2020-10-16 21:48:59

by Vaishnav M A

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] iio: light: vcnl4035 add i2c_device_id


This patch aims to add i2c_device_id for the
vcnl4035 driver, while going through the initial driver
submission patches, noticed that the i2c_device_id was removed
on suggestion (https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/970970/),
will it be possible to consider this patch add the i2c_device_id,
so that the device can be instantiated using i2c_new_client_device
or say from the userspace?.This will be really helpful in cases
where the device tree based description is not possible now(Eg.
a device on a gbphy i2c adapter created by greybus).

The particular usecase here is described over this RFC Patch
for the mikroBUS driver:
https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1290148/

Thanks and Regards,

Vaishnav M A

Signed-off-by: Vaishnav M A <[email protected]>
---
drivers/iio/light/vcnl4035.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/vcnl4035.c b/drivers/iio/light/vcnl4035.c
index 765c44adac57..73a28e30dddc 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/light/vcnl4035.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/light/vcnl4035.c
@@ -652,6 +652,12 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops vcnl4035_pm_ops = {
vcnl4035_runtime_resume, NULL)
};

+static const struct i2c_device_id vcnl4035_id[] = {
+ { "vcnl4035", 0},
+ { }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, vcnl4035_id);
+
static const struct of_device_id vcnl4035_of_match[] = {
{ .compatible = "vishay,vcnl4035", },
{ }
@@ -666,6 +672,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver vcnl4035_driver = {
},
.probe = vcnl4035_probe,
.remove = vcnl4035_remove,
+ .id_table = vcnl4035_id,
};

module_i2c_driver(vcnl4035_driver);
--
2.25.1


2020-10-18 12:55:50

by Jonathan Cameron

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: light: vcnl4035 add i2c_device_id

On Sat, 17 Oct 2020 00:14:59 +0530
Vaishnav M A <[email protected]> wrote:

> This patch aims to add i2c_device_id for the
> vcnl4035 driver, while going through the initial driver
> submission patches, noticed that the i2c_device_id was removed
> on suggestion (https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/970970/),
> will it be possible to consider this patch add the i2c_device_id,
> so that the device can be instantiated using i2c_new_client_device
> or say from the userspace?.This will be really helpful in cases
> where the device tree based description is not possible now(Eg.
> a device on a gbphy i2c adapter created by greybus).
>
> The particular usecase here is described over this RFC Patch
> for the mikroBUS driver:
> https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1290148/
>
> Thanks and Regards,
>
> Vaishnav M A
If you send out a v2 of a patch without there having been any replies
please reply your self to say you have done so.

That avoids reviewers looking at the wrong version!

Thanks

Jonathan



>
> Signed-off-by: Vaishnav M A <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/iio/light/vcnl4035.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/light/vcnl4035.c b/drivers/iio/light/vcnl4035.c
> index 765c44adac57..73a28e30dddc 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/light/vcnl4035.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/light/vcnl4035.c
> @@ -652,6 +652,12 @@ static const struct dev_pm_ops vcnl4035_pm_ops = {
> vcnl4035_runtime_resume, NULL)
> };
>
> +static const struct i2c_device_id vcnl4035_id[] = {
> + { "vcnl4035", 0},
> + { }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, vcnl4035_id);
> +
> static const struct of_device_id vcnl4035_of_match[] = {
> { .compatible = "vishay,vcnl4035", },
> { }
> @@ -666,6 +672,7 @@ static struct i2c_driver vcnl4035_driver = {
> },
> .probe = vcnl4035_probe,
> .remove = vcnl4035_remove,
> + .id_table = vcnl4035_id,
> };
>
> module_i2c_driver(vcnl4035_driver);