Fix to return -ENODEV error code when edac_pci_add_device() failed instaed
of 0 in mv64x60_pci_err_probe(), as done elsewhere in this function.
Fixes: 4f4aeeabc061 ("drivers-edac: add marvell mv64x60 driver")
Signed-off-by: Wang ShaoBo <[email protected]>
---
drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c b/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c
index 3c68bb525d5d..456b9ca1fe8d 100644
--- a/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c
@@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ static int mv64x60_pci_err_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (edac_pci_add_device(pci, pdata->edac_idx) > 0) {
edac_dbg(3, "failed edac_pci_add_device()\n");
+ res = -ENODEV;
goto err;
}
--
2.17.1
On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 02:30:09PM +0800, Wang ShaoBo wrote:
> Fix to return -ENODEV error code when edac_pci_add_device() failed instaed
> of 0 in mv64x60_pci_err_probe(), as done elsewhere in this function.
>
> Fixes: 4f4aeeabc061 ("drivers-edac: add marvell mv64x60 driver")
> Signed-off-by: Wang ShaoBo <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c b/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c
> index 3c68bb525d5d..456b9ca1fe8d 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c
> +++ b/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c
> @@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ static int mv64x60_pci_err_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> if (edac_pci_add_device(pci, pdata->edac_idx) > 0) {
> edac_dbg(3, "failed edac_pci_add_device()\n");
> + res = -ENODEV;
> goto err;
> }
That driver depends on MV64X60 and I don't see anything in the tree
enabling it and I can't select it AFAICT:
config MV64X60
bool
select PPC_INDIRECT_PCI
select CHECK_CACHE_COHERENCY
PPC folks, what do we do here?
If not used anymore, I'd love to have one less EDAC driver.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Borislav Petkov <[email protected]> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2020 at 02:30:09PM +0800, Wang ShaoBo wrote:
>> Fix to return -ENODEV error code when edac_pci_add_device() failed instaed
>> of 0 in mv64x60_pci_err_probe(), as done elsewhere in this function.
>>
>> Fixes: 4f4aeeabc061 ("drivers-edac: add marvell mv64x60 driver")
>> Signed-off-by: Wang ShaoBo <[email protected]>
>> ---
>> drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c b/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c
>> index 3c68bb525d5d..456b9ca1fe8d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c
>> +++ b/drivers/edac/mv64x60_edac.c
>> @@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ static int mv64x60_pci_err_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> if (edac_pci_add_device(pci, pdata->edac_idx) > 0) {
>> edac_dbg(3, "failed edac_pci_add_device()\n");
>> + res = -ENODEV;
>> goto err;
>> }
>
> That driver depends on MV64X60 and I don't see anything in the tree
> enabling it and I can't select it AFAICT:
>
> config MV64X60
> bool
> select PPC_INDIRECT_PCI
> select CHECK_CACHE_COHERENCY
It was selected by PPC_C2K, but that was dropped in:
92c8c16f3457 ("powerpc/embedded6xx: Remove C2K board support")
> PPC folks, what do we do here?
>
> If not used anymore, I'd love to have one less EDAC driver.
It's dead code, so drop it.
I can send a patch if no one else wants to.
cheers
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 10:27:25PM +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> It's dead code, so drop it.
>
> I can send a patch if no one else wants to.
Yes please.
I love patches removing code! :-)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette