In line 824, it is trying to open `out_ep`, so
I believe in line 826, it should print `out_ep`
instead of `in_ep`
Signed-off-by: AristoChen <[email protected]>
---
drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_printer.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_printer.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_printer.c
index 2f1eb2e81d30..a3b17ec00bf0 100644
--- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_printer.c
+++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_printer.c
@@ -823,7 +823,7 @@ set_printer_interface(struct printer_dev *dev)
result = usb_ep_enable(dev->out_ep);
if (result != 0) {
- DBG(dev, "enable %s --> %d\n", dev->in_ep->name, result);
+ DBG(dev, "enable %s --> %d\n", dev->out_ep->name, result);
goto done;
}
--
2.25.1
On Sun, Feb 14, 2021 at 05:40:25PM +0800, AristoChen wrote:
> In line 824, it is trying to open `out_ep`, so
> I believe in line 826, it should print `out_ep`
> instead of `in_ep`
>
> Signed-off-by: AristoChen <[email protected]>
> ---
> drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_printer.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_printer.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_printer.c
> index 2f1eb2e81d30..a3b17ec00bf0 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_printer.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_printer.c
> @@ -823,7 +823,7 @@ set_printer_interface(struct printer_dev *dev)
>
> result = usb_ep_enable(dev->out_ep);
> if (result != 0) {
> - DBG(dev, "enable %s --> %d\n", dev->in_ep->name, result);
> + DBG(dev, "enable %s --> %d\n", dev->out_ep->name, result);
> goto done;
> }
>
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Hi,
This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman. You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response. He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created. Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.
You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:
- You did not write a descriptive Subject: for the patch, allowing Greg,
and everyone else, to know what this patch is all about. Please read
the section entitled "The canonical patch format" in the kernel file,
Documentation/SubmittingPatches for what a proper Subject: line should
look like.
- It looks like you did not use your "real" name for the patch on either
the Signed-off-by: line, or the From: line (both of which have to
match). Please read the kernel file, Documentation/SubmittingPatches
for how to do this correctly.
If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.
thanks,
greg k-h's patch email bot