To improve human readability and enable automatic validation, the tuples
in "playback" and "capture" properties in sound device nodes should be
grouped using angle brackets.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rsnd.yaml | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rsnd.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rsnd.yaml
index 0fd37aa84947aa89..2e1046513603ed01 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rsnd.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/sound/renesas,rsnd.yaml
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ examples:
/* DAI base */
rcar_sound,dai {
dai0 {
- playback = <&ssi5 &src5>;
+ playback = <&ssi5>, <&src5>;
capture = <&ssi6>;
};
dai1 {
@@ -430,8 +430,8 @@ examples:
bitclock-master = <&rsnd_endpoint0>;
frame-master = <&rsnd_endpoint0>;
- playback = <&ssi0 &src0 &dvc0>;
- capture = <&ssi1 &src1 &dvc1>;
+ playback = <&ssi0>, <&src0>, <&dvc0>;
+ capture = <&ssi1>, <&src1>, <&dvc1>;
};
};
};
--
2.25.1
On Thu, 4 Feb 2021 14:00:22 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> To improve human readability and enable automatic validation, the tuples
> in "playback" and "capture" properties in sound device nodes should be
> grouped using angle brackets.
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: dt-bindings: renesas, rsnd: Group tuples in playback/capture properties
commit: f08c74a3b52d126d053c741b906ee1ca2a4f3568
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.
You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.
If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.
Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.
Thanks,
Mark