s/theroretical/theoretical/
Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <[email protected]>
---
arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
index 3c9c7492252f..aa9d3cf69580 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
@@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@ void irq_force_complete_move(struct irq_desc *desc)
* of the interrupt on the apic/system bus would be delayed
* beyond the point where the target cpu disables interrupts
* in stop machine. I doubt that it can happen, but at least
- * there is a theroretical chance. Virtualization might be
+ * there is a theoretical chance. Virtualization might be
* able to expose this, but AFAICT the IOAPIC emulation is not
* as stupid as the real hardware.
*
--
2.30.0
On 2/9/21 5:55 AM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>
> s/theroretical/theoretical/
>
> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <[email protected]>
Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
> index 3c9c7492252f..aa9d3cf69580 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c
> @@ -1054,7 +1054,7 @@ void irq_force_complete_move(struct irq_desc *desc)
> * of the interrupt on the apic/system bus would be delayed
> * beyond the point where the target cpu disables interrupts
> * in stop machine. I doubt that it can happen, but at least
> - * there is a theroretical chance. Virtualization might be
> + * there is a theoretical chance. Virtualization might be
> * able to expose this, but AFAICT the IOAPIC emulation is not
> * as stupid as the real hardware.
> *
> --
> 2.30.0
>
--
~Randy