percent_fp() was used in intel_pstate_pid_reset(), which was removed in
commit 9d0ef7af1f2d ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Do not use PID-based P-state
selection") and hence, percent_fp() is unused since then.
percent_ext_fp() was last used in intel_pstate_update_perf_limits(), which
was refactored in commit 1a4fe38add8b ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Remove
max/min fractions to limit performance"), and hence, percent_ext_fp() is
unused since then.
make CC=clang W=1 points us those unused functions:
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:79:23: warning: unused function 'percent_fp' [-Wunused-function]
static inline int32_t percent_fp(int percent)
^
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:94:23: warning: unused function 'percent_ext_fp' [-Wunused-function]
static inline int32_t percent_ext_fp(int percent)
^
Remove those obsolete functions.
Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <[email protected]>
---
applies cleanly on current master and next-20201221
Srinivas, Len, Rafael, Viresh, please pick this minor non-urgent cleanup patch.
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 10 ----------
1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
index 2a4db856222f..0e35dd247986 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -76,11 +76,6 @@ static inline int ceiling_fp(int32_t x)
return ret;
}
-static inline int32_t percent_fp(int percent)
-{
- return div_fp(percent, 100);
-}
-
static inline u64 mul_ext_fp(u64 x, u64 y)
{
return (x * y) >> EXT_FRAC_BITS;
@@ -91,11 +86,6 @@ static inline u64 div_ext_fp(u64 x, u64 y)
return div64_u64(x << EXT_FRAC_BITS, y);
}
-static inline int32_t percent_ext_fp(int percent)
-{
- return div_ext_fp(percent, 100);
-}
-
/**
* struct sample - Store performance sample
* @core_avg_perf: Ratio of APERF/MPERF which is the actual average
--
2.17.1
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 06:13:20AM +0100, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> percent_fp() was used in intel_pstate_pid_reset(), which was removed in
> commit 9d0ef7af1f2d ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Do not use PID-based P-state
> selection") and hence, percent_fp() is unused since then.
>
> percent_ext_fp() was last used in intel_pstate_update_perf_limits(), which
> was refactored in commit 1a4fe38add8b ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Remove
> max/min fractions to limit performance"), and hence, percent_ext_fp() is
> unused since then.
>
> make CC=clang W=1 points us those unused functions:
>
> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:79:23: warning: unused function 'percent_fp' [-Wunused-function]
> static inline int32_t percent_fp(int percent)
> ^
>
> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:94:23: warning: unused function 'percent_ext_fp' [-Wunused-function]
> static inline int32_t percent_ext_fp(int percent)
> ^
>
> Remove those obsolete functions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <[email protected]>
Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
> ---
> applies cleanly on current master and next-20201221
>
> Srinivas, Len, Rafael, Viresh, please pick this minor non-urgent cleanup patch.
>
> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 10 ----------
> 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> index 2a4db856222f..0e35dd247986 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -76,11 +76,6 @@ static inline int ceiling_fp(int32_t x)
> return ret;
> }
>
> -static inline int32_t percent_fp(int percent)
> -{
> - return div_fp(percent, 100);
> -}
> -
> static inline u64 mul_ext_fp(u64 x, u64 y)
> {
> return (x * y) >> EXT_FRAC_BITS;
> @@ -91,11 +86,6 @@ static inline u64 div_ext_fp(u64 x, u64 y)
> return div64_u64(x << EXT_FRAC_BITS, y);
> }
>
> -static inline int32_t percent_ext_fp(int percent)
> -{
> - return div_ext_fp(percent, 100);
> -}
> -
> /**
> * struct sample - Store performance sample
> * @core_avg_perf: Ratio of APERF/MPERF which is the actual average
> --
> 2.17.1
>
On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 11:21 PM Nathan Chancellor
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2020 at 06:13:20AM +0100, Lukas Bulwahn wrote:
> > percent_fp() was used in intel_pstate_pid_reset(), which was removed in
> > commit 9d0ef7af1f2d ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Do not use PID-based P-state
> > selection") and hence, percent_fp() is unused since then.
> >
> > percent_ext_fp() was last used in intel_pstate_update_perf_limits(), which
> > was refactored in commit 1a4fe38add8b ("cpufreq: intel_pstate: Remove
> > max/min fractions to limit performance"), and hence, percent_ext_fp() is
> > unused since then.
> >
> > make CC=clang W=1 points us those unused functions:
> >
> > drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:79:23: warning: unused function 'percent_fp' [-Wunused-function]
> > static inline int32_t percent_fp(int percent)
> > ^
> >
> > drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c:94:23: warning: unused function 'percent_ext_fp' [-Wunused-function]
> > static inline int32_t percent_ext_fp(int percent)
> > ^
> >
> > Remove those obsolete functions.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lukas Bulwahn <[email protected]>
>
> Reviewed-by: Nathan Chancellor <[email protected]>
>
> > ---
> > applies cleanly on current master and next-20201221
> >
> > Srinivas, Len, Rafael, Viresh, please pick this minor non-urgent cleanup patch.
> >
> > drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 10 ----------
> > 1 file changed, 10 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > index 2a4db856222f..0e35dd247986 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> > @@ -76,11 +76,6 @@ static inline int ceiling_fp(int32_t x)
> > return ret;
> > }
> >
> > -static inline int32_t percent_fp(int percent)
> > -{
> > - return div_fp(percent, 100);
> > -}
> > -
> > static inline u64 mul_ext_fp(u64 x, u64 y)
> > {
> > return (x * y) >> EXT_FRAC_BITS;
> > @@ -91,11 +86,6 @@ static inline u64 div_ext_fp(u64 x, u64 y)
> > return div64_u64(x << EXT_FRAC_BITS, y);
> > }
> >
> > -static inline int32_t percent_ext_fp(int percent)
> > -{
> > - return div_ext_fp(percent, 100);
> > -}
> > -
> > /**
> > * struct sample - Store performance sample
> > * @core_avg_perf: Ratio of APERF/MPERF which is the actual average
> > --
Applied as 5.11-rc material, thanks!