2020-11-30 20:40:34

by Sakari Ailus

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/18] ipu3-cio2: Add functionality allowing software_node connections to sensors on platforms designed for Windows

Hi Daniel,

Thanks for the update! This is starting to look really nice!

Please still see my comments below.

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:31:24PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
> Currently on platforms designed for Windows, connections between CIO2 and
> sensors are not properly defined in DSDT. This patch extends the ipu3-cio2
> driver to compensate by building software_node connections, parsing the
> connection properties from the sensor's SSDB buffer.
>
> Suggested-by: Jordan Hand <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Scally <[email protected]>
> ---
> Changes since RFC v3:
>
> - Removed almost all global variables, dynamically allocated
> the cio2_bridge structure, plus a bunch of associated changes
> like
> - Added a new function to ipu3-cio2-main.c to check for an
> existing fwnode_graph before calling cio2_bridge_init()
> - Prefixed cio2_bridge_ to any variables and functions that
> lacked it
> - Assigned the new fwnode directly to the sensor's ACPI device
> fwnode as secondary. This removes the requirement to delay until
> the I2C devices are instantiated before ipu3-cio2 can probe, but
> it has a side effect, which is that those devices then grab a ref
> to the new software_node. This effectively prevents us from
> unloading the driver, because we can't free the memory that they
> live in whilst the device holds a reference to them. The work
> around at the moment is to _not_ unregister the software_nodes
> when ipu3-cio2 is unloaded; this becomes a one-time 'patch', that
> is simply skipped if the module is reloaded.
> - Moved the sensor's SSDB struct to be a member of cio2_sensor
> - Replaced ints with unsigned ints where appropriate
> - Iterated over all ACPI devices of a matching _HID rather than
> just the first to ensure we handle a device with multiple sensors
> of the same model.
>
> MAINTAINERS | 1 +
> drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Kconfig | 18 ++
> drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c | 260 ++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h | 108 ++++++++
> drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2-main.c | 27 ++
> drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.h | 6 +
> 7 files changed, 421 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h
>
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 9702b886d6a4..188559a0a610 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -8927,6 +8927,7 @@ INTEL IPU3 CSI-2 CIO2 DRIVER
> M: Yong Zhi <[email protected]>
> M: Sakari Ailus <[email protected]>
> M: Bingbu Cao <[email protected]>
> +M: Dan Scally <[email protected]>
> R: Tianshu Qiu <[email protected]>
> L: [email protected]
> S: Maintained
> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Kconfig b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Kconfig
> index 82d7f17e6a02..2b3350d042be 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Kconfig
> @@ -16,3 +16,21 @@ config VIDEO_IPU3_CIO2
> Say Y or M here if you have a Skylake/Kaby Lake SoC with MIPI CSI-2
> connected camera.
> The module will be called ipu3-cio2.
> +
> +config CIO2_BRIDGE
> + bool "IPU3 CIO2 Sensors Bridge"
> + depends on VIDEO_IPU3_CIO2
> + help
> + This extension provides an API for the ipu3-cio2 driver to create
> + connections to cameras that are hidden in SSDB buffer in ACPI. It
> + can be used to enable support for cameras in detachable / hybrid
> + devices that ship with Windows.
> +
> + Say Y here if your device is a detachable / hybrid laptop that comes
> + with Windows installed by the OEM, for example:
> +
> + - Microsoft Surface models (except Surface Pro 3)
> + - The Lenovo Miix line (for example the 510, 520, 710 and 720)
> + - Dell 7285
> +
> + If in doubt, say N here.
> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Makefile b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Makefile
> index 429d516452e4..933777e6ea8a 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/Makefile
> @@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
> obj-$(CONFIG_VIDEO_IPU3_CIO2) += ipu3-cio2.o
>
> ipu3-cio2-y += ipu3-cio2-main.o
> +ipu3-cio2-$(CONFIG_CIO2_BRIDGE) += cio2-bridge.o
> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..fd3f8ba07274
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,260 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/* Author: Dan Scally <[email protected]> */
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +#include <linux/device.h>
> +#include <linux/i2c.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/property.h>
> +#include <media/v4l2-subdev.h>
> +
> +#include "cio2-bridge.h"
> +
> +/*
> + * Extend this array with ACPI Hardware ID's of devices known to be working.
> + * Do not add a HID for a sensor that is not actually supported.
> + */
> +static const char * const cio2_supported_devices[] = {
> + "INT33BE",
> + "OVTI2680",

I guess we don't have the known-good frequencies for the CSI-2 bus in
firmware?

One option would be to put there what the drivers currently use. This
assumes the support for these devices is, well, somewhat opportunistic but
I guess there's no way around that right now at least.

As the systems are laptops, they're likely somewhat less prone to EMI
issues to begin with than mobile phones anyway.

> +};
> +
> +static int cio2_bridge_read_acpi_buffer(struct acpi_device *adev, char *id,
> + void *data, u32 size)
> +{
> + struct acpi_buffer buffer = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER, NULL };
> + union acpi_object *obj;
> + acpi_status status;
> + int ret;
> +
> + status = acpi_evaluate_object(adev->handle, id, NULL, &buffer);
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + obj = buffer.pointer;
> + if (!obj) {
> + dev_err(&adev->dev, "Couldn't locate ACPI buffer\n");
> + return -ENODEV;
> + }
> +
> + if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) {
> + dev_err(&adev->dev, "Not an ACPI buffer\n");
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto out_free_buff;
> + }
> +
> + if (obj->buffer.length > size) {
> + dev_err(&adev->dev, "Given buffer is too small\n");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + goto out_free_buff;
> + }
> +
> + memcpy(data, obj->buffer.pointer, obj->buffer.length);
> + ret = obj->buffer.length;
> +
> +out_free_buff:
> + kfree(buffer.pointer);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static void cio2_bridge_init_property_names(struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
> +{
> + strcpy(sensor->prop_names.clock_frequency, "clock-frequency");
> + strcpy(sensor->prop_names.rotation, "rotation");
> + strcpy(sensor->prop_names.bus_type, "bus-type");
> + strcpy(sensor->prop_names.data_lanes, "data-lanes");
> + strcpy(sensor->prop_names.remote_endpoint, "remote-endpoint");

Please use the actual field size instead with strncpy / strscpy.

> +}
> +
> +static void cio2_bridge_create_fwnode_properties(struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
> +{
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + cio2_bridge_init_property_names(sensor);
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < 4; i++)
> + sensor->data_lanes[i] = i + 1;
> +
> + /*
> + * Can't use PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF because it creates a new variable to
> + * point to, which doesn't survive the function.
> + */
> + sensor->local_ref[0] = (struct software_node_ref_args){
> + .node = &sensor->swnodes[SWNODE_CIO2_ENDPOINT]
> + };

I guess this line should be unindented by one tab stop. Same for the
similar case below.

> + sensor->remote_ref[0] = (struct software_node_ref_args){
> + .node = &sensor->swnodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_ENDPOINT]
> + };
> +
> + sensor->dev_properties[0] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32(sensor->prop_names.clock_frequency,
> + sensor->ssdb.mclkspeed);
> + sensor->dev_properties[1] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_U8(sensor->prop_names.rotation,
> + sensor->ssdb.degree);
> +
> + sensor->ep_properties[0] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32(sensor->prop_names.bus_type, 5);
> + sensor->ep_properties[1] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32_ARRAY_LEN(sensor->prop_names.data_lanes,
> + sensor->data_lanes,
> + sensor->ssdb.lanes);
> + sensor->ep_properties[2] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF_ARRAY(sensor->prop_names.remote_endpoint,
> + sensor->local_ref);
> +
> + sensor->cio2_properties[0] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_U32_ARRAY_LEN(sensor->prop_names.data_lanes,
> + sensor->data_lanes,
> + sensor->ssdb.lanes);
> + sensor->cio2_properties[1] = PROPERTY_ENTRY_REF_ARRAY(sensor->prop_names.remote_endpoint,
> + sensor->remote_ref);
> +}
> +
> +static void cio2_bridge_init_swnode_names(struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
> +{
> + snprintf(sensor->node_names.remote_port, 6, "port%u", sensor->ssdb.link);
> + strcpy(sensor->node_names.port, "port0");
> + strcpy(sensor->node_names.endpoint, "endpoint0");

Please use the actual size of the field, and strncpy / strscpy.

> +}
> +
> +static void cio2_bridge_create_connection_swnodes(struct cio2_bridge *bridge,
> + struct cio2_sensor *sensor)
> +{
> + struct software_node *nodes = sensor->swnodes;
> +
> + cio2_bridge_init_swnode_names(sensor);
> +
> + nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_HID] = NODE_SENSOR(sensor->name,
> + sensor->dev_properties);
> + nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_PORT] = NODE_PORT(sensor->node_names.port,
> + &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_HID]);
> + nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_ENDPOINT] = NODE_ENDPOINT(sensor->node_names.endpoint,
> + &nodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_PORT],
> + sensor->ep_properties);
> + nodes[SWNODE_CIO2_PORT] = NODE_PORT(sensor->node_names.remote_port,
> + &bridge->cio2_hid_node);
> + nodes[SWNODE_CIO2_ENDPOINT] = NODE_ENDPOINT(sensor->node_names.endpoint,
> + &nodes[SWNODE_CIO2_PORT],
> + sensor->cio2_properties);
> +}
> +
> +static void cio2_bridge_unregister_sensors(struct cio2_bridge *bridge)
> +{
> + struct cio2_sensor *sensor;
> + unsigned int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < bridge->n_sensors; i++) {
> + sensor = &bridge->sensors[i];
> + software_node_unregister_nodes(sensor->swnodes);
> + acpi_dev_put(sensor->adev);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int cio2_bridge_connect_sensors(struct cio2_bridge *bridge)
> +{
> + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
> + struct cio2_sensor *sensor;
> + struct acpi_device *adev;
> + unsigned int i;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(cio2_supported_devices); i++) {
> + const char *this_device = cio2_supported_devices[i];
> +
> + for_each_acpi_dev_match(adev, this_device, NULL, -1) {
> + if (!adev || !(adev->status.present && adev->status.enabled))
> + continue;
> +
> + sensor = &bridge->sensors[bridge->n_sensors];
> + sensor->adev = adev;
> + strscpy(sensor->name, this_device, sizeof(sensor->name));
> +
> + ret = cio2_bridge_read_acpi_buffer(adev, "SSDB",
> + &sensor->ssdb,
> + sizeof(sensor->ssdb));
> + if (ret < 0)
> + goto err_put_adev;
> +
> + if (sensor->ssdb.lanes > 4) {
> + dev_err(&adev->dev,
> + "Number of lanes in SSDB is invalid\n");
> + goto err_put_adev;
> + }
> +
> + cio2_bridge_create_fwnode_properties(sensor);
> + cio2_bridge_create_connection_swnodes(bridge, sensor);
> +
> + ret = software_node_register_nodes(sensor->swnodes);
> + if (ret)
> + goto err_put_adev;
> +
> + fwnode = software_node_fwnode(&sensor->swnodes[SWNODE_SENSOR_HID]);
> + if (!fwnode) {
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto err_free_swnodes;
> + }
> +
> + adev->fwnode.secondary = fwnode;
> +
> + dev_info(&bridge->cio2->dev,
> + "Found supported sensor %s\n",
> + acpi_dev_name(adev));
> +
> + bridge->n_sensors++;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +
> +err_free_swnodes:
> + software_node_unregister_nodes(sensor->swnodes);
> +err_put_adev:
> + acpi_dev_put(sensor->adev);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +int cio2_bridge_init(struct pci_dev *cio2)
> +{
> + struct device *dev = &cio2->dev;
> + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
> + struct cio2_bridge *bridge;
> + int ret;
> +
> + bridge = kzalloc(sizeof(*bridge), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!bridge)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + strscpy(bridge->cio2_node_name, CIO2_HID, sizeof(bridge->cio2_node_name));
> + bridge->cio2_hid_node = (const struct software_node){ bridge->cio2_node_name };
> + bridge->cio2 = pci_dev_get(cio2);
> +
> + ret = software_node_register(&bridge->cio2_hid_node);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to register the CIO2 HID node\n");
> + goto err_put_cio2;
> + }
> +
> + ret = cio2_bridge_connect_sensors(bridge);
> + if (ret || bridge->n_sensors == 0)
> + goto err_unregister_cio2;
> +
> + dev_info(dev, "Connected %d cameras\n", bridge->n_sensors);
> +
> + fwnode = software_node_fwnode(&bridge->cio2_hid_node);
> + if (!fwnode) {
> + dev_err(dev, "Error getting fwnode from cio2 software_node\n");
> + ret = -ENODEV;
> + goto err_unregister_sensors;
> + }
> +
> + set_secondary_fwnode(dev, fwnode);
> +
> + return 0;
> +
> +err_unregister_sensors:
> + cio2_bridge_unregister_sensors(bridge);
> +err_unregister_cio2:
> + software_node_unregister(&bridge->cio2_hid_node);
> +err_put_cio2:
> + pci_dev_put(bridge->cio2);
> +
> + kfree(bridge);
> + return ret;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..96f5c8a12be0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/cio2-bridge.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,108 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/* Author: Dan Scally <[email protected]> */
> +#ifndef __CIO2_BRIDGE_H
> +#define __CIO2_BRIDGE_H
> +
> +#include <linux/property.h>
> +
> +#define CIO2_HID "INT343E"
> +#define CIO2_NUM_PORTS 4
> +
> +#define NODE_SENSOR(_HID, _PROPS) \
> + ((const struct software_node) { \
> + .name = _HID, \
> + .properties = _PROPS, \
> + })
> +
> +#define NODE_PORT(_PORT, _SENSOR_NODE) \
> + ((const struct software_node) { \
> + _PORT, \
> + _SENSOR_NODE, \
> + })
> +
> +#define NODE_ENDPOINT(_EP, _PORT, _PROPS) \
> + ((const struct software_node) { \
> + _EP, \
> + _PORT, \
> + _PROPS, \
> + })
> +
> +enum cio2_sensor_swnodes {
> + SWNODE_SENSOR_HID,
> + SWNODE_SENSOR_PORT,
> + SWNODE_SENSOR_ENDPOINT,
> + SWNODE_CIO2_PORT,
> + SWNODE_CIO2_ENDPOINT,
> + NR_OF_SENSOR_SWNODES
> +};
> +
> +/* Data representation as it is in ACPI SSDB buffer */
> +struct cio2_sensor_ssdb {
> + u8 version;
> + u8 sku;
> + u8 guid_csi2[16];
> + u8 devfunction;
> + u8 bus;
> + u32 dphylinkenfuses;
> + u32 clockdiv;
> + u8 link;
> + u8 lanes;
> + u32 csiparams[10];
> + u32 maxlanespeed;
> + u8 sensorcalibfileidx;
> + u8 sensorcalibfileidxInMBZ[3];
> + u8 romtype;
> + u8 vcmtype;
> + u8 platforminfo;
> + u8 platformsubinfo;
> + u8 flash;
> + u8 privacyled;
> + u8 degree;
> + u8 mipilinkdefined;
> + u32 mclkspeed;
> + u8 controllogicid;
> + u8 reserved1[3];
> + u8 mclkport;
> + u8 reserved2[13];
> +} __packed__;

This should be "__packed".

> +
> +struct cio2_property_names {
> + char clock_frequency[16];
> + char rotation[9];
> + char bus_type[9];
> + char data_lanes[11];
> + char remote_endpoint[16];
> +};
> +
> +struct cio2_node_names {
> + char port[6];
> + char endpoint[10];
> + char remote_port[6];
> +};
> +
> +struct cio2_sensor {
> + char name[ACPI_ID_LEN];
> + struct acpi_device *adev;
> +
> + struct software_node swnodes[6];
> + struct cio2_node_names node_names;
> +
> + u32 data_lanes[4];
> + struct cio2_sensor_ssdb ssdb;
> + struct cio2_property_names prop_names;
> + struct property_entry ep_properties[4];
> + struct property_entry dev_properties[3];
> + struct property_entry cio2_properties[3];
> + struct software_node_ref_args local_ref[1];
> + struct software_node_ref_args remote_ref[1];
> +};
> +
> +struct cio2_bridge {
> + struct pci_dev *cio2;
> + char cio2_node_name[ACPI_ID_LEN];
> + struct software_node cio2_hid_node;
> + unsigned int n_sensors;
> + struct cio2_sensor sensors[CIO2_NUM_PORTS];
> +};
> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2-main.c b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2-main.c
> index 36e354ecf71e..0d69b593e9f0 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2-main.c
> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2-main.c
> @@ -1702,6 +1702,22 @@ static void cio2_queues_exit(struct cio2_device *cio2)
> cio2_queue_exit(cio2, &cio2->queue[i]);
> }
>
> +static bool cio2_check_fwnode_graph(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> +{
> + struct fwnode_handle *endpoint;
> +
> + if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fwnode))
> + return false;
> +
> + endpoint = fwnode_graph_get_next_endpoint(fwnode, NULL);
> + if (endpoint) {
> + fwnode_handle_put(endpoint);
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + return cio2_check_fwnode_graph(fwnode->secondary);
> +}
> +
> /**************** PCI interface ****************/
>
> static int cio2_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pci_dev,
> @@ -1715,6 +1731,17 @@ static int cio2_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pci_dev,
> return -ENOMEM;
> cio2->pci_dev = pci_dev;
>
> + /*
> + * On some platforms no connections to sensors are defined in firmware,
> + * if the device has no endpoints then we can try to build those as
> + * software_nodes parsed from SSDB.
> + */
> + if (!cio2_check_fwnode_graph(dev_fwnode(&pci_dev->dev))) {
> + r = cio2_bridge_init(pci_dev);
> + if (r)
> + return r;
> + }
> +
> r = pcim_enable_device(pci_dev);
> if (r) {
> dev_err(&pci_dev->dev, "failed to enable device (%d)\n", r);
> diff --git a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.h b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.h
> index ccf0b85ae36f..520a27c9cdad 100644
> --- a/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.h
> +++ b/drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3/ipu3-cio2.h
> @@ -437,4 +437,10 @@ static inline struct cio2_queue *vb2q_to_cio2_queue(struct vb2_queue *vq)
> return container_of(vq, struct cio2_queue, vbq);
> }
>
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CIO2_BRIDGE)
> +int cio2_bridge_init(struct pci_dev *cio2);
> +#else
> +int cio2_bridge_init(struct pci_dev *cio2) { return 0; }
> +#endif
> +
> #endif

--
Kind regards,

Sakari Ailus


2020-12-01 15:11:32

by Andy Shevchenko

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/18] ipu3-cio2: Add functionality allowing software_node connections to sensors on platforms designed for Windows

On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 10:35:51PM +0200, Sakari Ailus wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 30, 2020 at 01:31:24PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:

...

> > +/*
> > + * Extend this array with ACPI Hardware ID's of devices known to be working.
> > + * Do not add a HID for a sensor that is not actually supported.
> > + */
> > +static const char * const cio2_supported_devices[] = {
> > + "INT33BE",
> > + "OVTI2680",
>
> I guess we don't have the known-good frequencies for the CSI-2 bus in
> firmware?
>
> One option would be to put there what the drivers currently use. This
> assumes the support for these devices is, well, somewhat opportunistic but
> I guess there's no way around that right now at least.
>
> As the systems are laptops, they're likely somewhat less prone to EMI
> issues to begin with than mobile phones anyway.

ACPI has only XTAL clock frequency (dunno if it's the same as CSI-2 bus clock).
Currently it may be one out of 19.2 MHz, 24 MHz (with a remark that all sensors
must use same value as PMIC can't produce several clocks).

> > +};

...

> > + strcpy(sensor->prop_names.clock_frequency, "clock-frequency");
> > + strcpy(sensor->prop_names.rotation, "rotation");
> > + strcpy(sensor->prop_names.bus_type, "bus-type");
> > + strcpy(sensor->prop_names.data_lanes, "data-lanes");
> > + strcpy(sensor->prop_names.remote_endpoint, "remote-endpoint");
>
> Please use the actual field size instead with strncpy / strscpy.

Perhaps Laurent's proposal is better?

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko