2020-11-04 13:46:22

by Dmitry Osipenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v3] mfd: tps65910: Correct power-off programming sequence

This patch fixes system shutdown on a devices that use TPS65910 as a
system's power controller. In accordance to the TPS65910 datasheet, the
PMIC's state-machine transitions into the OFF state only when DEV_OFF
bit of DEVCTRL_REG is set. The ON / SLEEP states also should be cleared,
otherwise PMIC won't get into a proper state on shutdown. Devices like
Nexus 7 tablet and Ouya game console are now shutting down properly.

Tested-by: Peter Geis <[email protected]>
Tested-by: Zack Pearsall <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <[email protected]>
---

Changelog:

v3: - Removed the DEV_SLP_MASK clearing and adding clarifying comment to
the code about why clearing PWR_OFF bit needs to be done, which was
suggested by Michał Mirosław in a review comment to v2.

- Added tested-by from Peter Geis who tested v3 on his Ouya game
console.

v2: - Now using a single tps65910_reg_update_bits() instead of set+clear.
Thanks to Michał Mirosław for the suggestion.

drivers/mfd/tps65910.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c b/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
index 11959021b50a..388214241558 100644
--- a/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
+++ b/drivers/mfd/tps65910.c
@@ -436,12 +436,18 @@ static void tps65910_power_off(void)

tps65910 = dev_get_drvdata(&tps65910_i2c_client->dev);

+ /*
+ * Note that the PWR_OFF bit needs to be set separately, before
+ * transitioning to the OFF state. It enables the "sequential"
+ * power-off mode on TPS65911, it's a NO-OP on TPS65910.
+ */
if (tps65910_reg_set_bits(tps65910, TPS65910_DEVCTRL,
DEVCTRL_PWR_OFF_MASK) < 0)
return;

- tps65910_reg_clear_bits(tps65910, TPS65910_DEVCTRL,
- DEVCTRL_DEV_ON_MASK);
+ tps65910_reg_update_bits(tps65910, TPS65910_DEVCTRL,
+ DEVCTRL_DEV_OFF_MASK | DEVCTRL_DEV_ON_MASK,
+ DEVCTRL_DEV_OFF_MASK);
}

static int tps65910_i2c_probe(struct i2c_client *i2c,
--
2.27.0


2020-11-05 04:39:09

by Michał Mirosław

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mfd: tps65910: Correct power-off programming sequence

On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 04:44:08PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> This patch fixes system shutdown on a devices that use TPS65910 as a
> system's power controller. In accordance to the TPS65910 datasheet, the
> PMIC's state-machine transitions into the OFF state only when DEV_OFF
> bit of DEVCTRL_REG is set. The ON / SLEEP states also should be cleared,
> otherwise PMIC won't get into a proper state on shutdown. Devices like
> Nexus 7 tablet and Ouya game console are now shutting down properly.
[...]

You might want to rebase on https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/9/26/397 as it's
probably going to be accepted shortly. This just means replacing
register accesses: tps65910_reg_*() -> regmap_*().

Best Regards,
Micha? Miros?aw

2020-11-05 14:00:18

by Dmitry Osipenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] mfd: tps65910: Correct power-off programming sequence

05.11.2020 04:33, Michał Mirosław пишет:
> On Wed, Nov 04, 2020 at 04:44:08PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
>> This patch fixes system shutdown on a devices that use TPS65910 as a
>> system's power controller. In accordance to the TPS65910 datasheet, the
>> PMIC's state-machine transitions into the OFF state only when DEV_OFF
>> bit of DEVCTRL_REG is set. The ON / SLEEP states also should be cleared,
>> otherwise PMIC won't get into a proper state on shutdown. Devices like
>> Nexus 7 tablet and Ouya game console are now shutting down properly.
> [...]
>
> You might want to rebase on https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/9/26/397 as it's
> probably going to be accepted shortly. This just means replacing
> register accesses: tps65910_reg_*() -> regmap_*().

I'll update this patch once yours series will hit linux-next, thanks!