2020-11-19 23:27:23

by Chun-Kuang Hu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: dsi: Modify horizontal front/back porch byte formula

From: CK Hu <[email protected]>

In the patch to be fixed, horizontal_backporch_byte become to large
for some panel, so roll back that patch. For small hfp or hbp panel,
using vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch to calculate
horizontal_backporch_byte would make it negtive, so
use horizontal_backporch_byte itself to make it positive.

Fixes: 35bf948f1edb ("drm/mediatek: dsi: Fix scrolling of panel with small hfp or hbp")

Signed-off-by: CK Hu <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <[email protected]>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 61 +++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
index 4a188a942c38..65fd99c528af 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
@@ -444,7 +444,10 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
u32 horizontal_sync_active_byte;
u32 horizontal_backporch_byte;
u32 horizontal_frontporch_byte;
+ u32 horizontal_front_back_byte;
+ u32 data_phy_cycles_byte;
u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp, data_phy_cycles;
+ u32 delta;
struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = &dsi->phy_timing;

struct videomode *vm = &dsi->vm;
@@ -466,50 +469,30 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
horizontal_sync_active_byte = (vm->hsync_len * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10);

if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_SYNC_PULSE)
- horizontal_backporch_byte = vm->hback_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
+ horizontal_backporch_byte = vm->hback_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10;
else
horizontal_backporch_byte = (vm->hback_porch + vm->hsync_len) *
- dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
+ dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10;

data_phy_cycles = timing->lpx + timing->da_hs_prepare +
- timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit;
-
- if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) {
- if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
- data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) {
- horizontal_frontporch_byte =
- vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
- (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) *
- vm->hfront_porch /
- (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
-
- horizontal_backporch_byte =
- horizontal_backporch_byte -
- (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) *
- vm->hback_porch /
- (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
- } else {
- DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
- horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
- dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
- }
+ timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit + 3;
+
+ delta = dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST ? 18 : 12;
+
+ horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
+ horizontal_front_back_byte = horizontal_frontporch_byte + horizontal_backporch_byte;
+ data_phy_cycles_byte = data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + delta;
+
+ if (horizontal_front_back_byte > data_phy_cycles_byte) {
+ horizontal_frontporch_byte -= data_phy_cycles_byte *
+ horizontal_frontporch_byte /
+ horizontal_front_back_byte;
+
+ horizontal_backporch_byte -= data_phy_cycles_byte *
+ horizontal_backporch_byte /
+ horizontal_front_back_byte;
} else {
- if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
- data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) {
- horizontal_frontporch_byte =
- vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
- (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) *
- vm->hfront_porch /
- (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
- horizontal_backporch_byte = horizontal_backporch_byte -
- (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) *
- vm->hback_porch /
- (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
- } else {
- DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
- horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
- dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
- }
+ DRM_WARN("HFP + HBP less than d-phy, FPS will under 60Hz\n");
}

writel(horizontal_sync_active_byte, dsi->regs + DSI_HSA_WC);
--
2.17.1


2020-11-20 00:31:59

by Bilal Wasim

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: dsi: Modify horizontal front/back porch byte formula

Hi CK,

On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 07:23:35 +0800
Chun-Kuang Hu <[email protected]> wrote:

> From: CK Hu <[email protected]>
>
> In the patch to be fixed, horizontal_backporch_byte become to large
> for some panel, so roll back that patch. For small hfp or hbp panel,
> using vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch to calculate
> horizontal_backporch_byte would make it negtive, so
> use horizontal_backporch_byte itself to make it positive.
>
> Fixes: 35bf948f1edb ("drm/mediatek: dsi: Fix scrolling of panel with
> small hfp or hbp")
>
> Signed-off-by: CK Hu <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 61
> +++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 39
> deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c index 4a188a942c38..65fd99c528af
> 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> @@ -444,7 +444,10 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct
> mtk_dsi *dsi) u32 horizontal_sync_active_byte;
> u32 horizontal_backporch_byte;
> u32 horizontal_frontporch_byte;
> + u32 horizontal_front_back_byte;
> + u32 data_phy_cycles_byte;
> u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp, data_phy_cycles;
> + u32 delta;
> struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = &dsi->phy_timing;
>
> struct videomode *vm = &dsi->vm;
> @@ -466,50 +469,30 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct
> mtk_dsi *dsi) horizontal_sync_active_byte = (vm->hsync_len *
> dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10);
> if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_SYNC_PULSE)
> - horizontal_backporch_byte = vm->hback_porch *
> dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> + horizontal_backporch_byte = vm->hback_porch *
> dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10; else
> horizontal_backporch_byte = (vm->hback_porch +
> vm->hsync_len) *
> - dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> + dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10;
>
> data_phy_cycles = timing->lpx + timing->da_hs_prepare +
> - timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit;
> -
> - if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) {
> - if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) *
> dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> - data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) {
> - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> - vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) *
> - vm->hfront_porch /
> - (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> -
> - horizontal_backporch_byte =
> - horizontal_backporch_byte -
> - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) *
> - vm->hback_porch /
> - (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> - } else {
> - DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will
> under 60Hz\n");
> - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> vm->hfront_porch *
> - dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> - }
> + timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit +
> 3; +
> + delta = dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST ? 18 :
> 12; +
> + horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> + horizontal_front_back_byte = horizontal_frontporch_byte +
> horizontal_backporch_byte;
> + data_phy_cycles_byte = data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + delta;
> +
> + if (horizontal_front_back_byte > data_phy_cycles_byte) {
> + horizontal_frontporch_byte -= data_phy_cycles_byte *
> +
> horizontal_frontporch_byte /
> +
> horizontal_front_back_byte; +
> + horizontal_backporch_byte -= data_phy_cycles_byte *
> +
> horizontal_backporch_byte /
> +
> horizontal_front_back_byte; } else {
> - if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) *
> dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> - data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) {
> - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> - vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) *
> - vm->hfront_porch /
> - (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> - horizontal_backporch_byte =
> horizontal_backporch_byte -
> - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) *
> - vm->hback_porch /
> - (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> - } else {
> - DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will
> under 60Hz\n");
> - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> vm->hfront_porch *
> - dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> - }
> + DRM_WARN("HFP + HBP less than d-phy, FPS will under
> 60Hz\n"); }
>
> writel(horizontal_sync_active_byte, dsi->regs + DSI_HSA_WC);

Tested on Chromebook ELM.

Tested-by: Bilal Wasim <[email protected]>

Thanks,
Bilal

2020-11-21 10:41:05

by Chun-Kuang Hu

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/mediatek: dsi: Modify horizontal front/back porch byte formula

Bilal Wasim <[email protected]> 於 2020年11月20日 週五 上午8:30寫道:
>
> Hi CK,
>
> On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 07:23:35 +0800
> Chun-Kuang Hu <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > From: CK Hu <[email protected]>
> >
> > In the patch to be fixed, horizontal_backporch_byte become to large
> > for some panel, so roll back that patch. For small hfp or hbp panel,
> > using vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch to calculate
> > horizontal_backporch_byte would make it negtive, so
> > use horizontal_backporch_byte itself to make it positive.

Applied to mediatek-drm-fixes [1].

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chunkuang.hu/linux.git/log/?h=mediatek-drm-fixes

> >
> > Fixes: 35bf948f1edb ("drm/mediatek: dsi: Fix scrolling of panel with
> > small hfp or hbp")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: CK Hu <[email protected]>
> > Signed-off-by: Chun-Kuang Hu <[email protected]>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 61
> > +++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 39
> > deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c index 4a188a942c38..65fd99c528af
> > 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> > @@ -444,7 +444,10 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct
> > mtk_dsi *dsi) u32 horizontal_sync_active_byte;
> > u32 horizontal_backporch_byte;
> > u32 horizontal_frontporch_byte;
> > + u32 horizontal_front_back_byte;
> > + u32 data_phy_cycles_byte;
> > u32 dsi_tmp_buf_bpp, data_phy_cycles;
> > + u32 delta;
> > struct mtk_phy_timing *timing = &dsi->phy_timing;
> >
> > struct videomode *vm = &dsi->vm;
> > @@ -466,50 +469,30 @@ static void mtk_dsi_config_vdo_timing(struct
> > mtk_dsi *dsi) horizontal_sync_active_byte = (vm->hsync_len *
> > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10);
> > if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_SYNC_PULSE)
> > - horizontal_backporch_byte = vm->hback_porch *
> > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> > + horizontal_backporch_byte = vm->hback_porch *
> > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10; else
> > horizontal_backporch_byte = (vm->hback_porch +
> > vm->hsync_len) *
> > - dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> > + dsi_tmp_buf_bpp - 10;
> >
> > data_phy_cycles = timing->lpx + timing->da_hs_prepare +
> > - timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit;
> > -
> > - if (dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST) {
> > - if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) *
> > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> > - data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) {
> > - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> > - vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> > - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) *
> > - vm->hfront_porch /
> > - (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> > -
> > - horizontal_backporch_byte =
> > - horizontal_backporch_byte -
> > - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 18) *
> > - vm->hback_porch /
> > - (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> > - } else {
> > - DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will
> > under 60Hz\n");
> > - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> > vm->hfront_porch *
> > - dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> > - }
> > + timing->da_hs_zero + timing->da_hs_exit +
> > 3; +
> > + delta = dsi->mode_flags & MIPI_DSI_MODE_VIDEO_BURST ? 18 :
> > 12; +
> > + horizontal_frontporch_byte = vm->hfront_porch *
> > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> > + horizontal_front_back_byte = horizontal_frontporch_byte +
> > horizontal_backporch_byte;
> > + data_phy_cycles_byte = data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + delta;
> > +
> > + if (horizontal_front_back_byte > data_phy_cycles_byte) {
> > + horizontal_frontporch_byte -= data_phy_cycles_byte *
> > +
> > horizontal_frontporch_byte /
> > +
> > horizontal_front_back_byte; +
> > + horizontal_backporch_byte -= data_phy_cycles_byte *
> > +
> > horizontal_backporch_byte /
> > +
> > horizontal_front_back_byte; } else {
> > - if ((vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch) *
> > dsi_tmp_buf_bpp >
> > - data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) {
> > - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> > - vm->hfront_porch * dsi_tmp_buf_bpp -
> > - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) *
> > - vm->hfront_porch /
> > - (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> > - horizontal_backporch_byte =
> > horizontal_backporch_byte -
> > - (data_phy_cycles * dsi->lanes + 12) *
> > - vm->hback_porch /
> > - (vm->hfront_porch + vm->hback_porch);
> > - } else {
> > - DRM_WARN("HFP less than d-phy, FPS will
> > under 60Hz\n");
> > - horizontal_frontporch_byte =
> > vm->hfront_porch *
> > - dsi_tmp_buf_bpp;
> > - }
> > + DRM_WARN("HFP + HBP less than d-phy, FPS will under
> > 60Hz\n"); }
> >
> > writel(horizontal_sync_active_byte, dsi->regs + DSI_HSA_WC);
>
> Tested on Chromebook ELM.
>
> Tested-by: Bilal Wasim <[email protected]>
>
> Thanks,
> Bilal