2021-01-30 09:15:15

by chenzhou

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH v14 07/11] arm64: kdump: introduce some macroes for crash kernel reservation

Introduce macro CRASH_ALIGN for alignment, macro CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX
for upper bound of low crash memory, macro CRASH_ADDR_HIGH_MAX for
upper bound of high crash memory, use macroes instead.

Besides, keep consistent with x86, use CRASH_ALIGN as the lower bound
of crash kernel reservation.

Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <[email protected]>
Tested-by: John Donnelly <[email protected]>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h | 6 ++++++
arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 6 +++---
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h
index d24b527e8c00..3f6ecae0bc68 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h
@@ -25,6 +25,12 @@

#define KEXEC_ARCH KEXEC_ARCH_AARCH64

+/* 2M alignment for crash kernel regions */
+#define CRASH_ALIGN SZ_2M
+
+#define CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX arm64_dma_phys_limit
+#define CRASH_ADDR_HIGH_MAX MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE
+
#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__

/**
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
index 709d98fea90c..912f64f505f7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
@@ -84,8 +84,8 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)

if (crash_base == 0) {
/* Current arm64 boot protocol requires 2MB alignment */
- crash_base = memblock_find_in_range(0, arm64_dma_phys_limit,
- crash_size, SZ_2M);
+ crash_base = memblock_find_in_range(CRASH_ALIGN, CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX,
+ crash_size, CRASH_ALIGN);
if (crash_base == 0) {
pr_warn("cannot allocate crashkernel (size:0x%llx)\n",
crash_size);
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
return;
}

- if (!IS_ALIGNED(crash_base, SZ_2M)) {
+ if (!IS_ALIGNED(crash_base, CRASH_ALIGN)) {
pr_warn("cannot reserve crashkernel: base address is not 2MB aligned\n");
return;
}
--
2.20.1


2021-02-04 16:24:01

by Nicolas Saenz Julienne

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 07/11] arm64: kdump: introduce some macroes for crash kernel reservation

Hi Chen,

On Sat, 2021-01-30 at 15:10 +0800, Chen Zhou wrote:
> Introduce macro CRASH_ALIGN for alignment, macro CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX
> for upper bound of low crash memory, macro CRASH_ADDR_HIGH_MAX for
> upper bound of high crash memory, use macroes instead.
>
> Besides, keep consistent with x86, use CRASH_ALIGN as the lower bound
> of crash kernel reservation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <[email protected]>
> Tested-by: John Donnelly <[email protected]>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h | 6 ++++++
>  arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 6 +++---
>  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h
> index d24b527e8c00..3f6ecae0bc68 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,12 @@
>  
>
>  #define KEXEC_ARCH KEXEC_ARCH_AARCH64
>  
>
> +/* 2M alignment for crash kernel regions */
> +#define CRASH_ALIGN SZ_2M
> +
> +#define CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX arm64_dma_phys_limit

I wonder if you could use 'ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT', instead of creating a new
define.

> +#define CRASH_ADDR_HIGH_MAX MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE
> +
>  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>  
>
>  /**
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> index 709d98fea90c..912f64f505f7 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> @@ -84,8 +84,8 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
>  
>
>   if (crash_base == 0) {
>   /* Current arm64 boot protocol requires 2MB alignment */
> - crash_base = memblock_find_in_range(0, arm64_dma_phys_limit,
> - crash_size, SZ_2M);
> + crash_base = memblock_find_in_range(CRASH_ALIGN, CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX,
> + crash_size, CRASH_ALIGN);

Actually we could get rid of CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX altogether if we used
memblock_alloc_low() here (modulo the slight refactoring needed to accommodate
it).

Regards,
Nicolas


Attachments:
signature.asc (499.00 B)
This is a digitally signed message part

2021-02-04 16:33:18

by Nicolas Saenz Julienne

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 07/11] arm64: kdump: introduce some macroes for crash kernel reservation

On Thu, 2021-02-04 at 17:20 +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> Hi Chen,
>
> On Sat, 2021-01-30 at 15:10 +0800, Chen Zhou wrote:
> > Introduce macro CRASH_ALIGN for alignment, macro CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX
> > for upper bound of low crash memory, macro CRASH_ADDR_HIGH_MAX for
> > upper bound of high crash memory, use macroes instead.
> >
> > Besides, keep consistent with x86, use CRASH_ALIGN as the lower bound
> > of crash kernel reservation.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <[email protected]>
> > Tested-by: John Donnelly <[email protected]>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h | 6 ++++++
> >  arch/arm64/mm/init.c | 6 +++---
> >  2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h
> > index d24b527e8c00..3f6ecae0bc68 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kexec.h
> > @@ -25,6 +25,12 @@
> >  
> >
> >  #define KEXEC_ARCH KEXEC_ARCH_AARCH64
> >  
> >
> > +/* 2M alignment for crash kernel regions */
> > +#define CRASH_ALIGN SZ_2M
> > +
> > +#define CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX arm64_dma_phys_limit
>
> I wonder if you could use 'ARCH_LOW_ADDRESS_LIMIT', instead of creating a new
> define.
>
> > +#define CRASH_ADDR_HIGH_MAX MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE
> > +
> >  #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> >  
> >
> >  /**
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > index 709d98fea90c..912f64f505f7 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
> > @@ -84,8 +84,8 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
> >  
> >
> >   if (crash_base == 0) {
> >   /* Current arm64 boot protocol requires 2MB alignment */
> > - crash_base = memblock_find_in_range(0, arm64_dma_phys_limit,
> > - crash_size, SZ_2M);
> > + crash_base = memblock_find_in_range(CRASH_ALIGN, CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX,
> > + crash_size, CRASH_ALIGN);
>
> Actually we could get rid of CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX altogether if we used
> memblock_alloc_low() here (modulo the slight refactoring needed to accommodate
> it).

Forget about these coments, I now see that you're deleting this whole function
on the next patch and defaulting to a generic implementation. Sorry for the
noise.

Regards,
Nicolas


Attachments:
signature.asc (499.00 B)
This is a digitally signed message part