Have the `put_device()` call after `device_unregister()` in both
`zfcp_unit_remove()` and `zfcp_sysfs_port_remove_store()` to make
it more natural, for put_device() ought to be the last time we
touch the object in both functions.
And add comments after put_device to make codes clearer.
Suggested-by: Steffen Maier <[email protected]>
Suggested-by: Benjamin Block <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Qinglang Miao <[email protected]>
---
v2: add comments after put_device as Steffen suggested.
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs.c | 4 ++--
drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_unit.c | 4 ++--
2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs.c
index 8d9662e8b..ef6d35a37 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_sysfs.c
@@ -327,10 +327,10 @@ static ssize_t zfcp_sysfs_port_remove_store(struct device *dev,
list_del(&port->list);
write_unlock_irq(&adapter->port_list_lock);
- put_device(&port->dev);
-
zfcp_erp_port_shutdown(port, 0, "syprs_1");
device_unregister(&port->dev);
+
+ put_device(&port->dev); /* undo zfcp_get_port_by_wwpn() */
out:
zfcp_ccw_adapter_put(adapter);
return retval ? retval : (ssize_t) count;
diff --git a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_unit.c b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_unit.c
index e67bf7388..59333f025 100644
--- a/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_unit.c
+++ b/drivers/s390/scsi/zfcp_unit.c
@@ -255,9 +255,9 @@ int zfcp_unit_remove(struct zfcp_port *port, u64 fcp_lun)
scsi_device_put(sdev);
}
- put_device(&unit->dev);
-
device_unregister(&unit->dev);
+ put_device(&unit->dev); /* undo _zfcp_unit_find() */
+
return 0;
}
--
2.23.0