devices to be defined via ACPI. The idle-state
> property translates directly to a fwnode_property_*() call. The child
> reg property translates naturally into _ADR in ACPI.
>
> The i2c-parent is a little trickier, since of's phandle definition
> suggests the i2c mux could live in a completely different part of
> the tree than its upstream i2c controller. For now in ACPI,
> just assume that the i2c-mux-gpio device will always be a direct
> child of the i2c controller. If the additional flexibility of
> defining muxes in wildly different locations from their parent
> controllers is required, it can be added later.
>
> Signed-off-by: Evan Green <[email protected]>
> ---
>
> drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
> index 4effe563e9e8d..f195e95e8a037 100644
> --- a/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
> +++ b/drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c
> @@ -49,34 +49,46 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_deselect(struct i2c_mux_core *muxc, u32 chan)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_OF
> -static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe_dt(struct gpiomux *mux,
> - struct platform_device *pdev)
> +static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe_fw(struct gpiomux *mux,
> + struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
> - struct device_node *adapter_np, *child;
> - struct i2c_adapter *adapter;
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
> + acpi_handle dev_handle;
> + struct device_node *adapter_np;
> + struct i2c_adapter *adapter = NULL;
> + struct fwnode_handle *child = NULL;
> unsigned *values;
> int i = 0;
>
> - if (!np)
> - return -ENODEV;
> + if (is_of_node(dev->fwnode)) {
> + if (!np)
> + return -ENODEV;
>
> - adapter_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "i2c-parent", 0);
> - if (!adapter_np) {
> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot parse i2c-parent\n");
> - return -ENODEV;
> + adapter_np = of_parse_phandle(np, "i2c-parent", 0);
> + if (!adapter_np) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Cannot parse i2c-parent\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> + adapter = of_find_i2c_adapter_by_node(adapter_np);
> + of_node_put(adapter_np);
> +
> + } else if (is_acpi_node(dev->fwnode)) {
> + /*
> + * In ACPI land the mux should be a direct child of the i2c
> + * bus it muxes.
> + */
> + dev_handle = ACPI_HANDLE(dev->parent);
> + adapter = i2c_acpi_find_adapter_by_handle(dev_handle);
> }
> - adapter = of_find_i2c_adapter_by_node(adapter_np);
> - of_node_put(adapter_np);
> +
> if (!adapter)
> return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>
> mux->data.parent = i2c_adapter_id(adapter);
> put_device(&adapter->dev);
>
> - mux->data.n_values = of_get_child_count(np);
> -
> + mux->data.n_values = device_get_child_node_count(dev);
> values = devm_kcalloc(&pdev->dev,
> mux->data.n_values, sizeof(*mux->data.values),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -85,24 +97,35 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe_dt(struct gpiomux *mux,
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> - for_each_child_of_node(np, child) {
> - of_property_read_u32(child, "reg", values + i);
> + device_for_each_child_node(dev, child) {
> + if (is_of_node(child)) {
> + fwnode_property_read_u32(child, "reg", values + i);
> +
> + } else if (is_acpi_node(child)) {
> + unsigned long long adr;
> + acpi_status status;
> +
> + status = acpi_evaluate_integer(ACPI_HANDLE_FWNODE(child),
> + METHOD_NAME__ADR,
> + NULL, &adr);
> + if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
> + *(values + i) = adr;
> +
> + } else {
> + dev_err(dev, "Cannot get address");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + }
> +
> i++;
> }
> mux->data.values = values;
>
> - if (of_property_read_u32(np, "idle-state", &mux->data.idle))
> + if (fwnode_property_read_u32(dev->fwnode, "idle-state", &mux->data.idle))
> mux->data.idle = I2C_MUX_GPIO_NO_IDLE;
>
> return 0;
> }
> -#else
> -static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe_dt(struct gpiomux *mux,
> - struct platform_device *pdev)
> -{
> - return 0;
> -}
> -#endif
>
> static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> @@ -118,7 +141,7 @@ static int i2c_mux_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
> if (!dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev)) {
> - ret = i2c_mux_gpio_probe_dt(mux, pdev);
> + ret = i2c_mux_gpio_probe_fw(mux, pdev);
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> } else {
>

Hi,


When CONFIG_ACPI is not enabled:

../drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c: In function ‘i2c_mux_gpio_probe_fw’:
../drivers/i2c/muxes/i2c-mux-gpio.c:108:13: error: implicit declaration of function ‘acpi_evaluate_integer’; did you mean ‘acpi_evaluate_object’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
status = acpi_evaluate_integer(ACPI_HANDLE_FWNODE(child),


--
~Randy
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>