In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple
warnings by explicitly adding multiple break statements instead of just
letting the code fall through to the next case.
Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
---
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_dccp.c | 1 +
net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c | 1 +
net/netfilter/nft_ct.c | 1 +
3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_dccp.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_dccp.c
index b3f4a334f9d7..94001eb51ffe 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_dccp.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_dccp.c
@@ -397,6 +397,7 @@ dccp_new(struct nf_conn *ct, const struct sk_buff *skb,
msg = "not picking up existing connection ";
goto out_invalid;
}
+ break;
case CT_DCCP_REQUEST:
break;
case CT_DCCP_INVALID:
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
index 0f58e98542be..78d0bbc8868c 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c
@@ -8342,6 +8342,7 @@ static int nf_tables_check_loops(const struct nft_ctx *ctx,
data->verdict.chain);
if (err < 0)
return err;
+ break;
default:
break;
}
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nft_ct.c b/net/netfilter/nft_ct.c
index 322bd674963e..fec68b75f39a 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nft_ct.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nft_ct.c
@@ -530,6 +530,7 @@ static void __nft_ct_set_destroy(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_ct *priv)
case NFT_CT_ZONE:
if (--nft_ct_pcpu_template_refcnt == 0)
nft_ct_tmpl_put_pcpu();
+ break;
#endif
default:
break;
--
2.27.0
Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]> wrote:
> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple
> warnings by explicitly adding multiple break statements instead of just
> letting the code fall through to the next case.
Acked-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
Feel free to carry this in next iteration of series, if any.
On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 11:47:37PM +0100, Florian Westphal wrote:
> Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]> wrote:
> > In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple
> > warnings by explicitly adding multiple break statements instead of just
> > letting the code fall through to the next case.
>
> Acked-by: Florian Westphal <[email protected]>
>
> Feel free to carry this in next iteration of series, if any.
Thanks, Florian.
--
Gustavo