blk_throtl_update_limit_valid() will search for descendants to see if
'LIMIT_LOW' of bps/iops and READ/WRITE is nonzero. However, they're always
zero if CONFIG_BLK_DEV_THROTTLING_LOW is not set, furthermore, a lot of
time will be wasted to iterate descendants.
Thus do nothing in blk_throtl_update_limit_valid() in such situation.
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <[email protected]>
---
block/blk-throttle.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/block/blk-throttle.c b/block/blk-throttle.c
index b771c4299982..d52cac9f3a7c 100644
--- a/block/blk-throttle.c
+++ b/block/blk-throttle.c
@@ -587,6 +587,7 @@ static void throtl_pd_online(struct blkg_policy_data *pd)
tg_update_has_rules(tg);
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_BLK_DEV_THROTTLING_LOW
static void blk_throtl_update_limit_valid(struct throtl_data *td)
{
struct cgroup_subsys_state *pos_css;
@@ -607,6 +608,11 @@ static void blk_throtl_update_limit_valid(struct throtl_data *td)
td->limit_valid[LIMIT_LOW] = low_valid;
}
+#else
+static inline void blk_throtl_update_limit_valid(struct throtl_data *td)
+{
+}
+#endif
static void throtl_upgrade_state(struct throtl_data *td);
static void throtl_pd_offline(struct blkg_policy_data *pd)
--
2.25.4
On Thu, Nov 26, 2020 at 11:18:34AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
> blk_throtl_update_limit_valid() will search for descendants to see if
> 'LIMIT_LOW' of bps/iops and READ/WRITE is nonzero. However, they're always
> zero if CONFIG_BLK_DEV_THROTTLING_LOW is not set, furthermore, a lot of
> time will be wasted to iterate descendants.
>
> Thus do nothing in blk_throtl_update_limit_valid() in such situation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Tejun Heo <[email protected]>
Thanks.
--
tejun
On 11/25/20 8:18 PM, Yu Kuai wrote:
> blk_throtl_update_limit_valid() will search for descendants to see if
> 'LIMIT_LOW' of bps/iops and READ/WRITE is nonzero. However, they're always
> zero if CONFIG_BLK_DEV_THROTTLING_LOW is not set, furthermore, a lot of
> time will be wasted to iterate descendants.
>
> Thus do nothing in blk_throtl_update_limit_valid() in such situation.
Applied, thanks.
--
Jens Axboe