2021-03-05 09:51:13

by Gustavo A. R. Silva

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: [PATCH RESEND][next] nfp: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
through to the next case.

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
index b3cabc274121..3b8e675087de 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
@@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ nfp_repr_get_stats64(struct net_device *netdev, struct rtnl_link_stats64 *stats)
case NFP_PORT_PF_PORT:
case NFP_PORT_VF_PORT:
nfp_repr_vnic_get_stats64(repr->port, stats);
+ break;
default:
break;
}
--
2.27.0


2021-03-05 12:22:15

by Simon Horman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND][next] nfp: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:49:37AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
> by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
> through to the next case.
>
> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>

Thanks Gustavo,

this looks good to me.

Acked-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>

> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
> index b3cabc274121..3b8e675087de 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ nfp_repr_get_stats64(struct net_device *netdev, struct rtnl_link_stats64 *stats)
> case NFP_PORT_PF_PORT:
> case NFP_PORT_VF_PORT:
> nfp_repr_vnic_get_stats64(repr->port, stats);
> + break;
> default:
> break;
> }
> --
> 2.27.0
>

2021-04-20 20:48:48

by Gustavo A. R. Silva

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND][next] nfp: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

Hi all,

Friendly ping: who can take this, please?

Thanks
--
Gustavo

On 3/5/21 06:19, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:49:37AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
>> by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
>> through to the next case.
>>
>> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
>
> Thanks Gustavo,
>
> this looks good to me.
>
> Acked-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
>
>> ---
>> drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c | 1 +
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
>> index b3cabc274121..3b8e675087de 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
>> @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ nfp_repr_get_stats64(struct net_device *netdev, struct rtnl_link_stats64 *stats)
>> case NFP_PORT_PF_PORT:
>> case NFP_PORT_VF_PORT:
>> nfp_repr_vnic_get_stats64(repr->port, stats);
>> + break;
>> default:
>> break;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.27.0
>>

2021-04-21 10:12:56

by Simon Horman

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [oss-drivers] Re: [PATCH RESEND][next] nfp: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 03:23:39PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> On 3/5/21 06:19, Simon Horman wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:49:37AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> >> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
> >> by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
> >> through to the next case.
> >>
> >> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
> >> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
> >
> > Thanks Gustavo,
> >
> > this looks good to me.
> >
> > Acked-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
>
> Hi all,
>
> Friendly ping: who can take this, please?

Hi Jakub, Hi David,

I'm happy to repost this patch if it would help with your processes.

> >> ---
> >> drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c | 1 +
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
> >> index b3cabc274121..3b8e675087de 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
> >> @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ nfp_repr_get_stats64(struct net_device *netdev, struct rtnl_link_stats64 *stats)
> >> case NFP_PORT_PF_PORT:
> >> case NFP_PORT_VF_PORT:
> >> nfp_repr_vnic_get_stats64(repr->port, stats);
> >> + break;
> >> default:
> >> break;
> >> }
> >> --
> >> 2.27.0
> >>

2021-05-19 09:20:50

by Gustavo A. R. Silva

[permalink] [raw]
Subject: Re: [oss-drivers] Re: [PATCH RESEND][next] nfp: Fix fall-through warnings for Clang

Hi all,

I'm taking this in my -next[1] branch for v5.14.

Thanks
--
Gustavo

[1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/gustavoars/linux.git/log/?h=for-next/kspp

On 4/21/21 04:39, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 03:23:39PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>> On 3/5/21 06:19, Simon Horman wrote:
>>> On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 03:49:37AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
>>>> In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a warning
>>>> by explicitly adding a break statement instead of letting the code fall
>>>> through to the next case.
>>>>
>>>> Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115
>>>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <[email protected]>
>>>
>>> Thanks Gustavo,
>>>
>>> this looks good to me.
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Simon Horman <[email protected]>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Friendly ping: who can take this, please?
>
> Hi Jakub, Hi David,
>
> I'm happy to repost this patch if it would help with your processes.
>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c | 1 +
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
>>>> index b3cabc274121..3b8e675087de 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_repr.c
>>>> @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@ nfp_repr_get_stats64(struct net_device *netdev, struct rtnl_link_stats64 *stats)
>>>> case NFP_PORT_PF_PORT:
>>>> case NFP_PORT_VF_PORT:
>>>> nfp_repr_vnic_get_stats64(repr->port, stats);
>>>> + break;
>>>> default:
>>>> break;
>>>> }
>>>> --
>>>> 2.27.0
>>>>