2021-01-08 10:57:58

by Geert Uytterhoeven

Subject: [PATCH trivial] MIPS: bitops: Fix reference to ffz location

Unlike most other architectures, MIPS defines ffz() below ffs().

Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
---
arch/mips/include/asm/bitops.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/arch/mips/include/asm/bitops.h b/arch/mips/include/asm/bitops.h
index a74769940fbd983c..1b08f9f38593ce15 100644
--- a/arch/mips/include/asm/bitops.h
+++ b/arch/mips/include/asm/bitops.h
@@ -435,7 +435,7 @@ static inline int fls(unsigned int x)
*
* This is defined the same way as
* the libc and compiler builtin ffs routines, therefore
- * differs in spirit from the above ffz (man ffs).
+ * differs in spirit from the below ffz (man ffs).
*/
static inline int ffs(int word)
{
--
2.25.1

2021-01-09 20:34:36

by Thomas Bogendoerfer

Subject: Re: [PATCH trivial] MIPS: bitops: Fix reference to ffz location

On Fri, Jan 08, 2021 at 11:55:26AM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> Unlike most other architectures, MIPS defines ffz() below ffs().
>
> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/mips/include/asm/bitops.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

applied to mips-next.

Thomas.

--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]